Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-25-2013, 04:34 PM
 
13,511 posts, read 19,281,755 times
Reputation: 16580

Advertisements

I thought this was interesting...Yahoo! News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2013, 05:08 PM
 
217 posts, read 360,872 times
Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by purehuman View Post
I thought this was interesting...Yahoo! News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
Thorium cycle will up the radiation dose to workers in the plant, but to public shouldn't change much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2013, 06:18 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick gar View Post
Thorium cycle will up the radiation dose to workers in the plant, but to public shouldn't change much.
How would that happen?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,898 times
Reputation: 6839
My biggest fear concerning Nuclear power is that the tin foil hat wearer's and emotional thinkers in this country will overwelm the logical thinkers and kill our only real chance to get off of fossil fuels, by building new modern plants here in America.



bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 07:01 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Nuclear is much too expensive. We'll be better off with a combination of wind and solar supplemented with natural gas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 07:10 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Nuclear is much too expensive. We'll be better off with a combination of wind and solar ..........
That's news to the energy world, new breakthrough?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
That's news to the energy world, new breakthrough?
No same old problem that nuclear has had all over the western world. You can't build one for anything close to the projected cost. See the experience with Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant. Meanwhile the cost of wind and solar are committed to in advance and that price is dropping rapidly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,898 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
No same old problem that nuclear has had all over the western world. You can't build one for anything close to the projected cost. See the experience with Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant. Meanwhile the cost of wind and solar are committed to in advance and that price is dropping rapidly.
Nuclear power plants could be built for a reasonable price if you keep out the unions. Chose one modern design and build 20,30,50 of them, look at the way France has done it.
Look don't get me wrong I love wind and solar but there's no way they can supply us with the demand we need now or in the future, I wish it could but it cannot.


bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 04:03 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
No same old problem that nuclear has had all over the western world. You can't build one for anything close to the projected cost. See the experience with Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant. Meanwhile the cost of wind and solar are committed to in advance and that price is dropping rapidly.
If one were to look at FACTS:

Regional Variation in Levelized Costs of New Generation Resources, 2017

EIA - Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Early Release

One would see as usual you are wrong......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2013, 07:14 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
Nuclear power plants could be built for a reasonable price if you keep out the unions. Chose one modern design and build 20,30,50 of them, look at the way France has done it.
Look don't get me wrong I love wind and solar but there's no way they can supply us with the demand we need now or in the future, I wish it could but it cannot.


bill
If wishes were horses. There have been some nuclear plants built with open shop labor. One that I remember couldn't even be started up the construction was so shoddy. See Zimmer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top