Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2018, 05:29 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,986,619 times
Reputation: 3572

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
Show us your work.


The energy in gasoline and coal is contained in the C-C and the C-H bonds. It's released as those bonds are oxidized (co2 & h2o waste products). doesn't make a heckuvalot of difference what the actual configuration of the fuel molecule is to start with.

As I said in my first post here, the actual kinetic energy of the vehicles are essentially the same.


What's the energy efficiency of a coal fired plant (65% lost as heat) + the efficiency of the transmission process (5% lost as heat) + efficiency of the charging process (10%+ lost as heat)? It seems that at least 80% of the coal's chemical energy never makes it to the drive wheels.


I would calculate that an ICE and an EV powered by fossil fuel sourced juice have about the same co2 output. Now add in the inefficiency of battery power in cold weather and the EV is behind in the race.
Guido, the fact that I'm a degreed engineer, with a professional license who works in the field is enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2018, 05:32 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,318 posts, read 60,489,441 times
Reputation: 60906
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Not true. It shows the wind resource is greater at night. That isn't true everywhere, but in the Plains states where our major wind resource exists, it's true most of the time.
No it doesn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2018, 10:54 AM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,234 posts, read 5,110,683 times
Reputation: 17722
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Guido, the fact that I'm a degreed engineer, with a professional license who works in the field is enough.


My mother and The Pope are the only people I believe without question (and I'm kidding about one of them).


Show me figures/documentation that refute the ones I posted. Here's mine:


https://www.worldcoal.org/reducing-c...-emission-coal (67% lost as heat)


https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=105&t=3 (5% lost as heat)


Efficient EV Charging : EVWORLD.COM (10-12% lost as heat)


total - 82-84% lost as heat for EV powered from coal plant (not counting cold weather inefficiencies)


https://www.greencarreports.com/news...-of-38-percent (average of ICE = 80% lost as heat)


While we're at it: average energy consumption of EV is 30kW/100 miles. Average cost of grid power in US is @22cents/kW (call it 20c) so it costs ~ $6 to travel 100 miles in an EV, An ICE vehicle getting the average 25 mpg and gas $2.50/gal goes the 100 miles for a cost of ~$10-- an extra $4 for the peace of mind & convenience that you'll get there and won't have to wait 6 hrs to refuel before you start for home.


The EV will be a niche usage vehicle for the foreseeable future. You engineers have been working on an improved battery since Henry Ford's first attempt at a horseless carriage and haven't really made much progress. (BTW- they dug up a thing that looks remarkably like a Leyden jar in the ruins of ancient Babylon- 5000 yrs old.... They finally gave up on the Philosopher's Stone too a while back.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 05:20 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,986,619 times
Reputation: 3572
Average residential price of electricity for residential consumers in 2017 was 12.89¢/kWh. Average price of gasoline Oct 2018 $2.78. Using your other numbers EV cost for 100 miles $3.87. ICE $11.12. ICE is 4 times as expensive. If you drive 10,000 miles a year that's a savings of $834
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,013 posts, read 14,186,291 times
Reputation: 16727
Electric cars are not the answer.
Barring a technological breakthrough, the most efficient form of land transport is steel wheel on steel rail - preferably electric powered. In fact, rail is 20 times more efficient than rubber tire on pavement. In plain English, you can move 20 times as much cargo or passengers via rail for the same fuel as used by a car, truck or bus.
Thus for an optimized consolidation of population in villages, towns, and cities, it is paramount that rail transportation be available, in all forms and modes. Rebuilding the urban streetcar network, the interurban lines, and adding track to accommodate fast and light passenger trains would make city life more attractive and less expensive.
But the 'hegemony' won't allow it.
(Automobile mfg, petroleum, pavement, and others)

If Americans shifted to a transport system that would slash fuel costs by 90% (and effectively wipe out all those who got wealthy by subterfuge and guile), you can understand their reluctance.

SKEPTICAL?
....
http://la.curbed.com/archives/2012/0..._monorails.php
LA's Worst Transit Decision

In 1963, Alweg proposed to the city of Los Angeles a monorail system that would be designed, built, operated and maintained by Alweg. Alweg promised to take all financial risk from the construction, and the system would be repaid through fares collected. The City Council rejected the proposal in favor of no transit at all. (thanks to Standard Oil)

“A former Alweg engineer once told me that there was much excitement for the proposal at the time, that is until Standard Oil got involved. Practically overnight support for the project disappeared amongst LA politicians.”
....
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out Americans were punked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 06:29 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,986,619 times
Reputation: 3572
Mass transit where feasible is absolutely the way to go. A 21st century city must have an efficient mass transit system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 12:06 PM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,234 posts, read 5,110,683 times
Reputation: 17722
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Average residential price of electricity for residential consumers in 2017 was 12.89¢/kWh....
That's average retail price. Add in the taxes which average 11cents/kW-hr.


In my estimate, I lowered the price of both electricity and gasoline ~10% for easy arithmetic....Look up "Fermi problem." It may help you gain perspective in analyzing situations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 12:21 PM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,234 posts, read 5,110,683 times
Reputation: 17722
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
...the most efficient form of land transport is steel wheel on steel...
Thus for an optimized consolidation of population in villages, towns, and cities, ....

The key word is "optimized," as opposed to maximized or minimized.


RR/trolley is great to get people or goods from point A to point B. The problem is you still gotta get to point A and away from point B.


Our RR system moves freight very well but you still need trucks to get most of it to and from the terminals.


Same with commuting by trolley-- it's great if you start and end reasonably close to the rail line, but how far do you want to walk to get to it?


Your point about lobbying is well taken. I come from Chicago. It was so cold there one day, I saw my alderman with his hands in his own pockets for a change...(.Laid out in regular grid pattern, Chicago lends itself well to public transportation and was used by all up until the 60s or so when the Unions took over-- They forced wages up so high that it was no longer cheaper to ride than to drive yourself.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,013 posts, read 14,186,291 times
Reputation: 16727
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
The key word is "optimized," as opposed to maximized or minimized.
NOPE.
EFFICIENT - Acting or producing effectively with a minimum of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort.

The laws of Physics recommend steel wheel on steel rail based on rolling resistance.
Science of Railway Locomotion

Leave it to government, especially socialist / unionized government to ruin things for rail transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2018, 05:21 AM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,234 posts, read 5,110,683 times
Reputation: 17722
-timely & authoritative article comparing various configurations of EVs: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/...ce-every-year/


"This post’s message (the abstract, if this were a normal clisci peer reviewed paper) is simple. Hybrid vehicles make economic and ‘climate’ sense. Plug ins may or may not depending on their architecture. Full electric vehicles (EVs) make neither economic nor climate sense."


Several of the comments from readers following the article point out that cost per mile comparing ICEs with EVs will disappear as EVs become more commonplace and road use taxes replace gasoline taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top