|

08-13-2009, 05:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Minnysoda
1,863 posts, read 959,248 times
Reputation: 582
|
|
U.S. wind power installation slows.
U.S. wind power installation slows | Reuters
They can blame the economy all they want.. It doesn't pay, bottom line. Note how
"The wind industry hopes the U.S. Senate will pass strong mandates for utilities to generate a certain amount of their power from renewable sources like wind and solar power in the climate bill."
When you have to hold a gun to people heads to buy a product something is wrong with said product...
That said, the more they put up the more money/job security I get so bring it on!!!!
|
|

08-13-2009, 07:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"In Exile"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
5,050 posts, read 1,716,804 times
Reputation: 1757
|
|
I'll be in NW Iowa on a work project this weekend. There is this area called "Buffalo Ridge" that runs through SW Minnesota & NW Iowa. It's one of the most consistently windy areas in the country, so they have built thousands of wind generators through that corridor.
One of the main problems I see with wind generators is that you'll always need a second source of electricity - and that alone makes it cost prohibitive.
Another issue is the technology. I do think that one of the reasons the government subsidizes these things is in hopes that the technology will improve and, in the near future, they will be efficient enough - and we'll have the infrastructure - to make them cost effective. Time will tell, I guess.
Personally, I would love to see wind generation technology come to the point where virtually ever consumer and household could buy a generator and produce most of their own electricity.

|
|

08-15-2009, 12:43 PM
|
|
If you refuse to use your brain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Heartland
6,756 posts, read 4,428,507 times
Reputation: 7937
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks
I'll be in NW Iowa on a work project this weekend. There is this area called "Buffalo Ridge" that runs through SW Minnesota & NW Iowa. It's one of the most consistently windy areas in the country, so they have built thousands of wind generators through that corridor.
One of the main problems I see with wind generators is that you'll always need a second source of electricity - and that alone makes it cost prohibitive.
Another issue is the technology. I do think that one of the reasons the government subsidizes these things is in hopes that the technology will improve and, in the near future, they will be efficient enough - and we'll have the infrastructure - to make them cost effective. Time will tell, I guess.
Personally, I would love to see wind generation technology come to the point where virtually ever consumer and household could buy a generator and produce most of their own electricity.
|
City codes will prohibit this. Ours already do. A generator here is required to have, I believe, an acre of property and be far enough from the lot line that it will fall within it if it topples.
No mention of smaller units that go on the roof.
|
|

08-15-2009, 02:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Are we there yet? I gotta go."
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Way South, ME
1,599 posts, read 649,711 times
Reputation: 926
|
|
|
I think we need fresher wind technologies that utilize units with a more compact profile. With all our resources I can't understand why Americans would stop at the standard propeller turbine on a pole when other wind technologies could be exploited. the best way to go would be units that could be residence dedicated instead of feeding a grid at large.
|
|

08-16-2009, 05:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austin, TX
2,265 posts, read 952,717 times
Reputation: 502
|
|
I like the idea of residence dedicated power, so much power is wasted in transmission losses. Unfortunatly, winds can be so fickle in most places. A residential application probably isn't very cost effective unless you live in a very windy area.
Small wind generators are already available for sailboats, which have modest power needs and there is almost always some wind when out at anchor. These could readily be adapted for modest residential needs as well.
SOUTHWEST WINDPOWER
Air Breeze Wind Generators $879
http://images.westmarine.com/large/9446014.jpg

|
|

08-17-2009, 11:35 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"In Exile"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
5,050 posts, read 1,716,804 times
Reputation: 1757
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptnRn
I like the idea of residence dedicated power, so much power is wasted in transmission losses. Unfortunatly, winds can be so fickle in most places. A residential application probably isn't very cost effective unless you live in a very windy area.
Small wind generators are already available for sailboats, which have modest power needs and there is almost always some wind when out at anchor. These could readily be adapted for modest residential needs as well.
SOUTHWEST WINDPOWER
Air Breeze Wind Generators $879
|
Right.
Wind generated power cannot be your only source of electricity - and that is one of the major drawbacks.
I would be very tempted to spend $15,000 to erect a wind generator in my back yard if it would completely eliminate my $110 per month electricity bill. But it wouldn't. It'd probably only knock $25-$30 per month off my bill, making the return on investment too small.
Also, it should be noted that those huge wind generators are LOUD. You don't notice it so much in the day, but at night it's very noticeable. And while we could all get used to it - like we get used to city noise anyway - there are a lot of people who simply would not want to put up with it.
|
|

08-17-2009, 02:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austin, TX
2,265 posts, read 952,717 times
Reputation: 502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcrackly
I think we need fresher wind technologies that utilize units with a more compact profile. With all our resources I can't understand why Americans would stop at the standard propeller turbine on a pole when other wind technologies could be exploited. the best way to go would be units that could be residence dedicated instead of feeding a grid at large.
|
Could you explain more what you mean by "fresher wind technologies".
|
|

08-18-2009, 06:19 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Are we there yet? I gotta go."
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Way South, ME
1,599 posts, read 649,711 times
Reputation: 926
|
|
|
I am not an engineer nor have I yet invested in any such wind technology (beyond my electric bill grid preferences) but I am intrigued by the variant wind generator possibilities. I think with the reality of our physically congested, code ordinance restricted world it is necessary to think outside the box and investigate harnessing the wind in ways other than the tower propeller turbine.
Here are just a few examples of different applications:
Microwind Generator: 30X More Efficient and Cheaper!
Inhabitat » HELIX WIND TURBINE: Small Wind Gets Smart
WePOWER
Aerotecture International - ProductsInhabitat
» MICRO WIND TURBINES: Small Size, Big Impact
|
|

08-18-2009, 10:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
12,374 posts, read 5,804,718 times
Reputation: 3897
|
|
|
This energy source is so full of disinformation it might as well be Cold Fusion. The hype has overwhelmed the engineering. In some places wind power makes sense but not everywhere. Please remember wind and solar both collect energy not reliable power and must be backed up by a conventional thermal or gas turbine plant or have the power fluctuations leveled by, in the case of utility level systems, pumped hydro storage units.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|