Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That link doesn't take me to anything pertaining to this topic.
I can assure you, the brown smog over Asia, particularly China, was not caused by cows. The smogs that famously plagued LA and other dense urban areas, were not caused by livestock. It was caused by automobiles. In Asia, coal burning (in dirty, inefficient plants) is a major problem. It may shock you but the air quality in rural, agricultural areas is quite cleaner (and clearer), in general, than cities full of automobiles. Vermont isn't full of cow smog.
We're going in circles here...you insist on focusing on greenhouse gases, I'm looking at bigger, more immediate threats: carcinogens and other toxins in the air, oil and other chemicals getting into the water, landfills full of hazardous materials...as yet we don't fully understand climate change and how much we impact it or not, and some science suggests we're headed for a cold period anyways (just consider in fact the past changes...it always warmed up then suddenly dropped into a cold period). If we stop emitting any greenhouse gases entirely, it still won't stop climate change. In the immediate future, all the pollution I mentioned above will cause untold suffering and disease among people, animals, etc., and we have the ability to reverse that (if countries like China step up to the plate anyways...).
You also skip over how much damage switching to vegetarianism will do. Currently, much of our livestock (beef particularly) is raise on poor land for crops. We will need to either: A) clear more of our good wildlife habitat to raise crops here or B) import more, which just shifts where the habitat destruction happens, and adds transportation issues to the mix. This also ignores the rest of the world, where many countries would have to import nearly all their food because their land is only good for livestock.
And if I bring up hunting, you will say hunting is cruel.
We're going in circles here...you insist on focusing on greenhouse gases, I'm looking at bigger, more immediate threats: carcinogens and other toxins in the air,.....
Agree, part of the global warming propaganda machine is to lump greenhouse gases into the same category as truly toxic agents. I'd imagine a lot of the propaganda being distributed about meat originates from sources like PETA. It should be noted the 6 most common air pollutants in the US have drooped by more than 50% since 1980.
Not included in that is lead which has dropped by something like 98% which I would imagine primarily was due to it being removed from gasoline.
The fundamental issue with any of these regulations is that unless it's addressed globally you're really not accomplishing much. If you take mercury emissions for example the EPA estimates sources within the US account for about 3% of the global total and about 1% of that is from coal fired plants. The EPA estimates about 1/3 of those emissions get deposited within the US and the rest enter the global pool. Asia on the other hand accounts for about 50% of the global emissions primarily from China and India.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
