Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2010, 02:52 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 2,576,256 times
Reputation: 661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sadiemagnolia View Post
It's narrowed down from just past Stone (going toward Pleasantburg) all the way to White Oak (just before you get to the Pleasantburg intersection). Only 2 lanes w/ a turn lane in the middle.
PLUS, bike lanes!

I think it's fantastic, and more forward-thinking than some posters realize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2010, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,680 posts, read 11,539,296 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvillesc View Post
PLUS, bike lanes!

I think it's fantastic, and more forward-thinking than some posters realize.
I agree it's a forward-thinking "feel-good" kind of thing, but I would think E. North St. should be a main conduit of traffic into town from the Eastside. As the area grows, it (and other roads) will still need to be able to handle more traffic per day
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 03:27 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 2,576,256 times
Reputation: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateBooster View Post
I agree it's a forward-thinking "feel-good" kind of thing, but I would think E. North St. should be a main conduit of traffic into town from the Eastside. As the area grows, it (and other roads) will still need to be able to handle more traffic per day
If Greenville does absolutely NOTHING about mass transportation, then yes, we will need roads to be wider and our only option will be automobiles. However, narrower roads, increased pedestrian-friendly corridors, sidewalks, and bike lanes all work into the promotion and viability of a MUCH greater transportation future outside of cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,680 posts, read 11,539,296 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvillesc View Post
If Greenville does absolutely NOTHING about mass transportation, then yes, we will need roads to be wider and our only option will be automobiles. However, narrower roads, increased pedestrian-friendly corridors, sidewalks, and bike lanes all work into the promotion and viability of a MUCH greater transportation future outside of cars.
I WANT to believe you..... I think people should have access to and use a comprehensive public transport system, but..... This is the independent-minded U.S. of A. after all.... (and I say that as a fairly darned conservative person).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 04:20 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 2,576,256 times
Reputation: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateBooster View Post
I WANT to believe you..... I think people should have access to and use a comprehensive public transport system, but..... This is the independent-minded U.S. of A. after all.... (and I say that as a fairly darned conservative person).
The independent-minded US of A... that's got to come to grips with a depleting world oil supply, and a way of life that deeply depends on oil. That dependency involves the resources needed, the production process, the packaging, and delivery of goods. Currently, there's NOTHING even close to being capable of replacing oil in our lives. Somethings gonna give eventually. It's planning ahead and changing our development patterns that will prepare us...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,680 posts, read 11,539,296 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvillesc View Post
The independent-minded US of A... that's got to come to grips with a depleting world oil supply, and a way of life that deeply depends on oil. That dependency involves the resources needed, the production process, the packaging, and delivery of goods. Currently, there's NOTHING even close to being capable of replacing oil in our lives. Somethings gonna give eventually. It's planning ahead and changing our development patterns that will prepare us...
Oh, I agree with you. But, of course, I thought SUV's would be a thing of the past by now (given the spike in gas prices a couple yrs ago).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 05:50 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 2,576,256 times
Reputation: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateBooster View Post
Oh, I agree with you. But, of course, I thought SUV's would be a thing of the past by now (given the spike in gas prices a couple yrs ago).
The trouble is that gas prices didn't stay at that level. Most of us have gone back to very much the same routine as before, I'm sure. Oil isn't going to be found again in such abundance and in such a cheap and easy harvesting manner as exists now. So, no, SUV's haven't gone away, BUT neither has cheap gasoline. It came back, and the demand for less fuel-efficient vehicles returned, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,680 posts, read 11,539,296 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvillesc View Post
The trouble is that gas prices didn't stay at that level. Most of us have gone back to very much the same routine as before, I'm sure. Oil isn't going to be found again in such abundance and in such a cheap and easy harvesting manner as exists now. So, no, SUV's haven't gone away, BUT neither has cheap gasoline. It came back, and the demand for less fuel-efficient vehicles returned, too.
Maybe, but I'm saying that I learned a lesson that year, and the size of the vehicle I drive (and found could get along just fine with, thank you very much) is MUCH reduced from now on. Just doesn't seem to have caught on with very many others, though. Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 09:24 PM
 
1,941 posts, read 4,467,794 times
Reputation: 971
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvillesc View Post
If Greenville does absolutely NOTHING about mass transportation, then yes, we will need roads to be wider and our only option will be automobiles. However, narrower roads, increased pedestrian-friendly corridors, sidewalks, and bike lanes all work into the promotion and viability of a MUCH greater transportation future outside of cars.
I agree. And I love my SUV.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top