Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2021, 07:03 AM
 
1,912 posts, read 1,128,571 times
Reputation: 3192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by USNRET04 View Post
I'm not against trains, its just the enormity of the matter and of course the costs.
Is there a level of costs that would be acceptable to bring more passenger rail to the upstate?

For example, if the cost per year to the government was as low as $500,000 or $1 million, would that be acceptable?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2021, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Upstate
9,501 posts, read 9,812,678 times
Reputation: 8885
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
Is there a level of costs that would be acceptable to bring more passenger rail to the upstate?

For example, if the cost per year to the government was as low as $500,000 or $1 million, would that be acceptable?
Per mile? That wouldn't be enough money to even purchase land.

It's going to be an astronomical investment. I would love to have a train, but it would cost billions just for the ATL to CLT line. Where would that money come from? What other areas that need tax payer dollars, would we have to rob that from. There is only so much money, even in a Trillion dollar plus bill.

What is the purpose of the train really? Is it really for high speed travel? Or is it bragging rights, or the romantic lure of it? How much would you pay to go to Atlanta or Charlotte. What is reasonable?

There is a startup trying to build passenger electric VTOL aircraft (urban air taxi). It could zip you to CLT in 45 min or ATL in about an hour. Since its private, very little tax dollars would be needed. Or we could use some tax dollars to help develop this type of transportation.

https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news...ir-taxi-debut/ (This is a prototype 2 seat version. Larger versions could be made).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Greer
2,213 posts, read 2,843,672 times
Reputation: 1737
I don't know much about potential passenger rail projects, but I do know there is already a long distance train that passes through Atlanta and Greenville and Spartanburg and Charlotte twice daily. I would think they could use the same rails and not need to buy any more land.



I briefly worked in Charlotte while living in Greenville, for a few months after being laid off from my Greenville job in 2009. It was a miserable commute and I'd have been glad to take a train. If it was convenient enough I'd have done that indefinitely, live in Greenville and work in CLT. But that's if and only if getting to the train station in Greenville and getting from the train station in Charlotte to my employer would not be to long or difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 12:51 PM
 
396 posts, read 417,411 times
Reputation: 986
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
Is there a level of costs that would be acceptable to bring more passenger rail to the upstate?

For example, if the cost per year to the government was as low as $500,000 or $1 million, would that be acceptable?
To assist in building the line or stations? Or an annual subsidy to cover cost overruns? If the latter, heck no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 12:52 PM
 
1,912 posts, read 1,128,571 times
Reputation: 3192
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
I don't know much about potential passenger rail projects, but I do know there is already a long distance train that passes through Atlanta and Greenville and Spartanburg and Charlotte twice daily. I would think they could use the same rails and not need to buy any more land.

You're 100% right.

Current proposals for additional train service in the Upstate, and the types of trains that NC and VA have added in the past few years, are conventional trains using existing cars and locomotives and existing, conventional track.

If one of the numerous Charlotte-Raleigh trains were extended to Atlanta, the costs of running the train over existing track, to existing stations, and with existing cars and locomotives, would be mostly just operating costs.

When Virginia added a similar train (from Washington to Lynchburg), it budgeted $2.9 million per year in state subsidy and spent significantly less, since the costs of just running a train aren't that high.

When people say "we can't have a train, it would cost billions", that's like telling a teenager or a spouse that he or she can't have a car because a Rolls-Royce is too expensive.

Nobody is proposing a high-speed, expensive system for the Upstate, other than the inane Georgia DOT proposal which will never happen (and the money that the GA DOT is spending for a study, for a high-speed train system that has almost no chance of ever being built, is a complete waste of money).

The specific proposals for actual trains are the ones above: conventional trains using existing equipment on existing track. That's what Amtrak is currently proposing.

It would be nice to have improved track for fast trains, but the political will isn't there to spend the money for that.

Last edited by GSPNative; 06-14-2021 at 01:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 02:34 PM
 
1,912 posts, read 1,128,571 times
Reputation: 3192
I checked further, and North Carolina spends $1.5 million per year for each of the pairs of Charlotte-to-Raleigh trains.


So I think it's reasonable to expect the SC portion of an Atlanta-to-Charlotte (and to Raleigh) pair of trains to be about $1.5 million per year.


I think that's affordable, but that's just my subjective view.


The Gateway (I-85/I-385 interchange upgrade) cost about $240 million. I have zero problem with that, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 02:56 PM
 
396 posts, read 417,411 times
Reputation: 986
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post


The Gateway (I-85/I-385 interchange upgrade) cost about $240 million. I have zero problem with that, either.
It also provides access to many more people, as well as commercial traffic. The value transported over that interchange vs. a single passenger rail route is considerably higher and more beneficial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 03:17 PM
 
1,912 posts, read 1,128,571 times
Reputation: 3192
Quote:
Originally Posted by _burrito View Post
It also provides access to many more people, as well as commercial traffic. The value transported over that interchange vs. a single passenger rail route is considerably higher and more beneficial.

As I said, I have zero problem with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2021, 06:34 PM
 
Location: The place where the road & the sky collide
23,814 posts, read 34,678,989 times
Reputation: 10256
Quote:
Originally Posted by USNRET04 View Post
Per mile? That wouldn't be enough money to even purchase land.

It's going to be an astronomical investment. I would love to have a train, but it would cost billions just for the ATL to CLT line. Where would that money come from? What other areas that need tax payer dollars, would we have to rob that from. There is only so much money, even in a Trillion dollar plus bill.

What is the purpose of the train really? Is it really for high speed travel? Or is it bragging rights, or the romantic lure of it? How much would you pay to go to Atlanta or Charlotte. What is reasonable?

There is a startup trying to build passenger electric VTOL aircraft (urban air taxi). It could zip you to CLT in 45 min or ATL in about an hour. Since its private, very little tax dollars would be needed. Or we could use some tax dollars to help develop this type of transportation.

https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news...ir-taxi-debut/ (This is a prototype 2 seat version. Larger versions could be made).
NCDOT worked with Virginia to get the line from DC to Raleigh upgraded for high speed diesel. There is one stretch left between Richmond and Raleigh. Hopefully Biden's infrastructure bill will plug that hole. The new train station has been built in Raleigh. The new station for Charlotte needs to be built.

The Lynx line in Charlotte was extended. Next is a line running from Matthew's to Belmont. Gaston County wants to extend the light rail line from Belmont to Gastonia, possibly as far out as Kings Mountain.

Right now the problem isn't Greenville or Spartanburg. It's Cherokee County. You'll never convince the state government to invest rail money there. NCDOT has been working with Georgia on extending the high speed diesel from Charlotte to Atlanta. The last I heard they were trying to decide if they would keep the existing route, through Gastonia, which takes the train through Cherokee County or divert through York County. Also, Norfolk Southern isn't big on sharing their line with passenger trains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2021, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Upstate
9,501 posts, read 9,812,678 times
Reputation: 8885
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
I checked further, and North Carolina spends $1.5 million per year for each of the pairs of Charlotte-to-Raleigh trains.


So I think it's reasonable to expect the SC portion of an Atlanta-to-Charlotte (and to Raleigh) pair of trains to be about $1.5 million per year.
My comments earlier was hung up on high speed trains. I just assumed we wanted to get to destinations quicker and more efficiently than we could now.

For instance, Charlotte-to-Raleigh train trip is a reasonable $33 one way and the travel time is a little over 3 hours. Of course this doesn't include travel to and from the station, waiting at the station or paying for parking if needed. So lets say 4 hours train time (parking/waiting) and possibly 30 min each way to final destinations. So 5 hours. (Just an average guess).

To drive Charlotte-to-Raleigh, it's about 2H 40min. Roughly $18 in fuel. You could argue 3 hours if spending time in traffic. Still a 2 hour savings and $30 in your pocket. And of course this is all on a SINGLE PASSENGER. If you have a second person in the car, the costs per person go down exponentially or up if you are on the train.

The Amtrak proposal, if they could keep prices the same as above would work for folks who don't have personal transportation, or just don't feel like driving. Those who don't want to take a bus or plane. I can see business persons who could work on the train as they travel instead of driving.

My point is, will their be enough residents willing to spend more than double the cost and time to take a Amtrak? Would it be a ROI and not have to rely a whole lot on tax dollars?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top