U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2011, 12:05 PM
 
571 posts, read 1,010,824 times
Reputation: 484

Advertisements

Gun Collector

You may have heard on the news about a southern California man put under 72-hour psychiatric observation when it was found he owned 100 guns and allegedly had (by rough estimate) 100,000 rounds of ammunition stored in his home. The house also featured a secret escape tunnel.





My favorite quote from the dimwit television reporter: "Wow! He has about a quarter million machine gun bullets." The headline referred to it as a "massive weapons cache".

By southern California standards someone owning 100,000 rounds would be called "mentally unstable". Just imagine if he lived elsewhere:

In Arizona, he'd be called "an avid gun collector".

In Texas, he'd be called "a novice gun collector".

In Utah, he'd be called "moderately well prepared", but they'd probably reserve judgment until they made sure that he had a corresponding quantity of stored food.

In Montana, he'd be called "The neighborhood 'Go-To' guy".

In Idaho, he'd be called "a likely gubernatorial candidate".

In Wyoming, he'd be called "an eligible bachelor".

And, in Louisiana, hed be called "a deer hunting buddy".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2011, 03:10 PM
 
69 posts, read 78,500 times
Reputation: 45
The reporter must be a product of a California public school education. 100,000 isn't a quarter million where I come from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2011, 05:40 PM
 
2,305 posts, read 3,663,620 times
Reputation: 3431
Kalifornia must have something in its water. Folks build houses on dirt cliffs and then complain that the home is threatened by a landslide when it rains-DUH!. Then they build houses in the pretty forests and then complain and whine when the forest catches fire-DUH! Now they want folks to hunt with bullets that contain no lead. They pretty much have said the Constitution of the United States is meaningless by restricting what firearms you can have. It'll be a blessed day when the Pacific Ocean claims that to be a good place to raise fish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,046 posts, read 23,029,354 times
Reputation: 11132
You should probably find the entire article that mentioned him exposing himself to people in Wal-Mart. That email has been running around for a bit, but it certainly doesn't tell the whole story. He wasn't put under observation for guns, he was put under observation for having a loose zipper in public. He just happened to also have guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 11:30 AM
 
4,134 posts, read 2,823,863 times
Reputation: 1588
Moonbeam just illegalized open carry.

Most people don't realize that until just recently, California was an open carry state but that's gone. There are still two CA counties that will issue a CCW to a regular citizen (Both are near Reno and on the CA/NV border). While CC is still technically legal in CA, unless you're a politician or can afford to bribe your local sheriff, you're SOL.

Basically CA gun laws are based on what some nitwit saw in a movie and thought was scary. As we all know the stock of a gun completely alters ballistics and performance characteristics because we've seen it evidenced time and again in Canadian Sci-fi movies.

In this state, if you have 100 guns you're nuts but if you have 100 cats, you're an upstanding citizen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Cody, WY
5,072 posts, read 4,142,100 times
Reputation: 8000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkHunter View Post
You should probably find the entire article that mentioned him exposing himself to people in Wal-Mart. That email has been running around for a bit, but it certainly doesn't tell the whole story. He wasn't put under observation for guns, he was put under observation for having a loose zipper in public. He just happened to also have guns.
And the government murdered the people at the Waco church to prevent child molesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 01:31 PM
 
1,337 posts, read 429,005 times
Reputation: 656
"You may have heard on the news about a southern California man put under 72-hour psychiatric observation when it was found he owned 100 guns and allegedly had (by rough estimate) 100,000 rounds of ammunition stored in his home. The house also featured a secret escape tunnel. ..."

And he likely loses it all (including the right possess) if they formally commit him even for 1 week week for further evaluation (or 1 day, for that matter).

Conservatively, that's like $200,000 worth of goods. Wish I had his bankroll. I can't even afford to shoot my .300 Win Mag.

Last edited by FreedomThroughAnarchism; 11-28-2011 at 01:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 11:41 PM
Status: "Mr. Frou-Frou man." (set 17 days ago)
 
20,734 posts, read 13,519,410 times
Reputation: 17786
Guess the ding dong missed this lesson in boot.


This Is My Rifle. This Is My Gun - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 01:14 PM
 
765 posts, read 852,301 times
Reputation: 678
I consider myself mentally unstable for NOT having a 100 guns and 100,000 rds of ammo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 01:27 PM
 
Location: San Diego
17,420 posts, read 14,060,907 times
Reputation: 6185
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Kalifornia must have something in its water. Folks build houses on dirt cliffs and then complain that the home is threatened by a landslide when it rains-DUH!. Then they build houses in the pretty forests and then complain and whine when the forest catches fire-DUH! Now they want folks to hunt with bullets that contain no lead. They pretty much have said the Constitution of the United States is meaningless by restricting what firearms you can have. It'll be a blessed day when the Pacific Ocean claims that to be a good place to raise fish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top