Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-24-2014, 04:50 PM
 
Location: NWA/SWMO
3,106 posts, read 3,986,147 times
Reputation: 3279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasRedneck View Post
At the range, I'm 100% ear protection. Out hunting, not so much, mainly because it masks other sounds that may be being made (another party in our group in distress, etc).

Three run......the results are in, and yeah - as suspected your constipation is being caused by your head being in the exit.
My ear-pro magnifies sounds. You need to buy something nice for yourself this Christmas. Hearing is irreplaceable, and think of all the sounds you're NOT hearing because you aren't wearing electronic ear-pro (I can hear leaves MUCH! better with mine, and I just have a cheap set of Peltor Tac6s because sometimes I train in the rain/it is prone to getting hit on car roofs/doors,etc. and I don't want to break nice things).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2014, 04:52 PM
 
Location: NWA/SWMO
3,106 posts, read 3,986,147 times
Reputation: 3279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threerun View Post
Well then....

7mm Rem. Mag. (175 at 2870) 9lb (rifle weight) 21.7 (recoil energy) 12.5 (recoil velocity)

.30-06 Spfd. (180 at 2700) 8.0———————— 20.3--------------------12.8
.45-70 (350 at 1900) 7.0————————-37.9---------------------18.7
338 Win. Mag. (225 at 2780) 8.5-----------------35.2 --------------------16.3

I have a .30-06 and a 45-70 guide gun. I owned a .338 WinMag Sako and will more than likely get another. Out of curiosity- How much did your 'shoulder beast' tamer set you back?
Most of the perception of recoil reduction is due to the 16-30oz (depending on suppressor) weight handing ON THE END of the barrel. Think about it...gas is not being redirected out some other oriface like a brake. Mass and velocity of the projectile are un-changed.

So you want to figure his recoil reduction? Add 1.5# or whatever to the rifle-weight in your equation, and consider its effect on muzzle-rise and the shooter's perception that recoil = muzzle rise, and I think you will find your answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2014, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Chattanooga, TN
3,045 posts, read 5,238,589 times
Reputation: 5156
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWG223 View Post
Most of the perception of recoil reduction is due to the 16-30oz (depending on suppressor) weight handing ON THE END of the barrel. Think about it...gas is not being redirected out some other oriface like a brake. Mass and velocity of the projectile are un-changed.

So you want to figure his recoil reduction? Add 1.5# or whatever to the rifle-weight in your equation, and consider its effect on muzzle-rise and the shooter's perception that recoil = muzzle rise, and I think you will find your answer.
Not exactly... the mass x velocity of the bullet is unchanged, as is the mass of the propellant gasses, but the velocity of the propellant gasses is significantly reduced with a suppressor. The can captures some of the gas giving it room to expand in an enclosed area, and it leaves the end of the barrel much slower. With some calibers the propellant gasses can generate over half of the total recoil.

As for the 7mm R-Mag vs. .30-06... No, it's not a "shoulder beast" when compared against something like a lightweight .45-70 carbine. But it's still above the "flinch threshold" of about 20ft-lbs, which is one of several the reasons why the US Military dropped from the .30-06 to the .308 after Korea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,743 posts, read 22,631,331 times
Reputation: 24902
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWG223 View Post
Most of the perception of recoil reduction is due to the 16-30oz (depending on suppressor) weight handing ON THE END of the barrel. Think about it...gas is not being redirected out some other oriface like a brake. Mass and velocity of the projectile are un-changed.

So you want to figure his recoil reduction? Add 1.5# or whatever to the rifle-weight in your equation, and consider its effect on muzzle-rise and the shooter's perception that recoil = muzzle rise, and I think you will find your answer.
They weigh 1.5lbs?! Oh God no way I want to schlep that kind of additional weight in the mountains.

I just looked up the shotgun recoil tables. My 3" goose loads in a Mossberg 500 push about 54lbs recoil energy. I hardly notice it in the moment, and we shoot a crap load of rounds on an average hunt morning. I'm still curious as to the cost of these things.

Last edited by Threerun; 12-25-2014 at 03:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:54 PM
 
Location: West Phoenix
966 posts, read 1,343,935 times
Reputation: 2547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threerun View Post
They weigh 1.5lbs?! Oh God no way I want to schlep that kind of additional weight in the mountains.

I just looked up the shotgun recoil tables. My 3" goose loads in a Mossberg 500 push about 54lbs recoil energy. I hardly notice it in the moment, and we shoot a crap load of rounds on an average hunt morning. I'm still curious as to the cost of these things.

Couple of hundred or more for a silencer, then you have to be fingerprinted, pay a $200 tax, and wait anywhere between 6 months and a year for the ATF to process your paperwork before you can pick up your silencer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,743 posts, read 22,631,331 times
Reputation: 24902
Couple hundred bucks ain't bad. Might be neat to have at the range or when shooting prairie dogs from the kitchen window.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Chattanooga, TN
3,045 posts, read 5,238,589 times
Reputation: 5156
Quote:
Originally Posted by West Phx Native View Post
Couple of hundred or more for a silencer, then you have to be fingerprinted, pay a $200 tax, and wait anywhere between 6 months and a year for the ATF to process your paperwork before you can pick up your silencer.
Couple of hundred for a cheap .22LR model. A thousand or more for a high-quality silencer rated for high-power rounds. You can even get one for your Mossberg... it attaches with an adapter that fits your choke threads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2014, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,038,378 times
Reputation: 2147483647
Wyoming is legal and has been for a while, but cost has been prohibitive, so far. It is on my to see if u can take a little bark out of my .25-06.

I do I use electronic muffs that take out a very large part of the bark. I used to shoot 2 DCM matches a day, and that would be 130 rounds of .30-06. Pretty taxing on the ears, so I started using the electronic muffs. The do an outstanding job of dampening, and they amplify for range commands. A neat sideline to it is you can crank it up while hunting and amplify game movement. But I still want to surpress as soon as I can afford to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2014, 09:30 PM
 
Location: New Braunfels, TX
7,130 posts, read 11,826,047 times
Reputation: 8043
Whole lotta "experts" on here......with inaccurate info and guesses.

The suppressor weighs 20.7 ounces. I walk a half mile to the blind, so it's not anything really hard to put up with.

My last two stamps took 4 months to come back on a Form 4 Trust.

The Saker cost me $900 + the tax stamp.

The Silencerco Osprey I won, so only had to pay for the tax stamp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2014, 11:28 PM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,038,378 times
Reputation: 2147483647
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasRedneck View Post
Whole lotta "experts" on here......with inaccurate info and guesses.

The suppressor weighs 20.7 ounces. I walk a half mile to the blind, so it's not anything really hard to put up with.

My last two stamps took 4 months to come back on a Form 4 Trust.

The Saker cost me $900 + the tax stamp.

The Silencerco Osprey I won, so only had to pay for the tax stamp.
There is a company, the name escapes me right now, out of Cheyenne Wyoming that makes and sells suppressors. I understand they make a pretty good one. I have NOT had the opportunity to test fire one of their suppressors. Would like to shoot with and without suppressor. Price is compatible. They quoted me $875. They have 3 or 4 units and I don't even remember which model I got the price quote for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top