Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2013, 05:26 AM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,163,275 times
Reputation: 10693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
Well, mine came in the mail today. Monthly premium is now $59.23.

Inpatient hospital care went from $200 to $275 for the first five days.

Outpatient surgery went from $165 to $250----I called and asked if that was correct and yes, it is. I asked if that meant that if you go to a dermatologist and they burn a mole off your skin it's $250 and they said yes. I said that going to a dermatologist and getting checked for skin cancer (especially here by the ocean) is always recommended and a good prevention. They said, yes it is.

Seems counter productive to make people pay this much to have a skin problem taken care of. Will cost the insurance co. a lot more if this person develops cancer.

I'm going to look into a Blue Cross plan for the state of Mass.
I just had outpatient surgery....$95,000 worth...$250 really is NOT bad. Most traditional plans you would pay a heck of a lot more than that in deductibles and co-insurance...and your premiums are a LOT more than $54/month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2013, 06:16 AM
 
748 posts, read 1,372,633 times
Reputation: 954
Most insurance companies will not cover having your moles checked, even if you are not on medicare. Its not part of preventive care, no matter what age. I dont agree with this but thats how it is right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,158 posts, read 26,104,568 times
Reputation: 27898
I know the drug costs don't, at this point, mean anything to Escort Rider, but if my husband had that policy, just the increase in 1 Tier 4 drug would mean an extra $420 a year.
$250 increase on other drugs
$40 increase for his average hospital stay if only once.
Conservatively figuring an increase of $710 a year.....not insubstantial and not counting lab work at $10 more each time which would be, at minimum, 4 times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Idaho
6,344 posts, read 7,711,964 times
Reputation: 14136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
While I have no direct personal experience, I have read that you cannot enroll in a plan unless you live in the designated area which the plan serves...
I have Kaiser at my place of employment here in SoCal and have been very satisfied with them. In planning for my retirement years, I recently asked my local Kaiser front office lady where Kaiser facilities are located in the Pacific Northwest. I know that there are some Kaiser facilities in the Portland/Vancouver area and wanted to know if there was one in Spokane/Coeur d'Alene.

She couldn't really answer and said that Northern California and the Pacific Northwest were a "different" Kaiser than they are. I'm not sure what that means, but she seemed to indicate that they were different systems and that I cannot just transfer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 02:58 PM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,163,275 times
Reputation: 10693
Quote:
Originally Posted by volosong View Post
I have Kaiser at my place of employment here in SoCal and have been very satisfied with them. In planning for my retirement years, I recently asked my local Kaiser front office lady where Kaiser facilities are located in the Pacific Northwest. I know that there are some Kaiser facilities in the Portland/Vancouver area and wanted to know if there was one in Spokane/Coeur d'Alene.

She couldn't really answer and said that Northern California and the Pacific Northwest were a "different" Kaiser than they are. I'm not sure what that means, but she seemed to indicate that they were different systems and that I cannot just transfer.
They share the same name but they are separate entities much in the same way the Blue Cross/Blue Shield in each state is it's own entity but they are still BC/BS. They have their own networks, own leadership, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach FL
14,617 posts, read 21,424,579 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
Original Medicare will only pay for mole removal if a biopsy is done and it's cancerous - that's what Robyn posted quite a while back - irrc. So, Medicare doesn't pay for preventive mole removal at all.

I'm on Advantage and my doc (in his office) used liquid nitrogen to remove a whole bunch (just like my deceased aunt, I'm getting the darn things everywhere). I've got a whole bunch of new ones that need to be removed, now. UHC paid him $165, I paid $40. That was it. There is nothing in my plan changes for 2014 about outpatient surgery, at all. Don't know how I never had to pay for this, but I didn't.

Well, for zero premium, I figure I'll have to pay for some things. That, or go on a Medigap at a cost of $2500/yr, minimum, or a HD-Plan F for $700/yr, with a $2,050 deductible. Somehow, paying $200/mo. for a Medigap plus $105 for Part B doesn't appeal. Nor does $700/yr, and still be exposed to $2,050 oops.

There's no free lunch when it comes to health care.
Nope - I didn't say anything about moles (I have a few small ones - but I've never had one removed). I did have skin cancer surgery (Mohs) pre-Medicare - and my insurance covered that. I've had non-cancerous sebaceous cysts removed post-Medicare (by a plastic surgeon) - and Medicare covered those procedures (based on the size/locations of the cysts - they were painful and somewhat debilitating). Guess the issue for any type of insurance is whether you're doing something for cosmetic reasons (not covered) - or non-cosmetic reasons (covered).

FWIW - although this technically doesn't deal with Advantage plans - it's a good idea to take a look at Part D plans for 2014. One of the drugs I take (Premarin) is being kicked up from a Tier 3 to Tier 4 drug under the UHC Part D plan. Robyn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,607 posts, read 56,339,423 times
Reputation: 23297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
Original Medicare will only pay for mole removal if a biopsy is done and it's cancerous - that's what Robyn posted quite a while back - irrc. So, Medicare doesn't pay for preventive mole removal at all.
Nope - I didn't say anything about moles (I have a few small ones - but I've never had one removed). I did have skin cancer surgery (Mohs) pre-Medicare - and my insurance covered that. I've had non-cancerous sebaceous cysts removed post-Medicare (by a plastic surgeon) - and Medicare covered those procedures (based on the size/locations of the cysts - they were painful and somewhat debilitating). Guess the issue for any type of insurance is whether you're doing something for cosmetic reasons (not covered) - or non-cosmetic reasons (covered).
This was the post I recollected:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55 View Post
Note that with something like removal of moles - it could be coded/viewed as a cosmetic (not medical) procedure (unless there was something like a biopsy that might indicate a cancer or pre-cancerous condition). If considered cosmetic - it wouldn't be covered by any type of Medicare - or any other type of medical insurance for that matter. Robyn
But, I didn't irrc, exactly, clearly. Medical vs. cosmetic. Got it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55 View Post
FWIW - although this technically doesn't deal with Advantage plans - it's a good idea to take a look at Part D plans for 2014. One of the drugs I take (Premarin) is being kicked up from a Tier 3 to Tier 4 drug under the UHC Part D plan. Robyn
So, what does this mean for your cost? There was a time I took Premarin - but not for the past 9 years. Premarin cream is listed as Tier 3 in my 2014 formulary, but the pill isn't listed at all. Tier 3 is listed as $45, Tier 4 is listed as $95 per prescription - I assume 3-mo. supply. A bit pricey. Can't remember what I paid back in the day.

Last edited by Ariadne22; 09-27-2013 at 03:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach FL
14,617 posts, read 21,424,579 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
...So, what does this mean for your cost? There was a time I took Premarin - but not for the past 9 years. Premarin cream is listed as Tier 3 in my 2014 formulary, but the pill isn't listed at all.
I don't know what it means. Like I mentioned in another thread - I'm in "pay mode" on a supplemental policy until the end of 2014. That policy covers me 100% in terms of "out of pocket" costs. Also - I recall there are changes coming up in terms of the drug "doughnut hole" - but I can't remember what they are (can anyone off the top of his/her head ?). Think this is the kind of thing I'll put on on my pop-up calendar to review with 60-90 days notice at the end of 2014. If I tried to solve all this stuff in advance - I think I'd go totally nuts . Robyn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,017 posts, read 20,861,203 times
Reputation: 32530
Default Removal of skin growths

I think it is outrageous that an insurer would consider "burning off" a mole (presume that means freezing it) as out-patient surgery. It takes just a few seconds! At Kaiser that is all part of the office visit ($5). To me out-patient surgery means something like a hernia operation or cataract (eye) surgery in which there is some complex procedure involved. The common denominator for out-patient surgery seems to be simply that they do not keep you overnight, but that it is still "real" surgery.

I would be up in arms about calling burning off a mole "out-patient surgery". What an abuse (of the English language, for one thing)!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach FL
14,617 posts, read 21,424,579 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
I think it is outrageous that an insurer would consider "burning off" a mole (presume that means freezing it) as out-patient surgery. It takes just a few seconds! At Kaiser that is all part of the office visit ($5). To me out-patient surgery means something like a hernia operation or cataract (eye) surgery in which there is some complex procedure involved. The common denominator for out-patient surgery seems to be simply that they do not keep you overnight, but that it is still "real" surgery.

I would be up in arms about calling burning off a mole "out-patient surgery". What an abuse (of the English language, for one thing)!
I think you're reading too much into the terminology. "Out-patient" is simply the opposite of "in-patient" (the latter involves a hospital stay). And surgical care/procedures are simply the opposite of medical care/procedures. Anything that involves cutting/freezing/etc. would be surgical (as opposed to medical). Something doesn't have to be big (or even medium) deal to be considered "surgical". Robyn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top