Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22
The single is an employee with an employer subsidy. Self Plus One is priced on one employee (subsidized) and one nonsubsidized nonemployee. Nothing odd about that. Private employers do this all the time - will subsidize the employee, will not subsidize employee's SO/family.
|
Interesting. I wonder if the OP is referring to a private sector employment plan, or a federal employer plan. My husband and I were notified of the new availability of a "self plus one" category for the federal employees BCBS insurance that we use as secondary to Medicare, and have switched to that for 2016. The premium for the Standard Option in this plan will be $501 a month, as opposed to the family plan premium which will be $515. This was an increase in the family plan premium of $450 or so in 2015. I did wonder at the small difference between the premiums for the self plus one vs. the family plan, but figured my husband's explanation about subsidizing costs for those family plans was probably right. I had not realized that an employer subsidy might not include all of the insured individuals ( ie, nonemployees) on a given plan.
But I am not about to sign any petition, looking at what's happened with other folks and their health insurance, coverage and lack of same, and their costs, I realize how lucky we are. Being on Medicare, if we didn't have this secondary insurance we would either need to purchase a medigap plan for each of us, as well as a Part D plan each to cover prescription meds. Depending on those plans, to get coverage close to equivalent to that of our secondary BCBS, we'd spend significantly more than those new premiums will cost us.