Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2017, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,884,808 times
Reputation: 11259

Advertisements

I am 58 with a heart condition. The wife is 57 with diabetes. My BCBS plan costs me $340 a month. Great insurance at a cheap price. It was a bit better before Obamacare, adding them 25 year olds costs money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2017, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,851 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34057
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Tornado chaser and crocodile dentist amongst others.
dang, you're right I forgot about those!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 12:33 PM
 
59 posts, read 58,352 times
Reputation: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
I am 58 with a heart condition. The wife is 57 with diabetes. My BCBS plan costs me $340 a month. Great insurance at a cheap price. It was a bit better before Obamacare, adding them 25 year olds costs money.
Compared to plans in my state, this is way lower cost. Are you receiving subsidies (aka tax credits) via the ACA?

I found little difference between metal levels in premiums in my state. Insurance provider was BCBS as well. Here are the numbers by age for a Silver plan (all silver plans were similar):

The system I used allowed me to type in different ages for my ACA plan and got this per person cost by age/yr: 30:$4300, 40:$4800, 50:$6900, 55:$8712, 60:$10492, 64:$11202. Per person, no subsidies (tax credits).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 07:42 AM
 
9,857 posts, read 7,724,981 times
Reputation: 24527
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
I am 58 with a heart condition. The wife is 57 with diabetes. My BCBS plan costs me $340 a month. Great insurance at a cheap price. It was a bit better before Obamacare, adding them 25 year olds costs money.
That is very affordable. We're the same age and healthy and premiums in our area are 4 times that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 06:59 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,726 posts, read 26,798,919 times
Reputation: 24788
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
Conservatives are always telling us that the problem with health care is "that there isn't enough competition" and that if we would only let the free market "do its job" than everyone would have affordable medical care.
want.
True. There is no free market when it comes to health insurance.

https://psmag.com/the-promise-and-pe...m-38c0dbbba13b

Free-market health care? GOP plan doesn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2017, 11:37 PM
 
6,329 posts, read 3,615,450 times
Reputation: 4318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Based on some of the comments, it would appear that the main argument against universal health care is that some people don't want others who, in their opinion, are undeserving to get something for free.

The problem, of course, is that the rest of us who may be 'deserving' are paying a small fortune for healthcare that should be a lot cheaper (if other developed countries are anything to go by) because we refuse to change the system so that we can continue to stick it to the 'undeserving'.
This is how I increasingly feel as well. Unless you are lucky enough to work for the government you likely pay a very large monthly premium for insurance that isn't even as good as what you can get for a government health insurance plan. This is what we found out when we compared my employers plan that we used to be on with my wife's state plan after she was newly hired.

If the poor are already not paying there share with or without Obama Care what do we have to risk by going single payer? It can't get any worst for the working middle class and the poor already get their freebies anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2017, 07:54 AM
 
174 posts, read 407,328 times
Reputation: 162
Default I want those numbers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
I am 58 with a heart condition. The wife is 57 with diabetes. My BCBS plan costs me $340 a month. Great insurance at a cheap price. It was a bit better before Obamacare, adding them 25 year olds costs money.
You're kidding, really?? I would love to know the terms of that insurance; I know the numbers for our immediate circle of friends (in the "Triangle" NC) and no one with those types of stats is paying less than $1500 per month...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2017, 08:00 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,726 posts, read 26,798,919 times
Reputation: 24788
"I had a health crisis in France. I’m here to tell you that ‘socialized medicine’ is terrific:"

I had a health crisis in France. I’m here to tell you that ‘socialized medicine’ is terrific - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 07:50 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,726 posts, read 26,798,919 times
Reputation: 24788
"The important aspect of the Iowa case is what it tells us about the importance of spreading risk in the healthcare market, and the limitations of the Republican nostrum of segregating seriously ill patients into high-risk pools. The idea is to keep their costs from driving up everyone else’s premiums.

The case also points directly to the benefits of a single-payer healthcare system."


This one unbelievably expensive Iowa patient makes the case for single-payer healthcare - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2017, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,832,669 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
"The important aspect of the Iowa case is what it tells us about the importance of spreading risk in the healthcare market, and the limitations of the Republican nostrum of segregating seriously ill patients into high-risk pools. The idea is to keep their costs from driving up everyone else’s premiums.

The case also points directly to the benefits of a single-payer healthcare system."


This one unbelievably expensive Iowa patient makes the case for single-payer healthcare - LA Times

That was a very informative article. This one which is linked to on the same page is also very informative.

Republicans base their new Obamacare repeal on a Maine program they call a success. Don't believe them - LA Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top