Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:31 AM
 
Location: Not.here
2,828 posts, read 4,317,622 times
Reputation: 2377

Advertisements

There are a few promising non-invasive tests on the horizon..... a blood test

Quote:
Potsdam, Germany, Oct 26, 2010 (Thomson Reuters ONE via COMTEX) -- Signature Diagnostics / Signature Diagnostics to Present Company's Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategy at the 18th UEGW Congress in Barcelona Processed and transmitted by Thomson Reuters. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Signature Diagnostics to Present Company's Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategy at the 18th UEGW Congress in Barcelona - MarketWatch
and a home-based stool DNA test..

Quote:
* Exact Sciences test detects 87 percent of tumors
* Finds 64 percent of pre-cancerous growths (Adds details on 2nd test, refiles to fix headline)


UPDATE1-New colon cancer test works without colonoscopy | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2010, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,855 posts, read 65,574,293 times
Reputation: 19374
Those percentages are not high enough for me! 100% would be good. Getting a colonoscopy does not hurt and does not damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,206 posts, read 14,761,111 times
Reputation: 10213
Southern belle, colonoscopy carries a risk!
Colonoscopy Risks - Overview of Colonoscopy Risks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,855 posts, read 65,574,293 times
Reputation: 19374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollytree View Post
Southern belle, colonoscopy carries a risk!
Colonoscopy Risks - Overview of Colonoscopy Risks
The numbers of injuries reported in that article are far less than the probability of missing cancer reported in the OP. And as your article states, use a specialist and do a good prep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 04:37 PM
 
Location: anywhere
1,731 posts, read 4,665,741 times
Reputation: 1889
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernBelleInUtah View Post
Those percentages are not high enough for me! 100% would be good. Getting a colonoscopy does not hurt and does not damage.

The colonoscopy doesn't hurt, I slept through mine. But the prep the day before could only have been invented by Satan!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,206 posts, read 14,761,111 times
Reputation: 10213
quote: Getting a colonoscopy does not ... does not damage

I was simply responding to your incorrect assertion. Major medical tests are hardly risk free. As you say, it's a risk/reward situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Not.here
2,828 posts, read 4,317,622 times
Reputation: 2377
There's also another fairly recent procedure out there that's available now. It's called Virtual Colonoscopy and it is performed by taking images of the large intestine using computerized tomography (CT) or, less often, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). You still have to prep the day before and there's the minor discomfort to put up with when they insert a tube to enlarge the large intestine with gas or a liquid. But the picture taking part only takes about 10 minutes. I think these are available at major hospitals and medical institutions like universities at this time. This NIH link gives a good summary.

Virtual Colonoscopy

It also has a unique advantage over the regular optical colonoscopy because it's capable of finding malignant cancers outside the colon in places like the kidneys, lungs, etc. Here's a very good article about all this.

"A new, large-scale study of more than 10,000 adults found that more than one in every 200 asymptomatic people screened with CT colonography, or virtual colonoscopy, had clinically unsuspected malignant cancer and more than half of the cancers were located outside the colon. The findings were published in the April issue of the journal Radiology."

Virtual colonoscopy allows detection of unsuspected cancers beyond colon

Anyone here had a V.C.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Not.here
2,828 posts, read 4,317,622 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernBelleInUtah View Post
Those percentages are not high enough for me! 100% would be good. Getting a colonoscopy does not hurt and does not damage.
I think it will be a very good thing for all those, about 50% of the population, that refuses to go in for the invasive regular optical colonoscopy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 12:16 AM
 
5,644 posts, read 13,172,098 times
Reputation: 14170
The problem with all of these "non invasive" and "virtual" colonoscopies is that they will never really replace colonoscopy...

None of these other tests allow the physician to not only "take a look" but also to "remove" any polyps that are identified both for diagnosis and treatment...

If the polyps is benign or malignant...its GONE

If you have a "virtual" colonoscopy and possible polyps are noted, you still have to go through a regular colonoscopy to have the polyps removed...

Having had a colonoscopy I can attest that the only uncomfortable part of the procedure is the prep....and you still have to go through the prep for a virtual scope...to me there is NO advantage to the virtual route.

I would also love to see stats showing "50%" of folks are skipping out on recommended colonoscopies....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2010, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Not.here
2,828 posts, read 4,317,622 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz View Post
The problem with all of these "non invasive" and "virtual" colonoscopies is that they will never really replace colonoscopy...

None of these other tests allow the physician to not only "take a look" but also to "remove" any polyps that are identified both for diagnosis and treatment...

If the polyps is benign or malignant...its GONE

If you have a "virtual" colonoscopy and possible polyps are noted, you still have to go through a regular colonoscopy to have the polyps removed...

Having had a colonoscopy I can attest that the only uncomfortable part of the procedure is the prep....and you still have to go through the prep for a virtual scope...to me there is NO advantage to the virtual route.
I agree with what you said. There is no doubt that the colonospic procedure which examines and can remove any polyps found in a single exam is a wonderful thing. I don't think these new procedures are meant to replace that. They are simply another tool in the arsenal against colon cancer. If they pan out, they will be a huge benefit to all those who, for whatever their reasons, are reluctant to go in for the full procedure that you had. If something is detected in a blood or stool test, at least they know that they need treatment whereas in the past they may not have had much of a clue until things got worse.

Quote:
I would also love to see stats showing "50%" of folks are skipping out on recommended colonoscopies....
The medical profession keeps mentioning how high the number of non-screened people are. Here's one study that looked at it and these were just the people that had been advised by their doctors to have it done but avoided it. The highlights are my own.

"RESULTS
Half of all patients referred for colonoscopy failed to complete the procedure, overwhelmingly because of nonscheduling. In multivariable analysis, female sex, younger age, and insurance type predicted poorer adherence. Patient-reported barriers to screening completion included cognitive-emotional factors (e.g., lack of perceived risk for CRC, fear of pain, and concerns about modesty and the bowel preparation), logistic obstacles (e.g., cost, other health problems, and competing demands), and health system barriers (e.g., scheduling challenges, long waiting times). Women reported more concerns about modesty and other aspects of the procedure than men. Only 40% of patients were aware of alternative screening options.


Predictors of Nonadherence to Screening Colonoscopy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top