Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 03-30-2012, 09:18 AM
 
2,401 posts, read 4,682,792 times
Reputation: 2193

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
Latest study of 110,000 adults, over a 20-year period, comes to this conclusion. Story found here.

Key points made in the article:
- A 3-ounce serving of unprocessed red meat was associated with a 13% greater chance of dying during the course of the study.
- Adding one hot dog or 2 slices of bacon ("processed" meats) was linked to a 20% higher risk of death during the study.
- Eating a serving of nuts instead of beef or pork was associated with a 19% lower risk of dying during the study.
- Substituting poultry or whole grains was linked with a 14% reduction in mortality risk; low-fat dairy or legumes, 10%; fish, 7%.
- Among the 37,698 men and 83,644 women who were tracked, as meat consumption increased, so did mortality risk.

I've been working towards a more vegetarian diet for a while, and have found a book by Mark Bittman titled How to Cook Everything Vegetarian. It's a thick heavy book of about a thousand pages and I learned of it by searching for info in these very forums.

I feel better if I eat no meat at a meal; if I do, I feel very sluggish and have to walk slower, or else I'm in discomfort.

They say so about eggs (and many things as well) too...
then... years later, "more studies" says its not so.

Then studies also says, certain medication is "good" for you....
Then years later, you can file a lawsuit b/c these studies failed to warn you of its potential "side effects", or even complications "after"....

If you buy into the hype of "studies"...
Then think & think again of predecessors of that "failed studies" when more studies comes out...
hence even a "doctor" called it a "practice"... NOT an exact science unlike physics.

Another great example of the "great"...
Who could have forgotten Steve Jobs & his organic, vegan diet...
We missed him and that "diet" still does him no good!!!
Cancer... happens to my older aunt as well where in Asia, being vegan is so easy a diet... still that diet does not contribute to that "healthier" life everyone & her seek.

Then... I know people who never manage their diets (mostly from my in-law side)... and ate tons of "red meat" from cow farms... they lived till 90 plus. Genetics??? Likely, but includes "red meat" diet too.

So...
Don't ever judge a book via "cover" or some studies...
When everything done in "moderation" that "golden way" is probably the most well balanced & even "happi" way.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2012, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
16,391 posts, read 30,922,186 times
Reputation: 16643
I'm going to keep working out and keep eating red meat. I'll let you vegetarian liberals stay skinney and keep preachin while I stop worrying.

People are living to their 100s these days and I think it is safe to say they aren't all vegetarians.

Live a healthy lifestyle and red meat should be the least of your worries... people have been doing it for hundreds of years. Look at the cultures that are vegetarians... you're really telling me those Indian people are better off?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,941,000 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padgett2 View Post
My family are red meat eaters. We usually manage to have good health well into our 80s and 90s.

I wonder how old we could live if we didn't eat red meat.......and would we really want to live longer?
I also have "proof" that smoking is good for your health. My dad smoked a pack of Camels a day until he was 55, and pipe and cigars after that, and died in his sleep at home at 94. My mother breathed his second hand smoke, and died in her sleep at home at 98. Anecdotal evidence like my family and yours does not trump scientifically conducted broad-based studies.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Buxton, England
6,990 posts, read 11,411,515 times
Reputation: 3672
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I also have "proof" that smoking is good for your health. My dad smoked a pack of Camels a day until he was 55, and pipe and cigars after that, and died in his sleep at home at 94. My mother breathed his second hand smoke, and died in her sleep at home at 98. Anecdotal evidence like my family and yours does not trump scientifically conducted broad-based studies.
So what, to any correlations found in some "scientific study" there are always going to be a percentage of people who are exceptions to it, such as myself. So at least on an individual level yeah I do trump this "evidence". I couldn't give a crap if eating meat's going to take a few months of anybody else's life or give them a heart attack or cholesterol problems or whatever. I'll enjoy my lifestyle without boring sad health-preachers breathing down my neck.

As for the OP's quote " if I do (eat meat), I feel very sluggish and have to walk slower, or else I'm in discomfort" I LOL'd. I'd sure be walking slower if I ate a boring diet of vege-crap salads washed down with glasses of water cause I'd have no bleedin' energy!

His title "All red meat is bad for you" is just provocative also as it is a blank point "imperative" statement which is to say, wrong. It is no more right that saying "All water is bad for you" or "all oxygen is bad for you", because too much of either of those can be, as can too much of anything.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,941,000 times
Reputation: 36644
Insufficient data. We have a link to a rewrite by a hack newspaper staffer gleaned from a research press release, but where is the data?

Very important: Who was the control group? Or, was this just 110,000 people who volunteered and wrote down what they ate? If that was the case, the deaths cold have been caused by other lifestyle characteristics that are also shared by the kinds of people who eat a lot of red meat.

OK, 13% greater chance of dying. Lets say in the entire survey, one percent of the participants died. (To simplify the arithmetic -- The actual death rate in the USA is 0.83%.) Then 1.13% of the participants who ate red meat died. 1,240 instead of 1,100. Or, red meat contributed to the death of 140 people out of 110,000. Over 20 years, which is 7 a year, in a city the size of Manchester, New Hampshire. Not very scary.

Last edited by jtur88; 03-30-2012 at 11:45 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 12:23 PM
 
7,099 posts, read 27,178,043 times
Reputation: 7452
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I also have "proof" that smoking is good for your health. My dad smoked a pack of Camels a day until he was 55, and pipe and cigars after that, and died in his sleep at home at 94. My mother breathed his second hand smoke, and died in her sleep at home at 98. Anecdotal evidence like my family and yours does not trump scientifically conducted broad-based studies.
You are correct. This is not "proof." However, since we don't know how long people who don't eat meat (or smoke) would have lived if they had, we have no way of knowing that they lived longer. It's flawed research because it's not controlled. It could be that they would have lived even longer if they had added red meat and smoked.

Studies such as this one, are based on guess work as to what would happen....maybe.....if....perhaps. You have no way of comparing what really DID happen to that which MIGHT have happened.

Now, if you could take 100,000 babies at birth and feed one group one way, and the other, another way. Keep records of how they did, when they died, etc. then you would have a meaningful research project.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic east coast
7,115 posts, read 12,657,474 times
Reputation: 16098
Yep, I guess our Western way of eating is a paragon of good health and that's why we as a nation top the list for cancers, diabetes, obesity and heart disease. It's working well--especially for the pharmaceutical industry.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Buxton, England
6,990 posts, read 11,411,515 times
Reputation: 3672
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleDolphin View Post
Yep, I guess our Western way of eating is a paragon of good health and that's why we as a nation top the list for cancers, diabetes, obesity and heart disease. It's working well--especially for the pharmaceutical industry.

The problem with the "western way of eating" is not in meat consumption but refined sugars and inflammatory chemicals used in food processing.

Those diseases such as cancer, diabetes and obesity are mostly associated with high sugar consumption. Refined carbohydrates are an entirely processed, man made bastardization of carbohydrates, which are highly dangerous to the body, because of how quick the sugar level rises in the blood. They also now make up the majority of the modern western diet. High blood sugar levels, obviously lead to insulin resistance, and also inflammation to the linings of blood vessels including arteries. This inflammation is damage to the artery walls which the body attempts to protect by building plaques of cholesterol (which is usually floating harmlessly around in the blood) on the artery walls. However this in turns sparks heart disease, high blood pressure etc... All of these problems come from excess blood sugar and excess refined carbohydrates, not meat or saturated fat. The cholesterol in the blood is mostly from the liver and not fats from meats.

Diets including plenty of red meat and vegetables, on the other hand, are not associated with such conditions, and people have been known to even reverse diabetes on low carb diets high in so called "unhealthy" red meat, and vegetables. Heart disease is not caused by eating red meat either. Diabetes and obesity have absolutely nothing to do with red meat consumption, and obesity is just as prevalent in vegetarians as meat eaters.

This whole demonising meat culture is perpetuated by know-nothings who probably ram plenty of fruit juices (high in fructose and very dangerous, certainly leading to diabetes) down their throat lecturing about how healthy their diet is. The low-fat craze starting in the 70's was miraculously associated with massive rises in diabetes and heart disease as people cut down on fat (including meats) and replaced it with crap full of sugar instead, thinking it was healthier.

There's so much misinformation out there. I'll go on eating my red meat thanks, while ignorants of this society continue to stuff chocolate and sugary bull down their throats believing it's good for them cos one article said "a small square of dark chocolate is good for you" and they interpreted it as "eat as much chocolate as you like! You'll live forever". Duuuh.

Last edited by Weatherfan2; 03-30-2012 at 01:53 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Jollyville, TX
5,865 posts, read 11,920,390 times
Reputation: 10902
You know if eating meat makes you feel bad, by all means, find yourself another source of protein. Eating starchy carbs makes me feel bad and I can't tolerate grains. That doesn't mean I think everyone should give them up. Some people's bodies react differently to different types of foods. You need to figure out what makes YOU healthy but don't assume it applies to everyone.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2012, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic east coast
7,115 posts, read 12,657,474 times
Reputation: 16098
Meat equals saturated fat equals clogged arteries equals heart disease....personally, I've never heard a cardiologist recommend a patient eat more meat to reverse their heart disease the way Dr. Dean Ornish or Dr. John McDougall have reversed heart disease by changing a heart patient's diet...but my mind's open..if anyone can cite any studies or cardiologists' recommendations to consume more meat for better heart and artery health, I'd sure be willing to listen and learn.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top