U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:20 AM
 
82 posts, read 247,342 times
Reputation: 87

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimoso48 View Post
Thank you for the responses, i'm still not sure, because i've heard of many women rejecting men because they were uncirmcised but never because they were.
So american women reject Latin and European men because they are uncircumcised. All those british actors who conquer hollywood at the moment would get rejected because they are uncircumcied. What I see is than most american women litterally throw themselves at these men, I dont know any European or Latin guy who experienced this and me neither. Its an urban myth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:30 AM
 
82 posts, read 247,342 times
Reputation: 87
Its amazing that the ancient greeks, a society thousands years ago valued foreskin. According to Hodges, ancient Greek aesthetics of the human form considered circumcision a mutilation of a previously perfectly shaped organ. Greek artwork of the period portrayed penises as covered by the foreskin.

The roman empire considered circumcision as barbaric and disgusting. Those guys also had flaws in many things, but with this one they were right.

USA ist most detached of the cradle of western civilization, its not a good sign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 02:04 PM
 
Location: East Central Pennsylvania/ Chicago for 6yrs.
2,539 posts, read 2,309,582 times
Reputation: 1483
Quote:
Originally Posted by VillaD_Rock View Post
Read this.

The Touch Test: Can You Feel the Difference? - The WHOLE Network: Accurate Circumcision & Foreskin Information

The foreskin has more nerve endings than the head of the penis , 20000 compared to 4000. As a male I can say I would rather lose the nerves in my g-lans (why does this word get censored lol) than in my foreskin. Would you cut off the g-lans of a baby.

Gently run your fingers over the back of your hand. Now, turn your hand over and gently run your fingers over the palm of your hand. Feel the difference?

This is because the palm of your hand has Meissner's corpuscles, just like the foreskin and frenulum. They are what make our fingers and palms so sensitive, as well as our lips, anus, and other opening of the body.

The foreskin has 4 times of those nerves than the palm. Now you can imagine what amazing pleasure the foreskin gives the man. Its mutilation.
Well if you feel it enhanced your Sex life including master-bation? Those who are circumcised..... must be downright numb . Certainly early in adult life. It did NOT help somewhat pre-mature issues I had....to lose these nerves..... or ability to INSTANTLY be UP to the ACT AT HAND or better yet with a partner..... pun intended. But we do learn control, how to intensify, hold out longer for ourselves and partner etc.

If there is a study that UN-CIRCUMCISED men are LESS LIKELY later in life to use Viagra or Cialis? Perhaps a point on a few extra nerve endings help?

But we ALL know where the MAIN NERVE ENDINGS of pleasure are in our Phallus. that actually is exposed MORE after circumcision......

By the way.... your use of the term "Mutilation" is getting old...... it is not even remotely affiliated with that awful African female so called.... circumcision. That is a mutilation for a ill conceived purpose that is painful in sex for life. So IT IS OFFENSIVE. but your right to say "mutilation" for males....is offensive to 80% or more of American males..... we all get your point but..... sexually WE ARE JUST FINE WITH OUR CUT PHALLUS. SO ARE OUR PARTNERS.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2016, 08:52 PM
 
82 posts, read 247,342 times
Reputation: 87
The most sensitive part doesnt get exposed, it gets cut off. When its come to female circumcation. Not only the worst form of it is called mutilation, the UNO also consider the removement of the clitoris hood mutilation. Its funny that circumcised men are so afraid to accept this. Women would never act in such a way and would fight for their rights. As long you act like this little children will never be safe from the barbaric procedure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2016, 05:43 AM
 
2,427 posts, read 783,770 times
Reputation: 3114
VillaD_Rock, if you want to go through life uncircumcized, go right ahead, but just know that the rest of us are happy having been circumcized and that our sex lives are just fine. If I had to do it all over again, I would still have my son circumcized. Thus far I only have granddaughters but if a grandson comes along I surely hope he is circumcized too. I hate to think of the poor kid going through life looking like an anteater.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2016, 07:54 AM
 
Location: The analog world
15,551 posts, read 8,734,436 times
Reputation: 20850
That's cruel and unnecessary. Some posters are a bit strident about their choice, but let's not degrade people on the basis of their physical appearance. The uncirc'd penis is perfectly fine, as is the circ'd penis. Both allow for a satisfying sex life. It's a cosmetic choice, one that parents have to make every day for their newborn sons and should not be made to feel guilty about. Neither should grown men and women be tossing about terms like anteater to describe the unaltered penis. What is this? A middle school locker room? Sheesh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2016, 09:24 AM
 
2,427 posts, read 783,770 times
Reputation: 3114
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomparent View Post
That's cruel and unnecessary. Some posters are a bit strident about their choice, but let's not degrade people on the basis of their physical appearance. The uncirc'd penis is perfectly fine, as is the circ'd penis. Both allow for a satisfying sex life. It's a cosmetic choice, one that parents have to make every day for their newborn sons and should not be made to feel guilty about. Neither should grown men and women be tossing about terms like anteater to describe the unaltered penis. What is this? A middle school locker room? Sheesh!
You are correct. What I said was uncalled for and for that I apologize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2016, 09:49 PM
 
Location: U.S.A., Earth
4,342 posts, read 2,608,470 times
Reputation: 3809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biker53 View Post
I fail to understand the seeming hysteria over baby boys being circumcized. It is not even remotely mutilation. As has been said, if "natural" is somehow better, why do most women shave their legs and armpits? Why do most men shave their beards? Being hairy is natural. Why do people get tattoos and piercings? To me that is far more in the realm of mutilation than is circumcision. Uncircumcized is less sanitary and the anteater look is downright strange. It may be natural but so aren't a lot of things we don't do anymore.
You're really going to compare a hair cut to a circumcision? Most folks would argue cutting hair is hardly the same thing. For one thing, do men and women get local anesthesia when they shave their beards, legs, and go for a hair cut? Do they scream in pain when they take a razor of barber scissors to have their hair removed?


Tattoos are a whole other thread. Let's try not to derail the thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2016, 09:51 PM
 
Location: U.S.A., Earth
4,342 posts, read 2,608,470 times
Reputation: 3809
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildColonialGirl View Post
Because since Kellog's anti-masturbation campaign most American men have been circumcised. Men are super defensive about their penises, so when the woman gets pregnant with a boy and starts considering circumcision, when she tells her partner she doesn't want to do to their child what was done to him, that is a hugely confrontational moment. Imagine admitting that your parents tortured yo as a newborn and permanently affected your ability to feel sex. So the women are cautious, the men are defensive, and another baby ends up cut.

As you can see below, they are super defensive!
These "campaigns" always get to me. Last thing on my mind about this was when it's revealed that the DeBeers campaign needed to sell diamonds, so they came up with a marketing scheme to make men's worth to women tied into a diamond ring. Gotta admit... it was brilliant. It was never some ancient tradition that they tried to make it out to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2016, 01:36 AM
 
82 posts, read 247,342 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by steeps View Post
Well if you feel it enhanced your Sex life including master-bation? Those who are circumcised..... must be downright numb . Certainly early in adult life. It did NOT help somewhat pre-mature issues I had....to lose these nerves..... or ability to INSTANTLY be UP to the ACT AT HAND or better yet with a partner..... pun intended. But we do learn control, how to intensify, hold out longer for ourselves and partner etc.

If there is a study that UN-CIRCUMCISED men are LESS LIKELY later in life to use Viagra or Cialis? Perhaps a point on a few extra nerve endings help?

But we ALL know where the MAIN NERVE ENDINGS of pleasure are in our Phallus. that actually is exposed MORE after circumcision......

By the way.... your use of the term "Mutilation" is getting old...... it is not even remotely affiliated with that awful African female so called.... circumcision. That is a mutilation for a ill conceived purpose that is painful in sex for life. So IT IS OFFENSIVE. but your right to say "mutilation" for males....is offensive to 80% or more of American males..... we all get your point but..... sexually WE ARE JUST FINE WITH OUR CUT PHALLUS. SO ARE OUR PARTNERS.....
To call it mutilation is not offensive if it would save even one child. Dont care how bad you feel. In some countries the clitoris hood of the female is removed like in egypt for hygiene, prevention of stds and cleanliness. The same reason for male circumsicion in the USA. This procedure is the equivalent of male circumcision and done in hospitals. Both lose their prepuce. In the Usa it was legal in the past but it was rightfully banned. But this is called mutilation, so why not male circumcision. Do you think we should be quit about to not be offensive to those circumcied women. The main nerve endings are IN the phallus. How do you stimulate it. Cut it open and rub it or what. You cant even accept that you lost the most sensitive part of your penis. The 5 most eregenous parts of the penis are on the foreskin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top