Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:40 PM
eok eok started this thread
 
6,684 posts, read 4,247,048 times
Reputation: 8520

Advertisements

If you get an infectious disease, can you have just enough immunity to reduce the symptoms, but still suffer some symptoms because you aren't completely immune? Or is immunity more like an on-off switch, that you either are or aren't immune, period?

If you have partial immunity to a staph infection or flu infection, what kind of reduction of symptoms would you have, that would indicate you had partial immunity? The kind of staph infection that gives you a rash and makes you sick: could it be reduced to just giving you a rash without making you sick? Or the kind of flu infection that gives you extreme exhaustion, muscle weakness, and other symptoms: could it be reduced to just some symptoms and not others? Or could it be reduced to a shorter duration of some symptoms?

Is there a general rule, for how to tell a disease is reduced by partial immunity, vs being a milder strain of the same disease?

If you get a flu shot, then get infected by a different strain of flu than the ones covered by the shot, some people say you will have milder symptoms. Is that what's meant by partial immunity? What exactly do they mean by milder symptoms? A lower frequency of coughing or sneezing? Being able to get out of bed and not being totally exhausted? A lower temperature fever? But even if the symptoms are milder, they last the same number of days?

Last edited by eok; 10-18-2016 at 10:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
There is no way to tell whether you have "partial immunity" or not. Some diseases you get once and are highly unlikely to get them again, like measles. Others you can get more than once, such as whooping cough.

There may be genetic factors that make it harder for a particular bacteria or virus to set up an infection or cause symptoms. For example, there are some people who have genetic mutations that prevent HIV infections and some who have genetic features that allow infections with HIV that never progress to AIDS.

Many infections do not cause symptoms in a significant number of people, including influenza. Researchers are trying to identify the genes that may affect that.

Al Hero - finding the flu genome

Then again, some infectious agents are just less aggressive.

Milder symptoms means fewer symptoms, less severe symptoms, or shorter duration of illness.

https://www.wired.com/2015/01/vaccin...-unvaccinated/

"Your antibody levels might not be high enough to completely protect you, but they’ll still help—the CDC has seen vaccinated patients with measles who only get a rash for about an hour, says Wallace."

The rash usually lasts 3 to 5 days in unvaccinated people.

A vaccine can cause you to produce antibodies that might be active against strains not included in the vaccine itself. That can provide partial protection against other strains.That is being seen with HPV vaccine. Fortunately, many vaccines protect against all the potential strains. Measles is one of those.

Last edited by suzy_q2010; 10-18-2016 at 11:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,855 posts, read 65,802,767 times
Reputation: 19378
There is a village in England where a few people were immune to the bubonic plague. Researchers are studying the DNA of their descendents see if they can isolate anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernBelleInUtah View Post
There is a village in England where a few people were immune to the bubonic plague. Researchers are studying the DNA of their descendents see if they can isolate anything.
It's not just one village, and it appears to be the gene that protects against HIV, too.

Here you go:

Evolution: Library: Double Immunity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 10:36 AM
 
10,228 posts, read 6,309,606 times
Reputation: 11286
Which came first the chicken (previous infection) or the egg (gene)? Probably with flu it's a combination both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 10:51 AM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,323,454 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
It's not just one village, and it appears to be the gene that protects against HIV, too.[/url]
I've been in HIV research and it's called the CCR5-Δ32 mutation. The C-C chemokine receptor type 5, CCR5, on the surface of your T-cells, is one of the main ways HIV infects your T-cells. The virus also uses CXCR4 sometimes.

With this mutation, the CCR5 receptor becomes nonfunctional, which in turn, protects against certain strains of HIV (there's many different strains). CCR5 Δ32 has an (heterozygote) allele frequency of 10% in Europe, and a homozygote frequency of 1%.

The only person to be "cured" of HIV, known as the Berlin patient (although he is American), had HIV and was also dying from acute myeloid leukemia (AML), then he underwent a hematopoietic stem cell transplant which almost killed him, but he survived and the donor actually had the CCR5-Δ32 mutation, so after the donors cells engrafted into his bone marrow, the HIV inside of him couldn't infect his new T-cells.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by eok View Post
If you get an infectious disease, can you have just enough immunity to reduce the symptoms, but still suffer some symptoms because you aren't completely immune? Or is immunity more like an on-off switch, that you either are or aren't immune, period?

If you have partial immunity to a staph infection or flu infection, what kind of reduction of symptoms would you have, that would indicate you had partial immunity? The kind of staph infection that gives you a rash and makes you sick: could it be reduced to just giving you a rash without making you sick? Or the kind of flu infection that gives you extreme exhaustion, muscle weakness, and other symptoms: could it be reduced to just some symptoms and not others? Or could it be reduced to a shorter duration of some symptoms?

Is there a general rule, for how to tell a disease is reduced by partial immunity, vs being a milder strain of the same disease?

If you get a flu shot, then get infected by a different strain of flu than the ones covered by the shot, some people say you will have milder symptoms. Is that what's meant by partial immunity? What exactly do they mean by milder symptoms? A lower frequency of coughing or sneezing? Being able to get out of bed and not being totally exhausted? A lower temperature fever? But even if the symptoms are milder, they last the same number of days?
I can answer part of this post.

If you get a flu shot and get infected by a different strain, there may be some cross-over protection from the vaccine, and in general your symptoms may be milder, e.g. less cough, shorter duration of body aches, fever, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:49 PM
 
Location: TOVCCA
8,452 posts, read 15,034,390 times
Reputation: 12532
The Spanish Flu of 1918 that killed 50 million worldwide mostly killed people under 40, instead of older people, the usual victims of influenza. Why? Scientist believe that a slightly earlier version of that flu in 1899, called the Russian Flu, gave people alive then a partial immunity to the later Spanish Flu.

Other "descendants" of the Spanish Flu, like the Asian Flu of 1957, the Hong Kong Flu of 1968 and the Swine Flu of 2009 have also likely conveyed similar partial immunity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2016, 01:09 PM
 
13,496 posts, read 18,180,430 times
Reputation: 37885
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
I've been in HIV research and it's called the CCR5-Δ32 mutation. The C-C chemokine receptor type 5, CCR5, on the surface of your T-cells, is one of the main ways HIV infects your T-cells. The virus also uses CXCR4 sometimes.

With this mutation, the CCR5 receptor becomes nonfunctional, which in turn, protects against certain strains of HIV (there's many different strains). CCR5 Δ32 has an (heterozygote) allele frequency of 10% in Europe, and a homozygote frequency of 1%.

The only person to be "cured" of HIV, known as the Berlin patient (although he is American), had HIV and was also dying from acute myeloid leukemia (AML), then he underwent a hematopoietic stem cell transplant which almost killed him, but he survived and the donor actually had the CCR5-Δ32 mutation, so after the donors cells engrafted into his bone marrow, the HIV inside of him couldn't infect his new T-cells.
Perhaps I have simply missed the news. But I have not heard that this treatment has been tried on others with HIV as a means of arresting the disease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2016, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevxu View Post
Perhaps I have simply missed the news. But I have not heard that this treatment has been tried on others with HIV as a means of arresting the disease.
It's a matter of risk. HIV can now be controlled with medication that has much less risk than a stem cell transplant.

Also, finding a matching donor who also had the protective mutation would be extremely difficult.

It was just serendipity that the guy who was cured of HIV had a donor with the mutation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top