Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 03-22-2007, 04:04 PM
 
Location: WPB, FL. Dreaming of Oil city, PA
2,909 posts, read 14,057,186 times
Reputation: 1033

Advertisements

Condoms, STD, International Case Studies Showing Condom Ineffectiveness Against HIV/AIDS, etc

http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/cl...resource1.html

WARNING: In order to completely and accurately describe the subject matter, this document contains explicit information about human sexuality which is not appropriate for minors or for persons who are morally vulnerable to such material. If those types of words offend you, read no further and just remember that abstinence is all you have to worry about.

Some good excerpts:

The Underlying Problem. It is common knowledge among health professionals that sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs), some of which are incurable and/or fatal, have found fertile ground to multiply in societies that permit and even celebrate all forms of permissive sex.

If condoms are so effective at preventing pregnancy and AIDS transmission, why do nations that stress their use continue to experience a rapidly-escalating rate of teen pregnancy and an exploding AIDS epidemic?

"Counting on condoms is flirting with death." -- Dr. Helen Singer-Kaplan, founder of the Human Sexuality Program at the New York Weill Cornell Medical Center, Cornell University.

Although latex condoms appear to occasionally be permeable to the AIDS virus, by far the greatest danger of infection lies in their propensity to burst, tear and slip off. Contraceptive Technology tallied the results of fifteen studies involving a total of 25,184 condoms used during heterosexual intercourse and found that 4.64 percent of all of the condoms broke and 3.44 percent of them partially or completely slipped off, for a total of 8.08 percent, or about one in twelve.

According to Contraceptive Technology, the condom's user effectiveness rate is 85 percent. This means that, under real-world conditions, a woman whose sexual partners use condoms for every act of sexual intercourse has a 15 percent chance of becoming pregnant in a year.


Probability of Pregnancy Over Time for Women
Whose Sexual Partners Always Use Condoms

Time Span Probability

1 year 15 percent
2 years 28 percent
3 years 39 percent
4 years 48 percent
5 years 56 percent
10 years 80 percent

When United States Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders was Arkansas Health Director from 1987 to 1992, she pushed condoms by every means possible, including in 24 high schools. The results were predictable. The teen pregnancy rate in Arkansas rose 17 percent between 1989 to 1992, the syphilis rate among teenagers rose 130 percent, and the HIV rate rose 150 percent

"After reviewing the extensive literature on contraception, some variation in results is found. Reported failure rates for condom use vary from about 2 to 35 unplanned pregnancies per year, but a conservative consensus reveals a rate in the range of 8 failures per 100 users each year in the general population. Simple mathematics would conclude that after five years, the number pregnant with this method would be five times the yearly rate. Thus, after five years of condom use, there would be about forty pregnancies in this group of 100 real people ..."
--Stephen Genuis, M.D. "What About the Condom?" Risky Sex (2nd Edition) [Edmonton, Alberta: KEG Publishing, 1991].

"Dr. Richard Gordon, International AIDS Conference presenter and University of Manitoba professor, concluded after live studies that red dye testing demonstrated that seminal fluid leaks out of even properly-fitted condoms both prior to and after orgasm."
--Beverly Sottile-Malona. "Condoms and AIDS." America, November 2, 1991.

A Federally-funded UCLA study of the effectiveness of 29 major condom brands showed that reliability ranged from a high of 98.9% to an incredible low of 21.3%.
--"Condom Reliability." Los Angeles Times, June 29, 1988.

Figure 4: Experts Speak on the Ineffectiveness of the Condom at Preventing AIDS and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases

"Professionals and the public alike have been misled into believing that sex with a condom is safe ... considering the 10% pregnancy rate with the use of condoms, this creates a dangerous false sense of security. We consider it irresponsible to suggest to anyone that condoms are entirely safe ... advising persons that it is safe to have sex with condoms is false, provides an erroneous sense of security, and can kill partners."
--Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, Fall 1986, page 164.

"As has been discussed, condoms do not offer protection for diseases that are transmitted by skin to skin contact such as human papilloma virus and herpes simplex virus, frequently found throughout the genital area in infected individuals. No degree of condom education will curb the transmission of these organisms."
--Stephen Genuis, M.D. "What About the Condom?" Risky Sex (2nd Edition). Edmonton, Alberta: KEG Publishing, 1991.

"The officials note that condoms have been widely rejected as a method of birth control because they frequently fail, and say the devices may be no better -- in fact, may be worse -- at curtailing AIDS. They warn that sexually active men and women should not assume that they are protected simply because they use prophylactics ... The safe-sex message just isn't true. You're still playing a kind of Russian roulette. Instead of having six bullets in the chamber, you have one."
--Bruce Voeller, M.D., researcher with the Mariposa Research Foundation, quoted in Lindsey Gruson. "Condoms: Experts Fear False Sense of Security." The New York Times, August 18, 1987.

"Condoms failed to prevent HIV transmission in three of 18 couples, suggesting that the rate of condom failure with HIV may be as high as 17%."
--James J. Goedert, M.D. "What is Safe Sex?" New England Journal of Medicine, October 21, 1987, page 1,340.

"The condom was useless as a prophylactic against gonorrhea and even under ideal conditions against syphilis."
--Nicholas J. Fiumara, M.D., Massachusetts Department of Public Health. "Effectiveness of Condoms in Preventing V.D." New England Journal of Medicine, October 21, 1971, page 972.

The effectiveness of condoms at preventing AIDS is obviously much lower than their effectiveness at preventing pregnancy, for two primary reasons;
A couple can conceive during only a fraction of the menstrual cycle (the "fertility window"), about five to seven days per cycle. It is possible, however, to be infected with HIV at any time during the menstrual cycle.
A sperm cell is massively larger than an HIV virus. The head of a sperm cell is about 3,000 to 5,000 nanometers in diameter, and an HIV virus is about 100 to 120 nanometers in diameter (1 nanometer = one billionth of a meter).

The inherent, naturally occurring flaws in natural rubber (latex) range from 5 to 70 microns in diameter. The average sperm cell is about 5 microns in diameter, and the average AIDS virus is about 0.1 micron in size. This means that, in terms of size, an AIDS virus can pass through a latex flaw as easily as a house cat can walk through an open double garage door.

Genital chlamydial infection is the most common bacterial STD in the United States, and is the leading cause of preventable infertility and ectopic pregnancies. Half a million new cases of chlamydia (the most common sexually transmitted disease) are reported each year.31
Genital warts (condyloma acuminata) are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), the most common viral STD in the United States, accounting for three million new cases each year. HPV is present in an estimated 50 percent of all sexually active young women, and, as with other STDs, is associated with multiple sexual partners and with earlier intercourse.
There are about 400,000 new cases of gonorrhea in the United States each year, many of which are caused by strains resistant to treatment, and up to one-fourth of all infected men have no symptoms. Gonorrhea can also infect other mucous membranes, including the mouth. The disease can have extremely serious consequences if left untreated, including sterility, pelvic abscesses and severe health problems for infants born to infected mothers.32
Hepatitis B is a particularly dangerous problem in some developing countries. It can lead to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, cancers, hepatic (liver) failure and death. There is no cure for Hepatitis B, and up to 20 percent of the general population in many developing countries show signs of infection.
Herpes genitalis is caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV) and infects about 30 million people in the United States today, most of whom show no symptoms. Those who do show symptoms may have painful ulcers in the genital or mouth area.
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a result of infection with other STDs and viruses/bacteria such as gonorrhea and E. Coli. PID afflicts one million American women each year, 20 percent of whom require hospitalization. PID also inflames the Fallopian tubes and is a leading cause of ectopic pregnancy.
Syphilis, one of the deadliest STDs, recently reached its highest level in 40 years, with 134,000 people in the United States newly infected in 1990.33 Untreated syphilis can lead to rashes, lesions, paralysis, aneurysms, blindness and death.

But declarations of an epidemic of STDs are certainly not exaggerated. With more than 100 million people infected with one or more of 20 STDs in the United States alone, it is unrealistic to expect that a paper-thin, nearly weightless sheath of polyurethane or latex will slow down the epidemic.

The only way to completely eradicate all STDs is to follow God's plan for our sexual lives: Abstinence before marriage and fidelity after.

Of course, the sex educators and condom sellers tell us that this is not a "realistic" solution.

They are wrong.

Since abstinence/fidelity is the only solution that will work, it is the only realistic solution as well. Perhaps if the health professionals struggle unsuccessfully for another decade or two trying to contain the STD epidemic with impractical means, they too will reach the same conclusion. Unfortunately, the price of their education will be steep indeed -- millions of lives needlessly lost and more millions of lives spent in unnecessary misery.


End of excerpt. Read at least my excerpt, if not the entire article. The final paragraph stating that abstinence is the only safe option has to be taken to mind and heart. I dont want to hear your excuses or that you refuse to believe what you dont want to hear. The fact remains that abstinence is the only safe option. Once you find your partner, the relationship must be monogamous and lifelong and both of you should be virgins up to this point.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2007, 08:22 PM
 
1,076 posts, read 3,546,111 times
Reputation: 1148
NAH, you need to start some church then you can preach and pass around the collection plate then you'll have your oil city money.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2007, 09:37 PM
 
Location: WPB, FL. Dreaming of Oil city, PA
2,909 posts, read 14,057,186 times
Reputation: 1033
A good reason why abstinence is the only way to go, unless mating for procreation:

http://www.mykamasutra-positions.com/injuries.html

Dozens of women get injuries during mating. These sad situations have nothing to do with crime. Usually injured women are faithful wives and girlfriends. Their mate partners are loving husbands and boyfriends, rather than rapists.

http://www.mykamasutra-positions.com...e_traumas.html

The variety of possible penile traumas is indeed astonishing. These can be breackage of frenulum, incised or stab wounds of penis, penis bruise, hypodermic breakage of carvenous body, penis dislocation, penis entrapment, injuries of *******, inverted testis and others.

The more so as some traumas can provoke a pain shock, which is likely to cause death.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11624436/


“A 64-year-old Italian woman presented to our department with a three-week history of sudden, severe lower back pain…” Turned out she had fractured her pelvis. “We were enlightened as to the aetiology [origins] of the fracture by a nuclear medicine technician who spoke Italian, to whom the patient had explained the nature of her complaint. The severe pain commenced after a rather physical sexual encounter with her husband.”

http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/20...tml&frame=true

An injury to your head could cause excess mating addiction or overactive libido.

http://www.cwfa.org/articles/623/CFI/cfreport/index.htm (broken link)

least 5,000 women die yearly in the U.S. from a sexually transmitted disease (STD)?

I am still googling more articles of diseases, injuries and death caused by mating!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2007, 09:58 PM
 
1,076 posts, read 3,546,111 times
Reputation: 1148
Ok nah, lotta good lines for somebody in that but google on my friend.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 12:27 AM
 
2,218 posts, read 5,384,991 times
Reputation: 1765
*smashes head against wall*

Nope, not gettin a hard on yet.

That would be awesome. Maybe I should ask my doctor how to get overactive libido.

Seriously man... There are a lot of things you can get.. Did you ever think of getting herpes from cuddling? If not you can... Because that's one of the only STDs I know of that you can get without having sex.

So you better not cuddle too much your lady could possible have herpes EVERYWHERE!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 12:30 AM
 
Location: WPB, FL. Dreaming of Oil city, PA
2,909 posts, read 14,057,186 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronzou View Post
*smashes head against wall*

Nope, not gettin a hard on yet.

That would be awesome. Maybe I should ask my doctor how to get overactive libido.

You wont live a long, healthy life that way, sorry to say. Condoms will just delay the inevitable but mate often enough and one will slip thru the cracks.
Oh and take an aspirin for that headache of yours
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 12:34 AM
 
2,218 posts, read 5,384,991 times
Reputation: 1765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need_affordable_home View Post
You wont live a long, healthy life that way, sorry to say. Condoms will just delay the inevitable but mate often enough and one will slip thru the cracks.
Oh and take an aspirin for that headache of yours
I don't need any drugs since I was just using context.

Anyways you did know that about herpes right? How you can get it by just touching someone?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 12:55 AM
 
Location: WPB, FL. Dreaming of Oil city, PA
2,909 posts, read 14,057,186 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronzou View Post
I don't need any drugs since I was just using context.

Anyways you did know that about herpes right? How you can get it by just touching someone?

Asking google.......

Other safe mating alternative activities include kissing, massage, cuddling, slow dancing, dating, holding hands, etc.


What Is Herpes? Herpes is a very common sexually transmitted disease that affects one in six North Americans. It is a chronic viral infection that can cause oral herpes and genital herpes. Oral herpes are commonly referred to as cold sores, and genital herpes result in blisters in the genital area. There are two viruses that cause herpes: herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) and herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2). Both these viruses cause similar symptoms, are quite easy to catch, and both can cause oral herpes and genital herpes. However HSV-1 usually is related to oral herpes, while HSV-2 is usually related to genital herpes. HSV-1, the more common form of herpes, is present in 90% of the population and in most cases is not acquired through sexual contact. Instead people often acquire it in childhood through brief contact with other children and adults who have herpes.

In the case of oral HSV-1, many of the approximately 100 million Americans who are infected acquired the virus when they were children. By the time they're adults, only some 5% of people are bothered enough to consider oral HSV-1 a medical problem, according to Spruance.

On a practical level, this means oral HSV-1 is often the most easily acquired herpes infection. Usually the first herpes simplex virus that people encounter, oral HSV-1, is typically spread simply by the kind of social kiss that a relative gives a child. Because children have no prior infection with any HSV type, they have no immune defense against the virus.

By the time they're teenagers or young adults, about 50% of Americans have HSV-1 antibodies in their blood. By the time they are over age 50, some 80-90% of Americans have HSV-1 antibodies.

If HSV infection is as easily transmitted from the mouth as from the genitals, then why do people take steps to prevent genital but not oral infection? Why don't we kiss through dental dams ?

"It's ironic, isn't it?" says Wald. "It's not about health, it's about social acceptability."

Scientists can tell us all day that the main difference between the two viral types is simply their site of preference-whether they typically occur above the waist or below. But the unspoken attitudes of our society send a different message. That's just the problem, social attitudes whisper. Below the waist is bad.

"People think of oral herpes as the "good" herpes and genital herpes as the "bad" kind," says Glover of the National Herpes Hotline. "It's partly that they don't understand the similarities between HSV-1 and 2. But it's also that good and bad is how our culture views sex and our bodies."

The inescapable fact is that HSV-1 is usually spread through contact with infected lips, while HSV-2 usually spread through contact with infected genitals. From a social point of view, the problem is not the disease; it's how you got it.

Whether we like it or not, the social prejudice against genital herpes, no matter which virus causes it, is a reality. "People have more trouble explaining to a new partner that they have genital herpes, even if it's HSV- 1, than if they have a cold sore," says Glover. "Just saying the word "genital" is like an anvil that pulls the sentence down".

Is this topic making you crazy? For people who have trouble dealing with social attitudes toward genital herpes, the blatant double standard society applies to oral herpes can be frustrating, to say the least.


***********

Therefore cuddling is safe because I am not in contact with any bodily fluids. Kissing carries the risk of oral herpes but most people already have it anyway
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 01:28 AM
 
2,218 posts, read 5,384,991 times
Reputation: 1765
Sorry kid, you CAN get it from just touching someone.

I know a few people who got it from going to tanning salons.

Because the company didn't clean it off before the next person got in.

You can't trust everything you read off of Google.

And besides you do know the STDs mutate right? There are about 4 or 5 different kinds of herpes now. If not more.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2007, 03:13 AM
 
Location: WPB, FL. Dreaming of Oil city, PA
2,909 posts, read 14,057,186 times
Reputation: 1033
Then that explains why 90% have herpes type 1. Ah well its rarely dangerous unlike the other STDs you get by mating. I think ill take my chances cuddling, its a million times safer than mating and just as much fun(who cares about being nude, women look 1000x better in pretty curve hugging dresses)
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top