U.S. Cities  
Merry Christmas!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-03-2009, 09:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
1,124 posts, read 913,688 times
Reputation: 497
CTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of lightCTR36 is a glorious beacon of light
A year ago my MD asked me if I wanted this vaccine for my then 16 y.o. daughter. I said NO WAY!! She is not sexually active. My daughter who was in the room said No, I am waiting till I am married She is 18 now and both she and I feel that was the best decision. I have now figured out that I am in charge of my own health and that of my children. I will not just take a drug b/c my MD said so. Oh if I could only write a book about how meds have screwed me up! Now, that I am off of them what a difference! I am actually healthy!!
People should take charge of their own health and not blindly trust the doctors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2009, 09:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
2,225 posts, read 821,332 times
Reputation: 1289
Morphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud ofMorphous01 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCInMyMind View Post
I am simply "repeating" what is stated in the reports, that many of the women had underlying conditions that were the cause of death. Many of the reports also state that the attending physicians do not believe that this particular vaccine caused the adverse advent, i.e. death or subsequent illness.

Unfortunately, sometimes the first symptom of a condition is death. Think of all the high school athletes who suddenly "collapse and die" on the field. Was it the Advil, that let's say he/she took for a headache, or was it the underlaying heart defect that was until that day was asymptomatic?

As I stated in my previous post, correlation does not often equal causation. This is precisely why the FDA conducts post-marketing surveillance of all drugs, including vaccines. Health professionals report any and all adverse events, that could be tied to a drug/vaccine, no matter how farfetched. Just because a health professional submits a report, it does not however mean that the adverse event was caused by the drug/vaccine.

The FDA continuously reviews these reports looking for "patterns." It is my understanding that to date, the FDA has determined that Gardasil does not cause a higher amount of adverse events, then one expects to see in this particular demographic. This could change as it did for (off the top off my head) the diabetes drug Rezulin, several years ago.

I fully understand what you are saying, as a matter of fact, the way you lay it out, your argument wins. Your argument wins because, like you said, the doctors did not report that they "feel" the vaccine was the cause of the problem. And see, that's the problem, and the rock bottom of the vaccine controversy, in that, this legal loophole (not accurately reporting) is used to avoid responsibility! Furthmore, in what interest does a doctor have in telling on himself and on his medical profession?

I have read through all the cases myself and many of these girls were perfectly healthy until they were inoculated! Quite a few girls died after the first dose within a 2 week time frame let alone made it through the 2nd and 3rd dose. Also, there is a pattern, in that, many girls died from the same complications (blood clots in lungs/heart) and experienced the same symptoms after the inoculation such as, stomach pains, weakness, and headaches.http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/d...L_20090616.pdf




Regardless, if you want to actually believe that the "FDA continuously reviews these reports looking for patterns", then all I can say to that is, yea, yea, tell it to the family's who lost there children!!


YouTube - Gardasil Vaccine Deaths
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 10:27 AM
Senior Member
Status: "Cogito Ergo Sum" (set 19 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cary, NC...10th beige house on the left
166 posts, read 65,570 times
Reputation: 221
NCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphous01 View Post
And see, that's the problem, and the rock bottom of the vaccine controversy, in that, this legal loophole (not accurately reporting) is used to avoid responsibility! Furthmore, in what interest does a doctor have in telling on himself and on his medical profession?
If a doctor has chosen to lie about a patient on a report, then he/she is in serious violation of ethics and the codes of standards and practices of his/her profession. He/she should have his/her license revoked. I have no reason to believe that the majority of doctors lied as you suggest.

Most people who enter the field of medicine (including myself) are dedicated to eradicating illnesses and suffering. It requires quite a commitment in terms of time and financial hardship to earn an M.D.

I have absolute sympathy for the families. I know firsthand what it is like to watch someone you love who was otherwise healthy on a Monday, end up on a respirator on a Tuesday. I also know firsthand the frustration of not knowing exactly what caused such an illness and wanting to "pin" it on something specific.

I just am not convinced that the vaccine is the cause of the adverse events, although I fully comprehend your concerns.

Last edited by NCInMyMind; 11-03-2009 at 11:29 AM.. Reason: wording
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 11:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Connecticut
1,466 posts, read 1,090,438 times
Reputation: 780
andthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to beholdandthentherewere3 is a splendid one to behold
Doctors aren't recommending it so freely now, because of several adverse reactions in healthy young women. We skipped the vax for my 18 year old dd, opting to wait a few years to see how well it was going. And apparently it isn't going so well, I occasionally see credible news reports about serious reactions. People should be informed of the risks before making their decision on whether or not to vax. I will say that one of my daughter's friends got the Gardasil vaccination, and was very sick for a few days afterwards.

Gardasil HPV Vaccine Faces Safety Questions - ABC News
On Wednesday morning, ABC News Chief Medical Editor Dr. Timothy Johnson said that he, too, would encourage parents to learn more about the shot before getting their daughters vaccinated......
Mod cut: copyright violation


2 ALS Cases May Be Linked to Gardasil Vaccine
[i]Oct. 16, 2009 (Baltimore) -- Researchers believe that there may be a link between a vaccine against cervical cancer and a rapidly progressive, fatal disease in two young women.
Mod cut: copyright violation

And from the Journal of the American Medical Association:

JAMA -- Mandatory HPV Vaccination: Public Health vs Private Wealth, May 2, 2007, Gostin and DeAngelis 297 (17): 1921
[i]However, it is important to emphasize that the vaccine is supported by limited efficacy and safety data. Clinical trials have thus far involved a relatively small population (<12 000 participants) for a limited period of follow-up (5 years). The vaccine has not been evaluated for efficacy among younger girls (aged 9 to 15 years).... Mod cut: copyright violations


Last edited by Viralmd; 11-03-2009 at 12:07 PM.. Reason: Copyright violation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 11:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
1,812 posts, read 611,921 times
Reputation: 752
coyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to beholdcoyoteskye is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTR36 View Post
A year ago my MD asked me if I wanted this vaccine for my then 16 y.o. daughter. I said NO WAY!! She is not sexually active. My daughter who was in the room said No, I am waiting till I am married She is 18 now and both she and I feel that was the best decision. I have now figured out that I am in charge of my own health and that of my children. I will not just take a drug b/c my MD said so. Oh if I could only write a book about how meds have screwed me up! Now, that I am off of them what a difference! I am actually healthy!!
People should take charge of their own health and not blindly trust the doctors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 03:03 PM
ino
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Way beyond the black stump.
306 posts, read 195,707 times
Reputation: 276
ino is a jewel in the roughino is a jewel in the roughino is a jewel in the roughino is a jewel in the roughino is a jewel in the roughino is a jewel in the rough
It's called 'taking responsibility for oneself' rather than following like good little subordinates to the system, and being spoon fed as much BS as one can consume.

For anyone who enjoys reading, try "Healthcare for Dummies" by David Bonello, and read up on Royal Raymond Rife. Hear Ye, Hear Ye, come ye all and see how well the 'establishment' looks after everyones' interests, OH, and bring plenty of money with you so we can keep you dumbed down and drugged up with whole range of 'goodies', we churn out bountiful supplies so there is plenty for everyone, and we're 'well' connected too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 03:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
361 posts, read 67,906 times
Reputation: 181
aqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura about
The question is, Is killing a small percentage of people AND risking side effects to another percentage of people WORTH preventing a disease?

What is your answer? Some people say yes. Mine is probably no, because unknown side effects come up eventually even if it does prevent diseases, and their consequences are unforeseen but horrible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 03:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
361 posts, read 67,906 times
Reputation: 181
aqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura aboutaqua0 has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCInMyMind View Post
I just am not convinced that the vaccine is the cause of the adverse events, although I fully comprehend your concerns.

So are you saying that if these girls who died HAD NOT TAKEN THE VACCINE, they'd still be dead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
Status: "Cogito Ergo Sum" (set 19 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cary, NC...10th beige house on the left
166 posts, read 65,570 times
Reputation: 221
NCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura aboutNCInMyMind has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by aqua0 View Post
So are you saying that if these girls who died HAD NOT TAKEN THE VACCINE, they'd still be dead?
Based on the cause of death stated on the reports, yes. As I've stated several times, correlation does not necessarily equal causation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 03:17 PM
◄▒█▄•◘○┘▒▀ ┘•◘○▒█▄█
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
5,799 posts, read 3,760,784 times
Blog Entries: 11
Reputation: 2685
pitt_transplant has a reputation beyond repute
pitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond reputepitt_transplant has a reputation beyond repute
70% of medical research on meds is funded by the people who manufacture them

If they do not like the current research team's results, they get another one.

Bias in the name of profit not people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top