U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:26 PM
 
2,022 posts, read 1,919,547 times
Reputation: 1260
Default Why was dueling outlawed?

By the time it fell out of favor it seemed to have become structured enough that it would have been impossible to disguise a murder as a duel. Both parties had to agree to take part, and they could back out at any time. Most of them didn't even end with a person getting killed. As I understand it at least a significant number ended with no one even harmed as both men could fire their guns into the air in the first round and end it there with their honor preserved simply by standing at the duel.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:30 PM
 
65 posts, read 153,460 times
Reputation: 36
I don't know, maybe because the government had a problem with people being killed
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:41 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine
9,258 posts, read 10,854,232 times
Reputation: 7364
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 09:04 PM
 
Location: bold new city of the south
4,837 posts, read 1,845,717 times
Reputation: 5370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Opinion or fact? It sounds good but . . . .
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 10:36 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
10,449 posts, read 5,959,722 times
Reputation: 7583
Why did society prefer that disputes be settled in courts of law rather than by the antagonists attempting to murder one another?


Perhaps for the same reason that we use police forces rather than vigilantes to cope with criminals?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 11:17 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine
9,258 posts, read 10,854,232 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddy5 View Post
Opinion or fact? It sounds good but . . . .

Fact. I've read several books on the history of dueling and have a couple around.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:34 AM
 
Location: Minnesota, USA
7,279 posts, read 7,153,483 times
Reputation: 5799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Actually, duelling was prohibited under the penalty of excommunication at the Council of Trent in the 16th c., before the formation of modern, democratic nation-states. It was outlawed because it is the wrongful taking of another's life, and therefore murder.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 02:49 AM
 
2,228 posts, read 1,850,590 times
Reputation: 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
However, it still happens regularly in present day, though power is used instead of powder.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 03:03 AM
 
5,887 posts, read 4,706,927 times
Reputation: 9572
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuburnAL View Post
By the time it fell out of favor it seemed to have become structured enough that it would have been impossible to disguise a murder as a duel. Both parties had to agree to take part, and they could back out at any time. Most of them didn't even end with a person getting killed. As I understand it at least a significant number ended with no one even harmed as both men could fire their guns into the air in the first round and end it there with their honor preserved simply by standing at the duel.
I would imagine that a more civil society felt that the rule of law should apply to everyone, and that settling disputes privately in a manner that could be fatal was more than a little barbaric.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 04:56 AM
 
19,394 posts, read 13,802,724 times
Reputation: 13150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visit a Library View Post
However, it still happens regularly in present day, though power is used instead of powder.
You're right the automobile is a much more effective killing machine than a dueling pistol, 40,000+ people a year can attest to its effectiveness at killing people.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top