U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:26 PM
 
3,807 posts, read 4,378,168 times
Reputation: 3253

Advertisements

By the time it fell out of favor it seemed to have become structured enough that it would have been impossible to disguise a murder as a duel. Both parties had to agree to take part, and they could back out at any time. Most of them didn't even end with a person getting killed. As I understand it at least a significant number ended with no one even harmed as both men could fire their guns into the air in the first round and end it there with their honor preserved simply by standing at the duel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:30 PM
 
65 posts, read 205,883 times
Reputation: 36
I don't know, maybe because the government had a problem with people being killed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 08:41 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine
9,525 posts, read 16,413,338 times
Reputation: 8233
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 09:04 PM
 
Location: bold new city of the south
5,172 posts, read 3,578,110 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Opinion or fact? It sounds good but . . . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 10:36 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
23,712 posts, read 14,079,686 times
Reputation: 13901
Why did society prefer that disputes be settled in courts of law rather than by the antagonists attempting to murder one another?


Perhaps for the same reason that we use police forces rather than vigilantes to cope with criminals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2010, 11:17 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine
9,525 posts, read 16,413,338 times
Reputation: 8233
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddy5 View Post
Opinion or fact? It sounds good but . . . .

Fact. I've read several books on the history of dueling and have a couple around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:34 AM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,653 posts, read 13,089,132 times
Reputation: 6526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
Actually, duelling was prohibited under the penalty of excommunication at the Council of Trent in the 16th c., before the formation of modern, democratic nation-states. It was outlawed because it is the wrongful taking of another's life, and therefore murder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 02:49 AM
 
2,243 posts, read 3,065,903 times
Reputation: 2086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Dueling allowed the stronger and more skilled to browbeat and intimidate those weaker and less skilled. It wasn't fitting behavior for a democratic society.
However, it still happens regularly in present day, though power is used instead of powder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 03:03 AM
 
9,999 posts, read 10,657,453 times
Reputation: 24304
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuburnAL View Post
By the time it fell out of favor it seemed to have become structured enough that it would have been impossible to disguise a murder as a duel. Both parties had to agree to take part, and they could back out at any time. Most of them didn't even end with a person getting killed. As I understand it at least a significant number ended with no one even harmed as both men could fire their guns into the air in the first round and end it there with their honor preserved simply by standing at the duel.
I would imagine that a more civil society felt that the rule of law should apply to everyone, and that settling disputes privately in a manner that could be fatal was more than a little barbaric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 04:56 AM
 
29,181 posts, read 32,248,853 times
Reputation: 23618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visit a Library View Post
However, it still happens regularly in present day, though power is used instead of powder.
You're right the automobile is a much more effective killing machine than a dueling pistol, 40,000+ people a year can attest to its effectiveness at killing people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $99,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top