U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Closed Thread
 
Unread 04-07-2012, 09:20 PM
 
890 posts, read 761,096 times
Reputation: 635
that Mountain Meadow Masscre gives me the creeps.

 
Unread 04-08-2012, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
15,782 posts, read 8,765,772 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angorlee View Post
that Mountain Meadow Masscre gives me the creeps.
Religious Zealots at their best, even the "Savages" the tried to hire to Massacre the settlers refused
 
Unread 04-09-2012, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
2,836 posts, read 1,656,808 times
Reputation: 2220
Perhaps the single largest unanswered question after more than a century and half is the involvement of Brigham Young. Critics say that Young ran Utah as dictator, and that a decision to execute a thing of such magnitude could have only come from him. Others say that because it was 300 miles from Salt Lake City to the masscre site. many days journey on horseback, Young was unaware of the situation, and that local leaders acted on their own.
 
Unread 04-09-2012, 07:03 PM
 
2,803 posts, read 1,858,781 times
Reputation: 6627
Quote:
Perhaps the single largest unanswered question after more than a century and half is the involvement of Brigham Young. Critics say that Young ran Utah as dictator, and that a decision to execute a thing of such magnitude could have only come from him. Others say that because it was 300 miles from Salt Lake City to the masscre site. many days journey on horseback, Young was unaware of the situation, and that local leaders acted on their own.
That's the question that has been asked by many and which no definitive answer exists. A circumstantial case can be made that he made the decision. A good case can be made that it was carried out by settlers in southern Utah on their own. I don't think anyone would ever find the equivalent of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that the massacre was ordered by him.

The Will Bagley book that I previously mentioned in my last post takes the position that he must have issued some kind of order. Other books take a totally opposite view.

What is clear is that Brigham Young sent a message by courier to the settlers in southern Utah telling them to allow the Fancher Party to pass through the territory unharmed. The message arrived after the massacre had occurred.

There is a larger question though that seldom gets addressed. That question is the overall moral responsibility of someone like Brigham Young to prevent something like this from occurring. Young was an extremely powerful man who knew virtually everything that was going on among his people. There were undoubtedly things that could have been done to prevent the massacre from occurring. Earlier statements by him given in a direct and powerful fashion would almost surely have prevented this tragedy. Until something like this takes place maybe its hard to imagine its a possibility. However, clearly more could have been done to have prevented this event.

The full truth is probably never going to be known.
 
Unread 04-10-2012, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
13,979 posts, read 10,325,702 times
Reputation: 6111
One of my favorite lines:

"'Give them one year, no more; and if after that they pollute our soil by their presence, make literally Children of the Mist of them"

- Major James Carlton

Some of my MO ancestors were involved in executing the Mormon Extermination Order. There was certainly very strong anti-Mormon sentiment at the time. Amazing we now have one running for president. Guess we've come a long way.

Last edited by CAVA1990; 04-10-2012 at 06:04 AM..
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
15,782 posts, read 8,765,772 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
One of my favorite lines:

"'Give them one year, no more; and if after that they pollute our soil by their presence, make literally Children of the Mist of them"

- Major James Carlton

Some of my MO ancestors were involved in executing the Mormon Extermination Order. There was certainly very strong anti-Mormon sentiment at the time. Amazing we now have one running for president. Guess we've come a long way.
So the Mormons were the victims at Mountain Meadow?
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Salt Lake City
11,596 posts, read 5,883,028 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
So the Mormons were the victims at Mountain Meadow?
This isn't a serious question, is it? Of course they weren't the victims at Mountain Meadows. They were the perpetrators. They had, however, been victims of extreme violence for years, and are the only religious group in the United States to have a government-sanctioned extermination order issued on them.
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Roscoe's House of Chicken and Waffles
15,899 posts, read 6,374,540 times
Reputation: 15995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
They had, however, been victims of extreme violence for years,.
Numerous people of faith have been the victims of extreme violence in this country. The Orange Riots spring immediately to mind.

The Ghost Dance preformed by the Plains Indians helped lead to the Wounded Knee Massacre.

I can't understand trying to link violence against Mormons as some sort of an excuse for the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (If that's indeed what you're trying to do. )
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Salt Lake City
11,596 posts, read 5,883,028 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
I can't understand trying to link violence against Mormons as some sort of an excuse for the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (If that's indeed what you're trying to do. )
Why did you think I was trying to do that? Someone asked if the Mormons were the victims in the Mountain Meadows Massacre. I said they weren't; they were the perpetrators, but that they had been victims at other times. Don't read anything more into that I said and you'll be just fine.
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
15,782 posts, read 8,765,772 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
This isn't a serious question, is it? Of course they weren't the victims at Mountain Meadows. They were the perpetrators. They had, however, been victims of extreme violence for years, and are the only religious group in the United States to have a government-sanctioned extermination order issued on them.
So that means the settlers who were massacred were asking for it?
You are apparently attempting to justify a massacre
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top