Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who was the best Speaker of the House from 1860-2007?
William Pennington 0 0%
Galusha A. Grow 0 0%
Schuyler Colfax 0 0%
Theodore Medad Pomeroy 1 3.33%
James G. Blaine 0 0%
Michael C. Kerr 0 0%
Samuel J. Randall 1 3.33%
J. Warren Keifer 0 0%
John Griffin Carlisle 0 0%
Charles Frederick Crisp 0 0%
Thomas Brackett Reed 1 3.33%
David B Henderson 0 0%
Joseph Gurney Cannon 1 3.33%
Champ Clark 1 3.33%
Frederick Gillett 0 0%
Nicholas Longworth 0 0%
John Nance Garner 1 3.33%
Henry T. Rainey 0 0%
Joseph Wellington Byrns 0 0%
William Brockman Bankhead 0 0%
Joseph William Martin Jr 0 0%
Sam Rayburn 8 26.67%
John McCormack 1 3.33%
Carl Albert 1 3.33%
Tip O'Neill 7 23.33%
Jim Wright 0 0%
Tom Foley 0 0%
Newt Gingrich 10 33.33%
Dennis Hasert 1 3.33%
Nancy Pelosi 2 6.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2007, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
7,731 posts, read 13,425,724 times
Reputation: 5983

Advertisements

In your opinion, who was the best Speaker of the House in history from 1860-2007?

Note: I spelled Hastert wrong in the poll.

Last edited by cottonwood2420; 12-17-2007 at 01:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2007, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Boise
2,684 posts, read 6,885,005 times
Reputation: 1018
Allright, go Newt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2007, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,210,109 times
Reputation: 7373
More of a History than a P&OC discussion. Thread moved to History.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2007, 03:15 PM
 
4,834 posts, read 6,120,761 times
Reputation: 2443
Thumbs up Tip O'Neill

Quote:
Originally Posted by cottonwood2420 View Post
In your opinion, who was the best Speaker of the House in history from 1860-2007?

Note: I spelled Hastert wrong in the poll.
Tip O'Neill with Sam Rayburn a close second
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 09:45 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,827,945 times
Reputation: 17241
Yes Tip,no question!!!!

TIP WAS THE BEST
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 11:24 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 25,999,446 times
Reputation: 6128
Dennis Hastert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 06:58 AM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,289,908 times
Reputation: 45726
Sam Rayburn. Followed by Tip O'Neill.

Newt Gingrich??? Really....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 08:34 AM
 
5,114 posts, read 6,086,237 times
Reputation: 7184
I'll admit I only really considered ones in the later 20th Century. Tip, Sam - Sam, Tip
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 10:52 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,672,468 times
Reputation: 14622
What's the criteria? What exactly is the measure for a Speaker of the House? If your party is in the Presidency then rubber stamp their agenda...if your party is not in the Presidency then block the other guys agenda (or try to)? Also, like the Presidency, the Speakership has changed radically over the past several decades. Back in Sam Rayburn's time, the Speaker was far less powerful (the reigns rested with the committee chairmen).

I would have to think that ones preference for a "good Speaker" is even more party affiliation based then ones choice for "good President" which often has some more objective measurements. At the end of the day, it's the Speakers job to advance the agenda of their party, not much room for "mavericking". In that light, Gingrich really would be among the best as would Champ Clark.

The nomination of Rayburn and O'Neill seems to be based solely on length of service more than any particular accomplishment. Of those two, I would choose Rayburn as he was masterful in bringing both sides of his party together, while forging a working relationship with the Republicans to get things done. Not sure I can forgive him for annointing LBJ, but all of the Speakers tend to have some blemishes, lol. I do have a deep respect for Tip O'Neill as a fellow BC grad and a man who fought voraciously for what he believed in, but I don't think he was the "best" Speaker, at least not by criteria I would assume are being used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 11:05 AM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,587,448 times
Reputation: 5664
It would take a lot of particularly focused reading
to ascertain this. Moreover, some of the strategic
nuances, especially pre-modern are likely not easily
identified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top