Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2016, 08:17 AM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
And if these same people would navigate the NYC subway today, they would be lost and ultimately run over by a car or something.

So what's your point? Everything was better before because SEAMEN knew how to use a sextant? (Which is actually not that hard to use.)
Try using a sextant at the bottom of the earth in foul weather on a drifting boat.
No, if the internet goes down, we'll all die. Nobody would be able to google how to make fire or use a sextant.

The subway is really the most challenging 21st century threat you could think of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2016, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,808,159 times
Reputation: 11103
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Thats reaching.
Likewise it's reaching that the so-called tough guys in 1916 all knew how to use a sextant. Just because a few resilient stranded seamen knew how to navigate with primitive equipment doesn't mean that everyone knew it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
Try using a sextant at the bottom of the earth in foul weather on a drifting boat.
No, if the internet goes down, we'll all die. Nobody would be able to google how to make fire or use a sextant.

The subway is really the most challenging 21st century threat you could think of?
If I'd have to, I could use a sextant, see where the sun sets, and adjust my course with the wind. If our lives depended on it, we probably all could do that.

The romanticism of the "old guard" is ridiculous with the assumption of that all men were supermen in the past and the men and women today are weaklings. The whole premise of this thread is that "kids today are so weak and losers, everything was better before, and even if my parents were tougher than me, boy, I'm tougher than these social media Millennials".

No, the 1916 tough guys might manage the subway, but not creating a backup copy of a hard-drive in 2016. That would be challenging for a 1916 tough guy.

Last edited by Ariete; 12-28-2016 at 08:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 10:57 AM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
Likewise it's reaching that the so-called tough guys in 1916 all knew how to use a sextant. Just because a few resilient stranded seamen knew how to navigate with primitive equipment doesn't mean that everyone knew it.



If I'd have to, I could use a sextant, see where the sun sets, and adjust my course with the wind. If our lives depended on it, we probably all could do that.

The romanticism of the "old guard" is ridiculous with the assumption of that all men were supermen in the past and the men and women today are weaklings. The whole premise of this thread is that "kids today are so weak and losers, everything was better before, and even if my parents were tougher than me, boy, I'm tougher than these social media Millennials".

No, the 1916 tough guys might manage the subway, but not creating a backup copy of a hard-drive in 2016. That would be challenging for a 1916 tough guy.
I think you are confusing tech savvy with being tough. The ability to back up a hard drive won't keep you alive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,727,332 times
Reputation: 6745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
Likewise it's reaching that the so-called tough guys in 1916 all knew how to use a sextant. Just because a few resilient stranded seamen knew how to navigate with primitive equipment doesn't mean that everyone knew it.



If I'd have to, I could use a sextant, see where the sun sets, and adjust my course with the wind. If our lives depended on it, we probably all could do that.

The romanticism of the "old guard" is ridiculous with the assumption of that all men were supermen in the past and the men and women today are weaklings. The whole premise of this thread is that "kids today are so weak and losers, everything was better before, and even if my parents were tougher than me, boy, I'm tougher than these social media Millennials".

No, the 1916 tough guys might manage the subway, but not creating a backup copy of a hard-drive in 2016. That would be challenging for a 1916 tough guy.
How many of today's SJ W's would voluntarily go over the top of a trench and run into machine gun fire? The majority of the adult male population in 1916 did just that.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,808,159 times
Reputation: 11103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
I think you are confusing tech savvy with being tough. The ability to back up a hard drive won't keep you alive.
Different perogatives, different times. Getting lost on the Tokyo subway won't keep you alive either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
How many of today's SJ W's would voluntarily go over the top of a trench and run into machine gun fire? The majority of the adult male population in 1916 did just that.......
The hell I know? I'm classified as a Millennial, I'm a former Boy Scout and spent a year in the military. I don't consider myself as a 'tough guy', but if my life depends on it, I'll learn to navigate with a sextant, as I know the basics. I'm also sure that my fellow millennials will toughen up if needed and not cry for their smart phones like the older generations want to think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 11:32 AM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,082 posts, read 10,747,693 times
Reputation: 31475
Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
How many of today's SJ W's would voluntarily go over the top of a trench and run into machine gun fire? The majority of the adult male population in 1916 did just that.......
Nobody ever said they were bright...loyal, maybe, and devoted to King and country...but not known for critical thinking. Not many, SJW or otherwise, would agree to do that today unless they were a religious fanatic, on drugs, or there was somebody behind them with a bigger machine gun. Send a couple drones and an air strike and it would be over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 12:42 PM
 
3,288 posts, read 2,359,123 times
Reputation: 6735
1916 tough guy would beat the living crap out of 2016 tough guy, unless the current guy has his boys around to help, plulls out his gun, knife, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 05:21 PM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
Different perogatives, different times. Getting lost on the Tokyo subway won't keep you alive either.



The hell I know? I'm classified as a Millennial, I'm a former Boy Scout and spent a year in the military. I don't consider myself as a 'tough guy', but if my life depends on it, I'll learn to navigate with a sextant, as I know the basics. I'm also sure that my fellow millennials will toughen up if needed and not cry for their smart phones like the older generations want to think.
I've actually been lost on a Tokyo subway. I survived and lived to tell the tale.
They had subways in 1916 by the way.

As a collective we no longer have the skills to survive without modern technology.
It's not possible to transport someone from 1916 here to face the dangers of backing up hard drives and navigating modern transit systems, however we could end up stuck without power, cellphones, and internet as if it were 1916.
If you get stranded on a desert island the skills and "toughness" of someone from 100 years ago would be preferred.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 05:32 PM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
Nobody ever said they were bright...loyal, maybe, and devoted to King and country...but not known for critical thinking. Not many, SJW or otherwise, would agree to do that today unless they were a religious fanatic, on drugs, or there was somebody behind them with a bigger machine gun. Send a couple drones and an air strike and it would be over.
They were plenty bright. This was the generation that invented airships, submarines, tanks, airplanes, cars, and dig the Panama Canal without computers or modern tools and equipment.
Charging over a trench is something expected of all soldiers in all time periods. The decision to send a drone over first or just do a bonzai charge isn't up to junior enlisted personnel regardless of critical thinking skills.

At least we could finish a war in less than 5 years back then. Now even with drones, stealth fighters and satellites we can't wrap them up in 15.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2016, 06:11 PM
 
Location: West of Louisiana, East of New Mexico
2,916 posts, read 3,000,773 times
Reputation: 7041
Quote:
Originally Posted by easthome View Post
Bigger and taller perhaps but not necessarily stronger, people tended to have to do a lot more manual labour 100 years ago than they do now, a lot of 21st century people are rather erm 'soft' around the edges, just look at how people complain about 'lack of air conditioning' in hotels and the such, I think mankind is 'generally' a lot 'softer' in the modern world. The wild west, Victorian London, The Roman empire - I imagine that a lot 'modern' people would find it tough living in those environments considering how a lack of Air Con is now such a problem.
The "average" person back then was not a couch potato. However, a "fit" person today versus a "fit" person from back then? No contest, 2016 wins. A 2016 person would have to adapt to 1916 conditions, but they'd certainly adjust. Besides, being "softer" means they have less bumps and bruises over their lifetime...the modern person would have fresh-legs so to speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top