Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2019, 07:41 PM
 
26,786 posts, read 22,545,020 times
Reputation: 10038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldgardener View Post
I'm a woman, and I wouldn't be happy if my husband was president. Why would you think all women would want that?? Women are people, and people are all different, you know.

And here lies the biblical answer why God is so weary of women.
He wants MEN to do his job, to serve HIM first and utmost, particularly when he has some purpose in mind for them.

And women want men to do what?
To serve THEIR interests first and utmost.

Why to be surprised then, when monotheistic religions ( Christianity including) put so many restrictions on women?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2019, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,119 posts, read 5,589,229 times
Reputation: 16596
Quote:
Originally Posted by karen_in_nh_2012 View Post
The only president I'd want to be married to is Josiah Bartlet ... and alas, he's a fictional character.

So I totally understand Martha Washington's point of view!

George W. Bush had a rough time competing with the popularity of the fictional president Josiah Bartlett, played by Martin Sheen, on "The West Wing". I heard many people say of Sheen's character, that he was the president they wanted.

But unfortunately, our system of producing presidents doesn't allow such a well-balanced and ideal individual to often make it through the gauntlet. If any such persons did succeed in reaching the office, the opposition would aggressively sabotage them. The concept of showing respect for a worthy opponent, is lost to history, if it ever really existed at all. Dirty tricks in politics is not something recently invented. Not just thousands of years ago were they pulling them, but I'd bet that even tribal politics in the Stone Age were underhanded and devious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2019, 08:00 PM
 
3,211 posts, read 2,977,890 times
Reputation: 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
Oh, because, you know---hypergamy.



I do hope you're kidding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2019, 04:00 AM
 
19,969 posts, read 30,217,900 times
Reputation: 40041
she was afraid the inaugural ball dress would make her look big
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2019, 05:03 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
5,725 posts, read 11,715,057 times
Reputation: 9829
In addition to both Martha and George's reluctance to take on the roles of first lady and president, logistics was a big factor in Martha not being at the inauguration. While his election was largely inevitable, Washington was not informed of the results of the electoral college until April 14, 1789, and he left Mt. Vernon for New York two days later. While he had appointed his nephew to run the plantation in his absence, Martha was left with the task of moving the family household, including selecting and outfitting the slaves that would accompany the family to New York. She left for New York in mid-May.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2019, 05:52 PM
 
2,893 posts, read 2,142,714 times
Reputation: 6907
as we all think the same we know the answer to this question about a person none of us know. however we are not telling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top