Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2019, 07:33 AM
 
158 posts, read 106,389 times
Reputation: 357

Advertisements

Sure they may not pay their debts, but by imprisoning them, they most certainly won't have any avenue to pay their debts, so wasn't it really very counterproductive to imprison people for not paying it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2019, 07:45 AM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,253,078 times
Reputation: 7764
Formal employment was rare in those days. Even if you didn't imprison the debtor, you probably wouldn't be repaid because he would never have the money.

Also consider that creditworthiness was harder to determine and much more informal, so the borrower himself had to exercise caution when taking out a loan.

Imprisonment was primarily a deterrent against taking out loans you would never be able to repay, and secondarily a punitive measure to give some satisfaction to the creditor and act as a warning to others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2019, 08:32 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,975,811 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msgenerse View Post
Why was "Debtors, prison" a concept in the old days?
It was just one step along the legality trail.
Quote:
...but by imprisoning them, they most certainly won't have any avenue to pay their debts
That's where the next step on the legality trail comes in: indenture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiki
The total number of European immigrants to all 13 colonies before 1775 was 500,000–550,000;
of these, 55,000 were involuntary prisoners. Of the 450,000 or so European arrivals who came voluntarily...48% were indentured.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent...n_the_Americas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2019, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
438 posts, read 376,611 times
Reputation: 2106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msgenerse View Post
Sure they may not pay their debts, but by imprisoning them, they most certainly won't have any avenue to pay their debts, so wasn't it really very counterproductive to imprison people for not paying it?
Depending on the time and place many methods were used to "pay off" the debt. Debtors prison was an option for those with repetitive problems of running up debts. Typically these individuals have already proven they couldn't possibly pay the amount for whatever reason so the prison was viewed as an option to keep them from creating more debts and "work off" the debt they had.

Some people were held until family could pay the debt off for them. Others like Mr. Rational pointed out became indentured servants that were sent away to colonies to pay off the debt. Most would work hard labor jobs within the debtors prison (the prison would have a workhouse portion) and work off their debt during their sentence.

Last edited by musicfamly5; 11-01-2019 at 10:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2019, 10:57 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 7 days ago)
 
35,629 posts, read 17,961,729 times
Reputation: 50652
Debtors prison was basically a way to get ne'er do wells off the streets, and provide a visible threat of punishment to others who might fall into poverty themselves.

Also, most were workhouses so the public could profit off the unpaid labor of the underclass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 02:30 AM
 
Location: Cebu, Philippines
5,869 posts, read 4,209,487 times
Reputation: 10942
Because the English were the cruelest basterds in the history of the world, complete devoid of compassion. And by the way, lived in the filthiest cites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,122,692 times
Reputation: 21239
It was a matter of treating an unpaid debt as a crime, the crime of theft. It isn't so unreasonable, we still have courts empowered to jail people who fail to pay child support.

If I borrowed 500 bucks from you and when it is time for it to be repaid, you say "I'm not paying", you are a thief. The specific reasons for why the debt isn't being paid is subordinate to the fact that you are out 500 bucks, just like you would be if I had stolen it from you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 03:36 PM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,306,076 times
Reputation: 45727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
It was a matter of treating an unpaid debt as a crime, the crime of theft. It isn't so unreasonable, we still have courts empowered to jail people who fail to pay child support.

If I borrowed 500 bucks from you and when it is time for it to be repaid, you say "I'm not paying", you are a thief. The specific reasons for why the debt isn't being paid is subordinate to the fact that you are out 500 bucks, just like you would be if I had stolen it from you.
I suspect that is how it was looked at back than.

However, there is a difference between three statements.

1. Can't pay;

2. Won't pay;

3. Will pay with some persuasion.

Someone who "cannot pay" court ordered child support will not go to jail. Someone either "won't pay" or "will pay with some persuasion" will be threatened by a judge and ultimately sent to jail if they refuse to pay.

I toured Colonial Williamsburg about a decade ago. One thing that has stayed with me is the jail. Even in the Colonial period they were getting away from imprisonment for debt. For example, there were special cells for debtors that were far nicer than the cells that existed for run of the mill criminals. Additionally, the only way imprisonment for debt worked was that the creditor had to agree to pay the incarceration costs of the debtor. If he refused to do so, the debtor remained free. Many merchants in this time period realized that this was a losing proposition. It was simply throwing good money after bad. So, in time, merchants on their own refused to exercise the option of having a debtor thrown in jail.

Our modern bankruptcy laws were an outgrowth of this process. Society finally reached a conclusion that it was better to set up a process that allowed those heavily indebted to wipe away those debts. Ordinarily, they must give up most of what they have to do so. However, if they are willing to do that, they received a discharge through the bankruptcy courts that washes away their debts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 04:00 PM
 
Location: North America
4,430 posts, read 2,707,461 times
Reputation: 19315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msgenerse View Post
Sure they may not pay their debts, but by imprisoning them, they most certainly won't have any avenue to pay their debts, so wasn't it really very counterproductive to imprison people for not paying it?
Well, the concept was deterrence, which is still a pillar of the criminal justice system.

Was it practical? Sort of, at least in theory.

However, to put it in context, in those days they were burning witches at the stake and hanging 8-year-olds for theft. Let's just say that the logic of crime and punishment in those days was still rather primitive. I'm not saying that our modern criminal justice system is the pinnacle of rationality, but it certainly demonstrates that we've learned at least a few lessons along the way and made some adjustments for the better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Vienna, Austria
651 posts, read 416,175 times
Reputation: 651
"Debtors, prison" was a concept in the old days because people were stronger and harder. Large part of people was employed to a difficult tedious work. Besides they fought with sabers and bayonets in war. Our ancestors had other customs and way of life than we have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top