Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-13-2009, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,062,199 times
Reputation: 5943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Jefferson Davis was never elected president of a western hemisphere nation. He was the president of an alliance for rebellion which failed in its attempt to make itself into a nation. It did not win foreign recognition, it did not win acknowledgement from the legal government it wished to overthrow. It only ever asserted nationhood, it never achieved it.

I thought that Britain was the only country that recognized its independence
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2009, 12:57 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,380 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 60996
No England did not. European (England and France) was one of Lincoln's foreign policy nightmares. Slavery was the holdup for England. As it was, England replaced southern cotton with Egyptian cotton for it's mills so recognition wasn't needed.

Last edited by North Beach Person; 04-13-2009 at 01:15 PM.. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2009, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
No England did not. European (England and France) was one of Lincoln's foreign policy nightmares. Slavery was the holdup for England. As it was, England replaced southern cotton with Egyptian cotton for it's mills so recognotion wasn't needed.
Had Egyptian cotton not been forthcoming or available for Britain, they might very well have rendered support to the CSA and, with quite a different outcome to the war. This is a rarely mentioned factor, which I had not heard referenced in quite a few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
What county in the United States came into existence and was named for a president on the day the president was inaugurated?
Before this thread drops off the menu, the answer I was looking for is Harding County, New Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,603,290 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Had Egyptian cotton not been forthcoming or available for Britain, they might very well have rendered support to the CSA and, with quite a different outcome to the war. This is a rarely mentioned factor, which I had not heard referenced in quite a few years.
Actually, Egyptian cotton was always available to Britain. The deciding factor just happened to be a bumper crop during 1862. Had it not been for a literal cotton glut, the British government was prepared to extend formal diplomatic recognition to the Confederacy. Another key point was that Britain was waiting to see whether the Confederate Army would pull off a tide-turning victory on the battlefield. Although there were some major victories on their part during 1861-62, the kind of rout being anticipated by Queen Victoria's government never happened. And that, combined with the cotton factor, wound up spelling doom for Mr. Davis & co.

Indeed, formal diplomatic recognition might have affected the conduct of the war greatly, since it would have been elevated into an international confrontation. France, then ruled by Napoleon III, was usually prepared to do anything Britain was not--and might easily have made an official alliance with the United States...thus kicking off what could conceivably have become the First World War!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,062,199 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
Actually, Egyptian cotton was always available to Britain. The deciding factor just happened to be a bumper crop during 1862. Had it not been for a literal cotton glut, the British government was prepared to extend formal diplomatic recognition to the Confederacy. Another key point was that Britain was waiting to see whether the Confederate Army would pull off a tide-turning victory on the battlefield. Although there were some major victories on their part during 1861-62, the kind of rout being anticipated by Queen Victoria's government never happened. And that, combined with the cotton factor, wound up spelling doom for Mr. Davis & co.

Indeed, formal diplomatic recognition might have affected the conduct of the war greatly, since it would have been elevated into an international confrontation. France, then ruled by Napoleon III, was usually prepared to do anything Britain was not--and might easily have made an official alliance with the United States...thus kicking off what could conceivably have become the First World War!

Probably
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Which raises this interesting question: With a genuine risk of a First World War, was the USA risking more than it could endure when it resisted the separation of the South? A determined stand that did NOT evolve into a World War only by the luck of the climate that year in North Africa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2009, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
857 posts, read 1,422,918 times
Reputation: 560
its an easy one but just to keep the game going

What two US presidents both died on July 4th??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2009, 11:45 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,380 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 60996
Jefferson and John Adams. 1826.

What were Adams' last words?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2009, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,560 posts, read 1,263,843 times
Reputation: 1424
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
What were Adams' last words?
Reputed to be "Thomas Jefferson still lives..." or a variation thereof. Some accounts have him merely mumbling Jefferson's name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top