Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-25-2008, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,291,129 times
Reputation: 11032

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
Lame idea. I seriously cant believe the NHL would even begin to consider that.
It's totally crazy. Sort of like having two baseball teams in the same city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2008, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Phoenix metro
20,004 posts, read 77,384,761 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
It's totally crazy. Sort of like having two baseball teams in the same city.
No, thats cool only as long as the two teams have been there since the beginning of time, like the Sox and Cubs. But plopping an expansion team down right smack dab in the middle of a hardcore Leaf city is a dumb idea. The new teams' market share will be virtually non-existant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2008, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,603,290 times
Reputation: 10616
This is the sort of thing that happens when television starts dictating policy to the league. Don't you think there are hardcore hockey fans in places like Quebec City and Winnipeg? They don't have NHL teams any more because they're not "big market" enough--they can't satisfy television's craving for ratings. You would think that putting another team in Toronto is a recipe for disaster, and you would be joined in this thought by an awful lot of people. Except for television executives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2008, 02:52 PM
 
Location: The Rock!
2,370 posts, read 7,761,075 times
Reputation: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
No, thats cool only as long as the two teams have been there since the beginning of time, like the Sox and Cubs. But plopping an expansion team down right smack dab in the middle of a hardcore Leaf city is a dumb idea. The new teams' market share will be virtually non-existant.
There is also the line of thinking that since Leaf tickets are exhorbitant and almost impossible to get, a new team would pack 'em in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2008, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,528,010 times
Reputation: 2038
Well, if Leaf tickets are that hard to get, put the other team in Hamilton. Then you would have about 6 to 7 millon people within an hour drive. That would make a little sense.
I think I'd put a team in Winnipeg or Quebec before Toronto, if they could get new arenas. 2 more expansion teams, one in the US, one in Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 03:15 PM
 
9,091 posts, read 19,223,544 times
Reputation: 6967
didn't winnipeg build a new stadium already?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2008, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,882 posts, read 38,032,223 times
Reputation: 11650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Laker View Post
didn't winnipeg build a new stadium already?
Yes, but apparently/unfortunately it’s about 2 or 3,000 seats too small for the NHL. It seats about 15,000 if I recall. Plus where they’ve located it (right downtown on a narrow lot) there is little possibility for expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,291,129 times
Reputation: 11032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
No, thats cool only as long as the two teams have been there since the beginning of time, like the Sox and Cubs. The new teams' market share will be virtually non-existant.
Like the NY Jets, NY Mets, or the Islanders, or the Devils or the Ducks.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2008, 12:59 PM
 
Location: USA
2,362 posts, read 2,996,482 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingsnkali View Post
The Maple Leafs are the type of team/management you get when they are fully supported for losing eternally. Much like the Chicago Cubs.

I think Winnipeg or Quebec City should get a team back ahead of Toronto.
Agreed. It still bothers me that they moved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2008, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Sheffield, England
2,636 posts, read 6,649,782 times
Reputation: 3336
It would be good to have another team in Canada but it'd be stupid putting it in Toronto. Almost everyone from Toronto who is a hockey fan is an ardent Leafs supporter so they wouldn't have a fan base. If they're going to put another team in Canada it should go to Winnipeg or Quebec, where hockey should never have left in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top