Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-18-2013, 09:30 AM
 
Location: cumming,ga
20 posts, read 78,903 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

Happy Firday!!!

If the home value is 375k, some of it is the land value around 75k.
So when we take home insurance should we tell them the house value 375k-75k = 300k
or the full value?

Please advise and provide your thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-18-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,572 posts, read 47,641,955 times
Reputation: 48209
You should insure for the replacement of the structure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 09:36 AM
 
14,465 posts, read 20,640,988 times
Reputation: 7995
My insurance company did not give me a choice.
I was required to insure the house for it's replaceable value, the cost to re-build.
Then I was required to accept the coverage for the contents. Again, they made that decision.
The contents were required to be insured for x% of the insurance on the house itself.

You can ask about the land but even in the case of a fire your land won't be destroyed.
If you are in a high flood area where there could be extreme erosion, or near places where landslides could ruin or destroy your land, that may be a different insurance animal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Alaska
5,356 posts, read 18,541,295 times
Reputation: 4071
If you end up under-insuring, they may deny your claim. We went ahead and and insured for property value as it was closer to replacement cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 10:08 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,945,062 times
Reputation: 43661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Chick View Post
You should insure for the replacement of the structure.
^^This.
But also have the name of a few independent adjustor's in the file
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 12:09 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,030,832 times
Reputation: 13166
Insurance companies don't insure land as it's pretty hard to steal or burn. You need to insure your structures, contents, and liability.

Insurance companies don't insure for erosion which is in almost every case caused by flooding--which is not covered under a regular home owners policy but must be purchased separately through a broker from the US government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 01:05 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,035,628 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Chick View Post
You should insure for the replacement of the structure.
Same thing with the contents. I went through a house fire and part of that process was an inventory of everything in the house. They had the cash value of items listed next to the replacement costs and most were in the 30% to 40% range. If you don't have replacement costs you're going to be screwed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 02:07 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,030,832 times
Reputation: 13166
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Same thing with the contents. I went through a house fire and part of that process was an inventory of everything in the house. They had the cash value of items listed next to the replacement costs and most were in the 30% to 40% range. If you don't have replacement costs you're going to be screwed.
Keep in mind also that many types of items have a "cap" on them unless you buy additional coverage. Computer equipment, jewelry, camera equipment, wine, artwork, stamp and coin collections, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 03:05 PM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,294,149 times
Reputation: 10695
You insure for replacement cost, not market value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2013, 07:59 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,833,505 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Chick View Post
You should insure for the replacement of the structure.
Yep;as otherwsie if the worse happens you will only get the depreciated value on damaged property. 20 year roof and its 5 years old you have deprecation of 25% as example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top