Thank you so much for the pic help. Will get to it this week. It certainly will aide further understanding with this material.
I hear you TrapperL. I almost wanted to give my response on parity with an oil refinery.
My daughter lives between San Antonio and Austin. I know well from that which you speak. More than once I've burned my rear-end leaning against a car.
The only consideration why any home built the same way for Anywhere USA has everything to do with fiberglass or other loose cavity fill insulation and orientation for vapor barrier concerns. Texas is particularily familiar with mold issues specifically due to vapor barrier problems and resulting condensation. And that means dew point, dry or damp environment, such as Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Costa Rico, Nevis, etc.
Of course window feature and various layering types can favor northern vs southern, but as much as the house goes - Anywhere on the planet per se' is fair game... and configuration orientation order is King. Technically speaking there is only one configuration, but it may favor cold, hot, or both climates. If both, not all of any single configuration elements may be necessary. It just depends on whether heat is prominent, or cold. This total approach is tunable for all.
This is why I formatted this thread was so as others may learn the the individual elements, respective to climate. If they know why, how, and when -- the reader public at large will be better equipped. I get scores of DMs from contractors all over the world and for 97% of the cases they are asking some great questions and getting the relative answer presented in the posts.
I don't know where you are located specifically so I looked up climate data for Laredo Texas. Because its just about the hottest place in America, second fiddle to just a few other areas.
Climate Laredo - Texas and Weather averages Laredo Month/Average High in Deg F/Average Low in Deg F.
J-67/46; F-72/50; M-80/57; A-88/64; M-94/71; J-98/76;
J-99/77; A-100/77; S-93/73; O-86/65; N-76/55; D-68/47
I looked deeper (
Heating & Cooling Degree Days - Free Worldwide Data Calculation) to ascertain daily thermal conditions to determine if Thermal mass interior aor exterior might work. No doubt about it, yep improving TM would serve the area well. Please understand, I am not talking about brick veneer house. Brick as used in status quo is a huge energy parasite albeit a beautiful, very durable exterior finish. Brick, configured correctly can behave very very differently.
Suffice to say, ordinary brick veneers can hit 140-160 deg F in the day and sustain that heat well into an evening. How many readers of this post have ever wondered why its so freak'in hot at night in the home? Heck, most AC systems run full time from the time they set foot in the home after work and the darn things runs consistently into the early morning hours.
If you do not know what a degree day I provided a recommended link:
Degree Days - An Introduction. In any event I see from June through August degree days vary from 13 to 21 for Laredo TX. That means the daily temps were moderately high to high but also that there are most any night opportunities to exploit.
The exterior mass need not be all that much necessary to average the day's temps. Getting past the noon til 5 period is a remarkably easy thing for an effective mass to achieve. If you have peak period billing TM will offset cooling at night to carry through the peak periods saving money in two ways.
In sun beaten States, the matter is all about getting the sun off (& keeping it off) things you don't want super-heated. After that the matter defers to other steps to degrade thermal potential. Mass or no mass still applies. Texas is a big state for radiant barrier use. However, poster Restrain hit upon a something to which I responded. Radiant barriers reflect energy back to source. Energy not reflected is absorbed and converted to thermal sensible heat. In opaque building systems the problem is not necessarily direct radiation, rather re-radiation. Controlling re-radiation and incorporate favorable emissivity within a structural systems is very easy.
Emissivity is a physical property of material demonstrating capacity of radiatively emitting stored heat. For example: Consider a 100 watt bulb emitting 5,000k color frequency light. Without emissivity control the bulb will propagate full consumed/absorbed power to emit 5,000K frequency at, say, 1000 lumens. Apply 2-3% emissivity- the 5,000k frequency is still present; however, the lumens is reduced to 20-30 emission, or emitting 2-3 watts of 5,000K light.
This tech is one of many tech missing from a status quo energy efficient shell. Again, we are still very early in all this but understanding E relative to TM -- a bigger picture begins to form and make complete sense. There's more I guarantee it. Just because one cannot see through a a thing does not mean the thing is not subject to the same physics as that which one can see through. Opaque systems are still subject to the same electromagnetic wavelengths as windows; only the order, layering, and mass are different. I the few of you that get this - do not run off half cocked thinking you've got the whole picture - you do not.
Can a system have additional E, TM, or "R" planes within a single composite? Of course. Not only those but other properties as well. In past posts I stated: "Configurations that do not lose or gain heat like status quo..." To get exceptional thermal properties one must engage other and more affordable means done so in different configurations. Most certainly, that's where all this is going.
Nevertheless, whether dealing in frigid tundra or tropical forest, there is only one building system able to perform in every climate because dew point and associated btu relationship are highly predictable and unequivocally controllable.
Loved the oil thing by the way. I liked it because while science may at times seem counter intuitive, inform as to understand and become nimble with acquired knowledge only then can one appreciate events and consequences... only then can one create productive predictable repeatable positive progress.
TrapperL, you are one wise old dog! Nice points in your discussion, thanks again.