Quote:
Originally Posted by East of the River
I think it depend on where in the country you are. Here in New England Foundations and site work are expensive, as Such it's usually cheaper per sqft to build 2-3 stories. This is not the case at all in southern states.
|
It is pretty common to try to minimize site costs regardless of location. In the NE where stone filled soils are common and there is a need to protect against freezing the costs will be higher than in areas with easy to excavate soils and minimal risk of extreme temperatures. What can't be denied is that there still a need for some preparation of the site.
In contrast when someone proposes building in such a way that increases costs needlessly that can easily be avoided with just a little more knowledge. Whether information comes from a local builder or other investigations does not really matter.
In some ways there are aspects of the thread that are similar to the sorts of projects those learning architecture are asked to complete. Professors love to ask students to challenge assumptions. Posters here have offered information that could influence the OP's assumptions. Many architecture schools have several competitions for students to showcase things like low cost ways to build homes for folks in rural areas, or after a disaster, or those who'd otherwise be homeless in urban areas. While none of the situations directly translate into the OP's desire to place 'living space above a garage for the low costs and pleasant views / breeze' the fact that all such projects even when targeting flood ravaged areas like New Orleans do not build out a lower level --
https://www.google.com/search?q=arch...es+New+orleans