Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-16-2011, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Houston/Brenham
5,819 posts, read 7,174,032 times
Reputation: 12309

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by homeinatx View Post
Houses are built to last 10-20 years<snip>
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh u View Post
Regardless... if homes there only last 10-20 years, then what do home owners do? They just pack up and move to a new home every 20 years? Or tear down their house and rebuild?
homeinatx's reply was a bit exaggerated. Certainly some homes are built better than others, just as, for example, cars. But even a less expensive home has to meet the building codes. And any home will last 50-60 years, and probably more*. You may be replacing items sooner in a less expensive home, but the home will stand for many, many years. There are still Ford Pintos on the road, too.


*Because I can hear the replies already, let me state... Yes, there are exceptions. Sometimes you get a POS builder who built such crap that the house needs leveling 5 years after completion. Or a builder who "forgot" to test the soil and the house is shifting. Or the roof is separating from the frame (geez, is THAT what I was supposed to do with those hurricane straps?). I'm not going to defend every builder or exception. IN GENERAL, houses are built to code and will last far longer than we will. They need maintenance, they need mechanicals updated & replaced, they need care. But they WILL last.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2011, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Sugar Land
2,465 posts, read 5,761,220 times
Reputation: 2733
Is all about cheap labor and unfortunately every builder does it. No matter if is a 20 Mil house or 600K you will always see the same crew of illegal and some legal mexicans doing the labor regardless of how much the charge for the house. You're not going to see german craftsman in the 20Mil house, that's for sure. Unless the government does something about it this will continue and is nothing that the consumer can do about it.
I've done the math in my house, I have an idea of material costs and I know what labor was paid, so all I can say that is a pretty lucrative business for the builder by using cheap labor. They do make a lot of money. But lastly a lot of that will also transfers to us the consumers as in CHEAP housing comparing with the other states....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2011, 03:27 PM
 
177 posts, read 423,172 times
Reputation: 104
Houses in Houston are cheap and they all look so nice. Bricks on the outside, nice wrought iron stair ways on the inside. Granite counter tops, cement drive way.

Houses here in Minneapolis are expensive and are not so nice looking. They use cheap labor and cheap material here too but it just so darn expensive here. I will take cheap and nice looking over expensive and ugly any day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2011, 05:46 PM
 
483 posts, read 1,555,302 times
Reputation: 1454
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugeTon View Post
Houses in Houston are cheap and they all look so nice. Bricks on the outside, nice wrought iron stair ways on the inside. Granite counter tops, cement drive way.

Houses here in Minneapolis are expensive and are not so nice looking. They use cheap labor and cheap material here too but it just so darn expensive here. I will take cheap and nice looking over expensive and ugly any day.
Yeah same here. I think the typical house is nicer in Houston than here in Calif but I think it's because there is so much new home construction there, and newer homes of course look nicer because they incorporate the latest fashion trends. The one thing I didn't like is that they tend to skimp on the neighborhoods there. I saw some 475k homes in Sugarland (475k would represent 2x the median). The homes were very nice but the neighborhoods weren't as nice as what I'd expect them to be. At twice the median you should have wide streets, 16000+ sq foot lots, and a wide-open look. The 4800 sf homes were cramped together on 7500 sf lots. I didn't like that. Also, when people park on the street and the lots are small, it makes the hood look more cramped. So you get a gorgeous home in a neighbohood that looks a bit like a neighborhood of median homes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2011, 06:04 PM
 
Location: The Greater Houston Metro Area
9,053 posts, read 17,111,665 times
Reputation: 15226
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh u View Post
Yeah same here. I think the typical house is nicer in Houston than here in Calif but I think it's because there is so much new home construction there, and newer homes of course look nicer because they incorporate the latest fashion trends. The one thing I didn't like is that they tend to skimp on the neighborhoods there. I saw some 475k homes in Sugarland (475k would represent 2x the median). The homes were very nice but the neighborhoods weren't as nice as what I'd expect them to be. At twice the median you should have wide streets, 16000+ sq foot lots, and a wide-open look. The 4800 sf homes were cramped together on 7500 sf lots. I didn't like that. Also, when people park on the street and the lots are small, it makes the hood look more cramped. So you get a gorgeous home in a neighbohood that looks a bit like a neighborhood of median homes
I will not argue with this - I do not know why the builders are so stingy with lot size - and it gets worse every year. This is why I like homes pre-2005 as opposed to the last few years - the lots keep getting smaller. In the state of wide,open spaces, that is ridiculous and just an indication of builder-greed. "Why put in 10 homes in this area - when we can cram in 15?" Homes built in the 70's and earlier have wonderful lots (usually). Now you have 3500 square feet homes with a tiny grass strip in the back. Think how close that makes the back neighbor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2011, 06:35 PM
 
177 posts, read 423,172 times
Reputation: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh u View Post
Yeah same here. I think the typical house is nicer in Houston than here in Calif but I think it's because there is so much new home construction there, and newer homes of course look nicer because they incorporate the latest fashion trends. The one thing I didn't like is that they tend to skimp on the neighborhoods there. I saw some 475k homes in Sugarland (475k would represent 2x the median). The homes were very nice but the neighborhoods weren't as nice as what I'd expect them to be. At twice the median you should have wide streets, 16000+ sq foot lots, and a wide-open look. The 4800 sf homes were cramped together on 7500 sf lots. I didn't like that. Also, when people park on the street and the lots are small, it makes the hood look more cramped. So you get a gorgeous home in a neighbohood that looks a bit like a neighborhood of median homes
I have noticed that too. Just been to Houston last week and went to see Cross Creek Ranch in person, man, they build beautiful houses out there. They built some half a million $ houses on not very big lots too. That probably explains why most of subdivisions put up cedar fences to conceal privacy.

Coming from Minneapolis, the lot that my house is currently sitting on is big, I tend to like the small size lots down in Houston. I just hate spending an hour outside mowing the lawn, excluding tending the landscape. I would rather spending time inside sipping margaritas and play with the kids than outside doing yard work. I love doing yard work but my ideal is an hour or less not more. Another issue is Houston is hot so having a small yard means less time watering the lawn, save money while still having a beautiful landscape. What good to have a big yard and to the point where it costs too much to water then let it goes brown. The problem is many of us always want big. Big house, big lots, big car, oh, and big Mac. Not my cup of tea anymore. Lesson learned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2011, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX (Bellaire)
4,900 posts, read 13,665,848 times
Reputation: 4186
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugeTon View Post
I have noticed that too. Just been to Houston last week and went to see Cross Creek Ranch in person, man, they build beautiful houses out there. They built some half a million $ houses on not very big lots too. That probably explains why most of subdivisions put up cedar fences to conceal privacy.

Coming from Minneapolis, the lot that my house is currently sitting on is big, I tend to like the small size lots down in Houston. I just hate spending an hour outside mowing the lawn, excluding tending the landscape. I would rather spending time inside sipping margaritas and play with the kids than outside doing yard work. I love doing yard work but my ideal is an hour or less not more. Another issue is Houston is hot so having a small yard means less time watering the lawn, save money while still having a beautiful landscape. What good to have a big yard and to the point where it costs too much to water then let it goes brown. The problem is many of us always want big. Big house, big lots, big car, oh, and big Mac. Not my cup of tea anymore. Lesson learned.
$1100/year in Houston gets you a guy who will take care of your lawn and landscaping for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top