Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-23-2016, 07:48 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,544,005 times
Reputation: 12157

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
I already read that. And that's still doesn't make up for the fact that two different studies have completely different results. Who are you to say that one is more accurate than the other? You can't know that, I can't either, but I will lean towards the more logical answer. DFW as a whole yes of course it's gaining a lot of population. But by one demographic that before those 5 years was only half of that at 33,000, yeah that's 100% illogical unless there's a specific reason for it. Like I said, this could be a group of jobs, an agency. Puerto Rico is definitely going through an emigration which is bringing many Puerto Rican all throughout the USA, but this doesn't account to going from 33,000 to 50,000 in 5 years. Now, Puerto Ricans are growing in Texas and Louisiana both because a certain group of companies have been contracting them and providing their housing and transport. However this doesn't account for a 17,000 growth in 5 years. 41K would signify an 8,000 growth and that number actually makes sense.
17,000 out of 500,000 also makes sense and it's logical. Perhaps there is an emigration but it's the longer running estimate out of the two that the census has been using? Also, the fact that they don't give you 2011, 2012, and 2013 numbers on there for the 1 year estimate to determine how that demographic grew is what is confusing you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2016, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,893 posts, read 6,595,852 times
Reputation: 6410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
17,000 out of 500,000 also makes sense and it's logical. Perhaps there is an emigration but it's the longer running estimate out of the two that the census has been using? Also, the fact that they don't give you 2011, 2012, and 2013 numbers on there for the 1 year estimate to determine how that demographic grew is what is confusing you.
No it's not confusing. It's 2014 results. Reading two results based on the same year and getting different estimates isn't confusing at all. And no it doesn't work that way. Houston has grown more than 600,000 since 2010, and it still wouldn't make sense if Houston had the 17,000. Random opulation surges from 1 demographic are triggered by a specific reason. And they are bringing Puerto Ricans to Texas but it wouldn't grow at that rate. When a demographic is around 33,000 it doesn't magically grow 17,000 in a 5 year span. Unless there was something that brought them there. Which there is with these jobs that are providing their housing too but it still wouldn't be at that rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2016, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,544,005 times
Reputation: 12157
I still don't see anywhere where you deem it's illogical for 17,000 PR's to have moved to DFW since 2010. Because it's hard to believe that a small but growing demographic couldn't' have grew that fast? Usually, the 1 year estimate is the most accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2016, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,893 posts, read 6,595,852 times
Reputation: 6410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I still don't see anywhere where you deem it's illogical for 17,000 PR's to have moved to DFW since 2010. Because it's hard to believe that a small but growing demographic couldn't' have grew that fast? Usually, the 1 year estimate is the most accurate.
Already stated why. 33,000 isn't particularly small, it's just not enough to grow 17,000 in a 4-5 year span. Really the estimates in general aren't very accurate because they miss out so much because of the way the studies are made. The official census is the closest to accurate but is still not completely accurate in determining demographics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 06:23 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,799 times
Reputation: 10
I heard they are even thinking about opening the Dominican Embassy in Houston again. Dominican are coming here from ny and Santo Domingo. I know this for a fact. I even have 8 family members coming this year from rd. They want to live in Houston because what they have been hearing about the growth here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 08:08 AM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,779,367 times
Reputation: 3774
Recently, I've been seeing A LOT of black Hispanics here. Also, I've been seeing several Hispanics (Hispanics that look like Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans) that aren't Mexican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 08:28 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,789,738 times
Reputation: 4474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy205 View Post
Recently, I've been seeing A LOT of black Hispanics here. Also, I've been seeing several Hispanics (Hispanics that look like Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans) that aren't Mexican.
How can you be sure they weren't Mexican? There are some that look atleast partially black.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,544,005 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
Already stated why. 33,000 isn't particularly small, it's just not enough to grow 17,000 in a 4-5 year span. Really the estimates in general aren't very accurate because they miss out so much because of the way the studies are made. The official census is the closest to accurate but is still not completely accurate in determining demographics.
I didn't say it is accurate. I said it's the most accurate. Meaning, it's more accurate than any other estimate that census uses because it judges by a basis of one year after the other. 33,000 is small if you rank it against other metros. DFW's 33,000 isn't even one of the top 10 populations in the nation. It's probably barely top 20. I still haven't seen any logical reason why it hasn't grown by 17k. But this seems to be going in circles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 10:20 AM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,779,367 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunion Powder View Post
How can you be sure they weren't Mexican? There are some that look atleast partially black.
They looked different than Mexicans. I get Central Americans confused with Mexicans, but these people look like Dominicans. A lot of them have hazel and blue eyes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 11:05 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,789,738 times
Reputation: 4474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy205 View Post
They looked different than Mexicans. I get Central Americans confused with Mexicans, but these people look like Dominicans. A lot of them have hazel and blue eyes.
So do a lot of Mexicans. There's no such thing as a Mexican look. It is a very ethnically diverse country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top