Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2016, 11:50 AM
 
288 posts, read 433,926 times
Reputation: 340

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugarlandbubba View Post
With so many energy related buildings on the sublease market, I believe energy companies which do not have a presence or their headquarters in Houston will move to here while the rent is cheap.
Why isnt that the case right now then?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2016, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,292 posts, read 7,500,301 times
Reputation: 5061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scientific View Post
Why isnt that the case right now then?

It is...

Energy companies ride out crude slump by doubling down in Houston
The global crude slump battering oil towns across the country has created a paradoxical effect in Houston, home to more than 3,700 energy companies, including some of the world's largest. While the city has lost thousands of oil and gas jobs since oil prices collapsed by half over the past year, its energy capital status makes it a logical place for companies to consolidate operations as they shutter farflung plants and offices to save money.
That means scores of workers and their families are moving to the area. "When you ride out the storm, you ride it out on high ground, and in the energy industry, Houston is the highest ground of all," said Patrick Jankowski, vice president of research at the Greater Houston Partnership.
New research funded in part by the U.S. Department of Commerce suggests that regions known as bastions for specific industries finance in New York, for example, or movie production in Hollywood tend to be more resilient in tough times. The researchers, who called such areas cluster cities, studied how they fared from 2003 to 2011 a period that included a major economic slump. According to an incomplete preliminary report released in May, the research showed that such areas were less vulnerable to economic shocks and recovered faster.
For energy companies looking to cut costs, Houston remains the most attractive place to consolidate operations because of its robust network of companies across the oil and gas chain from firms that drill and produce to plants that manufacture equipment used in the oil patch, said Bill Gilmer, director of the Institute for Regional Forecasting at the University of Houston.

Energy companies ride out crude slump by doubling down in Houston That article is dated Oct 2015

http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/n...o-houston.html

TransCanada closes on Houston’s Columbia Pipeline Group | Fuel Fix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,890,870 times
Reputation: 7257
This is interesting and I wonder is this is why Houston gained 5,000 jobs instead of losing them. So yes there are layoffs and yes Houston is affected but other places are affected worse (Tulsa or Midland for instance) and Houston scavenges the scraps left after the slaughter in those towns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,292 posts, read 7,500,301 times
Reputation: 5061
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
This is interesting and I wonder is this is why Houston gained 5,000 jobs instead of losing them. So yes there are layoffs and yes Houston is affected but other places are affected worse (Tulsa or Midland for instance) and Houston scavenges the scraps left after the slaughter in those towns.
It's not "scavenging" Those jobs in "Tulsa and Midland" were created by the industry core in Houston in the first place.

I think this could very well explain how the areas population is still growing as rapidly as it has been without any real reported job growth. I don't think when these people are transferred or relocated it is counted as job creation since the jobs were already existing.

new employment figures are out and the July YOY job growth numbers are 13,300 which means as many as 8,000 jobs were created in Greater Houston last month alone, many of them were in professional business services ,

"Employment grew slightly in Greater Houston over the past year as moderating job losses in oil and gas were offset by gains in services such as health care, hotels and restaurants, the Labor Department reported Friday.
Overall, the metropolitan area gained 13,300 jobs over the 12 month period that ended in July, an annual growth of 0.4 percent — an improvement from June’s year-over-year increase of 0.2 percent and better than analysts expected. Drilling activity has increased modestly in Texas, following a rebound in oil prices, and many oil company executives have suggested that the worst is over, after reporting abysmal earnings in the quarter that ended in June."

"Analysts noted other hints of improvement in the Houston area. Professional and business services, which has shed 2.3 percent of jobs over the year, experienced noticeable gains in July. That included
an increase in architectural and engineering jobs, which can foreshadow gains in construction and population growth."

PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News

Last edited by Jack Lance; 08-20-2016 at 12:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX (Bellaire)
4,900 posts, read 13,736,420 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
This is interesting and I wonder is this is why Houston gained 5,000 jobs instead of losing them. So yes there are layoffs and yes Houston is affected but other places are affected worse (Tulsa or Midland for instance) and Houston scavenges the scraps left after the slaughter in those towns.
Midland is actually doing fairly well since the Permian is one of the few areas that is still seeing a lot of capital investment. Its mostly the field offices that took the brunt of it so smaller towns are affected more, probably the town worst hit on a per capita basis by headquarter layoffs would be Oklahoma City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 11:57 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
Oh wow! That's astounding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,292 posts, read 7,500,301 times
Reputation: 5061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Oh wow! That's astounding
In which way is that "astounding" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,890,870 times
Reputation: 7257
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_ut View Post
Midland is actually doing fairly well since the Permian is one of the few areas that is still seeing a lot of capital investment. Its mostly the field offices that took the brunt of it so smaller towns are affected more, probably the town worst hit on a per capita basis by headquarter layoffs would be Oklahoma City.
source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
No one is getting it worse than North Dakota....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Unplugged from the matrix
4,754 posts, read 2,976,993 times
Reputation: 5126
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_ut View Post
Midland is actually doing fairly well since the Permian is one of the few areas that is still seeing a lot of capital investment. Its mostly the field offices that took the brunt of it so smaller towns are affected more, probably the town worst hit on a per capita basis by headquarter layoffs would be Oklahoma City.
Still negative job growth in Midland though, along with the Dakotas. And yeah, OKC was hit hard l along with Tulsa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top