|

08-17-2009, 11:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
15 posts, read 3,774 times
Reputation: 11
|
|
Smoking ban?
I suppose I could look on some Texas or Houston govt website, but I figured this would be easier.
I'm from Chicago, moving to Houston in a few months. In IL there's a public smoking ban in bars/restaurants/etc.
So is there a smoking ban down there?
|
|

08-18-2009, 02:23 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston
2,074 posts, read 744,126 times
Reputation: 513
|
|
Yes. 
|
|

08-18-2009, 06:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A little suburb of Houston
2,584 posts, read 2,200,702 times
Reputation: 784
|
|
|
Yep! You must also be at least 50 ft from the entrance of a building before lighting up in public as well.
|
|

08-18-2009, 07:28 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
4,562 posts, read 1,741,412 times
Reputation: 4583
|
|
|
Yes...Its one of the best things that happened IMHO. Lived in Chicago when it happened there too...It was nice to go out and not smell like an ashtray when you got home. Also no stinky clothes the next morning.
|
|

08-18-2009, 08:38 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
638 posts, read 341,077 times
Reputation: 293
|
|
|
I believe it's only in the city limits of Houston. I've gone to some places that are in Houston but outside the city limits that still allow smoking. I wish it would be banned everywhere.
|
|

08-18-2009, 11:43 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
15 posts, read 3,774 times
Reputation: 11
|
|
|
Awesome...very good to hear!
|
|

08-18-2009, 12:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston, TX
1,313 posts, read 594,329 times
Reputation: 932
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPodz
Awesome...very good to hear!
|
I disagree, but then I'm totally opposed to the whole concept of a nanny state.
|
|

08-19-2009, 01:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
226 posts, read 101,270 times
Reputation: 94
|
|
Government We Need yOu!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasTheKid
I disagree, but then I'm totally opposed to the whole concept of a nanny state.
|
I wish there were more people that thought like you TexasTheKid.
I don't smoke and quit about five years ago but I agree with you. I am a let the free market decide kind of person.
If the non-smoking patrons are fed up with it and want the bar owner or restaurant owner to stop allowing other patrons to smoke in their establishments then why do we need a law? The proprietor can stop the smoking in his place or let him figure out how he can make both smoker and non smoker happy. [Ventilated smoke rooms, patios, etc.]
If the the establishment owner told the non smokers NO, then there would be non smoking bars and restaurants pop up to fill the void. A perfect free market solution.
I think that we forget that we can do things on our own without the stupid nanny government getting involved. Government is not reason it's force.
|
|

08-19-2009, 09:33 AM
|
|
Up on the Mountain
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Not where I want to be
1,105 posts, read 560,758 times
Reputation: 332
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirelez
I wish there were more people that thought like you TexasTheKid.
I don't smoke and quit about five years ago but I agree with you. I am a let the free market decide kind of person.
If the non-smoking patrons are fed up with it and want the bar owner or restaurant owner to stop allowing other patrons to smoke in their establishments then why do we need a law? The proprietor can stop the smoking in his place or let him figure out how he can make both smoker and non smoker happy. [Ventilated smoke rooms, patios, etc.]
If the the establishment owner told the non smokers NO, then there would be non smoking bars and restaurants pop up to fill the void. A perfect free market solution.
I think that we forget that we can do things on our own without the stupid nanny government getting involved. Government is not reason it's force.
|
Owners of restaurants never take sides when it comes to patrons. In this economy and even before, they can't afford to take one side over the other so they just let things ride. We need "smoking" laws because people who smoke don't care about those of us who don't smoke. Some how they justify the right to ruin their own health AND others around them.
|
|

08-19-2009, 11:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
226 posts, read 101,270 times
Reputation: 94
|
|
Agree to Disagree Whatdya say
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsMtnsOnTheMind
Owners of restaurants never take sides when it comes to patrons. In this economy and even before, they can't afford to take one side over the other so they just let things ride. We need "smoking" laws because people who smoke don't care about those of us who don't smoke. Some how they justify the right to ruin their own health AND others around them.
|
I wholeheartedly disagree with you. Government shouldn't tell owners how to run their businesses. If you hate cigarrettes stay out of the restaurant and if enough people stop going there the owner will have to compromise. Especially in this economy!
Whats next, "Stop smoking in your front yard it offends me and gives me cancer?" The government doesn't need to come referree every detail. If you allow that they will get bigger have more power and demand more money and liberty from you.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|