Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineboy
Eastern Idaho is the most conservative area of the state, but that is because of the religious influence and their proximity to Utah.
But regardless Idaho is a pretty laid back state with a live and let live attitude.
|
Your closing comment about "live and let live" is very important! That is a "liberal" attitude by the very definition of the word "liberal." It exists in the very conservative-voting regions of west Texas as well. The mere fact that they vote Republican doesn't mean that you are going to get beat up if you're gay or have a purple mohawk.
I've lived in Texas, California (including Berkeley), and Massachusetts (Amherst/Northampton, extremely "liberal" area) and I've come to realize that the left-to-right spectrum doesn't do justice to the variations on politics, culture, values, lifestyles, etc., that one experiences around the country.
On just about every scale imaginable Utah is conservative, and without knowing much about eastern Idaho it wouldn't surprise me if you need to CONFORM to the NORMS AND VALUES of the majority there if you want to get along well. Just a hunch.
However, some of this is present in extremely leftist areas as well. Try being a Republican in Berkeley (not that I've ever done that, I was merely a moderate leftist but still felt like I wasn't far left enough for many of the PC cops who live there) or in Northampton, MA. There's a different form of "conservative" that I experience in those places, based on pressure to conform and an intolerance for diversity of opinions.
Now, another form of "liberal vs. conservative" is the way people express themselves in society. In this sense, Berkeley is VERY liberal, you can wear what you want, be as weird as you want, be an introvert or extrovert, it's all good as long as you don't vote moderate or conservative. But in western MA my experience was that the culture is very conservative, kind of "old world" and there's not as much playfulness as you find on the west coast.
This last distinction can be summed up by restaurants --- if you go to a vegetarian organic restaurant in the Bay Area of CA, there's a good chance you're going to experience a lot of flavor and fun and variety. In other words, it's decadent. Whereas my experience of the same type of restaurant in New England has been that it's more austere, people are less flamboyant, and the flavors are more boring (like macrobiotic, that type of thing.)
On top of all this you could add a gazillion other factors that go into each person's unique definition of what they mean by "liberal" vs. "conservative." What type of music --- only a narrow range of pop, or is there a lot of creativity? How much crazy behavior is tolerated on the streets? How much pressure is there to conform to the way your neighbors live? In this sense, I find that parts of west/central Texas and coastal California share a lot in common. They may vote differently, but the lifestyle feels kinda familiar. It's friendly, extremely tolerant and welcoming of unique styles and ideas, and the pressure to conform is low. I call that liberal. I don't know Idaho from a can of paint so I can't comment on it but my guess is that the influx of people from many other regions into Boise would, indeed, make it a fairly liberal place simply because of the variety of people it's absorbing and the diversity they contribute to culture, political debate, style, cuisine, etc.