Congress to get serious on illegal immigration. Federal spending could be withheld on Cities that don't comply! (born, illegal immigrants)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then if the pro-illegals really believe that the illegals build and economy and don't take government handouts and services, they won't object at all. Cities with large populations of illegals wouldn't need the handouts if the pro-illegals are right.
In a matter of weeks, Congress will go from trying to help young, illegal immigrants become legal to debating whether children born to parents who are in the country illegally should continue to enjoy automatic U.S. citizenship.
Congress is great a debating...Having the Supreme Court to even contemplate re-visiting the 14th amendment to the Constitution, is almost nill.
Quote:
There could be proposed curbs on federal spending in cities that don't do enough to identify people who are in the country illegally and attempts to reduce the numbers of legal immigrants
.
There are no federal statues requiring any municipality to act as immigration officials. National League of Cities holds power in state's legislatures...attempting to withold funds to cities means a short-fall to the states.
Congress is great a debating...Having the Supreme Court to even contemplate re-visiting the 14th amendment to the Constitution, is almost nill.
Think again. There’s more than enough support for stopping this egregious abuse of the 14th Amendment by foreign invaders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan
There are no federal statues requiring any municipality to act as immigration officials. National League of Cities holds power in state's legislatures...attempting to withold funds to cities means a short-fall to the states.
Oh please. These jurisdictions are aiding and abetting illegal aliens, which is a violation of federal law. They have a legal basis to deny funds.
But it also could further hurt the GOP in its endeavor to grab a large enough share of the growing Latino vote to win the White House and the Senate majority in 2012.
Why do we keep hearing about the "growing Latino vote?" The blunt question is: how many of the "growing Latino vote" can legally vote? If the DHS and ICE were to deport even a small piece of the Latino illegal immigrants (who are lumped into that "growing population) then legislators wouldn't be so conned into think they have to give into illegal immigrants (whom are mostly Hispanics, more specifically, Mexican). It's blunt and true.
The illegal immigrant community and the people that fight for them are trying to bully politicians with this whole idea that politicians need to Latino/Hispanic vote. It's so obvious.
Congress is great a debating...Having the Supreme Court to even contemplate re-visiting the 14th amendment to the Constitution, is almost nill.
.
There are no federal statues requiring any municipality to act as immigration officials. National League of Cities holds power in state's legislatures...attempting to withold funds to cities means a short-fall to the states.
Did you say once that you weren't Pro-illegal or did you change your stance on that? Either way is ok so long as you have a stance.
So they are ordering cities to take a harder stance on illegal immigration, but in the same breath condemn Arizona for dealing with illegal immigration. Riiiight.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.