Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If anything, this highlights the incongueties in immigration laws. On the hand, you have the US Supreme court rulling and the Federal govenment writing laws that all children will attend public school[illegal alien children included] and a ferderal immigration agancy, using that fact to conduct immigration enforcement.
The law only grants illegal alien children equal access to a K-12 education. It does NOT give their parents a free pass. That is the risk they take by choosing to violate our laws. Citizen children are also entitled to a tax-funded K-12 education. Does that mean if their parents are criminals, they should be off-limits? What point are you trying to make? How is it incongruent?
Just like the law grants children of shoplifters, drunk drivers, rapists, embezzlers, hot check writers free schooling but that does not automatically absolve the parents of crimes they commit.
Why aren't the pro-illegal posters shedding tears for all those other kinds of law breakers or their kids?
Or is the new rule that anyone who has kids to exploit never has to be held accountable for anything they do?
Just like the law grants children of shoplifters, drunk drivers, rapists, embezzlers, hot check writers free schooling but that does not automatically absolve the parents of crimes they commit.
Why aren't the pro-illegal posters shedding tears for all those other kinds of law breakers or their kids?
Or is the new rule that anyone who has kids to exploit never has to be held accountable for anything they do?
How true. Children suffer when their parents choose to live outside the law. However, we never hear whining when it involves citizens. Yet, somehow the children of illegals are special, and we are “separating families” when their parents are arrested.
Location: Oklahoma(formerly SoCalif) Originally Mich,
13,387 posts, read 19,428,052 times
Reputation: 4611
Besides, this is a onesided article and when it's told from the defensive side it's always twisted to make them sound innocent and make the other side look bad.
Location: Oklahoma(formerly SoCalif) Originally Mich,
13,387 posts, read 19,428,052 times
Reputation: 4611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar
How true. Children suffer when their parents choose to live outside the law. However, we never hear whining when it involves citizens. Yet, somehow the children of illegals are special, and we are “
Quote:
separating families
” when their parents are arrested.
Put the kids in prison with their parent, ...no more seperation.
This isn't a game of TAG and Illegals have a "Safe " zone.
Guess what ? Criminals are "stalked" every day of the week, it's called Law enforcement for a reason.
It's ALWAYS in the "Best" interest of America when the laws are enforced.
No your speaking out of politics and your way of thought.
Lets take your example, criminals are stalked everyday right? crackheads, pushers, etc.
Heres my reason to why this is wrong, We dont arrest crackheads who happen to enter a school, why? Cause they are dangerous people and might do stupid things in a school if cornered. Why not wait till they get back in their car and down the street? Why put children in danger?
Get out of your "fear shell" and think logically. We arent talking politics, we're talking about how they conducted this search?
And your other "they shouldnt take their children to school" Theres many legals going to school who shouldnt be in harms way if this was to get out of control, its not airport security where you have a choice to fly or not, its a law you must go to school so why should everyone have to be I.D.'d
"ICE officers are required to follow a policy that prohibits operations near schools unless approved by headquarters," his statement said. "It is not clear that this policy was appropriately followed in this matter."
Read~~ Not enough information so "stalking" accusations are uncalled for. If they were cleared to operate near a school then BRAVO.
"ICE officers are required to follow a policy that prohibits operations near schools unless approved by headquarters," his statement said. "It is not clear that this policy was appropriately followed in this matter."
Read~~ Not enough information so "stalking" accusations are uncalled for. If they were cleared to operate near a school then BRAVO.
"If"
If the ICE headquaters has to launch an investigation, then I'm pretty sure it wasnt cleared, why launch an investigation if you okayed it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
