Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lol, no. Even if that estimate isn't a gross exaggeration that $118B won't even come close to covering the interest on our debt let alone stave off some hypothetical catastrophic bankruptcy. This is quite the spectacular illusion these guys are pushing.
And to say 350,000 births cost $118 billion annually isn't doing the math, or saying where he got the "estimate" from...
If a woman who isn't a legal US citizen comes into the US illegally for the sole purpose of having a child on our soil so that child can then be a US citizen and take advantage of our social services then yes, it is a clear abuse of the 14th amendment. This has nothing to do with "brown kids" so put the race card back in your pocket.
How is this clear? Please cite where it says birthright citizenship is only supposed to be for... whichever people you think it's supposed to be for?
Yes, there are just enough tokens so that someone could plausibly claim that such opposition is not racist. But come on, we're all adults here, we're not that stupid. I mean Grandfather Clauses didn't specifically mention brown people either, but we all know what they were about.
Don't ya just love the not so subtle hints of the race card being pulled?
You mean when people post photoshopped drivers licenses (literally cards!) with mustached, sombrero-wearing, dirty, sweaty, mexicans pictured? Because that seems like the opposite of subtle IYAM.
The current interpretation is that children born here of illegals are citizens. I doubt the authors of the 14th had that in mind. Why would they it was a different world then. That's why the constitution is an ever evolving document. I doubt our forefathers ever dreamed lawyers would evolve into the slime that they have either.
So whats to be done? try to amend the 14th.
The current interpretation is that children born here of illegals are citizens. I doubt the authors of the 14th had that in mind. Why would they it was a different world then. That's why the constitution is an ever evolving document. I doubt our forefathers ever dreamed lawyers would evolve into the slime that they have either.
So whats to be done? try to amend the 14th.
Do we also need to change the 2nd Amendment because of assault rifles?...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
