Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-09-2011, 10:35 PM
 
Location: California
2,475 posts, read 2,075,935 times
Reputation: 300

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by huddledmasses View Post
So where and by what process is citizenship gained?
You need to look at/read the Department of States Foreign Affairs manual as it interprets the INA's over the years (1795-) to include its own interpretation of SCOTUS rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2011, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,846,670 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadtrip75 View Post
The 14th Amendment reads:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."

This excludes foreigners who are subject to other jurisdictions, such as babies of Mexican mothers...
How is a baby foreign to the place it is born? Your last sentence argues the foreignness of the baby, not the mother. Why do you also mention a specific nationality (Mexican mothers can be in different immigration statuses within the United States)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2011, 11:27 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,846,670 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadtrip75 View Post
Wrong and wrong. The Supreme Court has made numerous correct interpretations of the 14th Amendment in addition to its incorrect interpretations. Normal jurisprudence is that anchor babies are not citizens. We are the only country in the world with this insane policy...
Wrong, we're actually with nearly all countries in the Western Hemisphere (layman's terms: this half of the world) to have the policy of jus soli...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 01:50 AM
Yac
 
6,051 posts, read 7,727,132 times
I love the part when there is an actual discussion, don't really care for the part when you try as hard as you can to attack who you are debating. Despite the topic change that happened here, I think it would be really good for the forum if you focused on discussing instead of focusing on making it personal.
Yac.
__________________
Forum Rules
City-Data.com homepage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 07:16 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,316,367 times
Reputation: 2136
Jus soli is observed by less than 20% of the world's countries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli

Last edited by chicagonut; 08-10-2011 at 07:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 07:25 AM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,210,850 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liquid Reigns View Post
DOS recently changed the definition in the Foreign Affairs Manuel (8/21/2009 - Obama Admin took over in Jan 2009) to what it now states: d. “Subject to the Jurisdiction of the United Statesâ€: All children born in and subject, at the time of birth, to the jurisdiction of the United States acquire U.S. citizenship at birth even if their parents were in the United States illegally at the time of birth.
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86755.pdf
It will change again when a consentualist takes over the Admin.
Right, what I'm saying is if the definition was changed in a more controversial way, less in accordance with how the government has been operating for decades, you'd be likely to see a challenge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Tempe, Az
1,421 posts, read 1,490,828 times
Reputation: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
How is a baby foreign to the place it is born? Your last sentence argues the foreignness of the baby, not the mother. Why do you also mention a specific nationality (Mexican mothers can be in different immigration statuses within the United States)?
A kid born in Germany AINT German unless one parent IS German. Birthright aint a part of rich nations cept the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 08:42 AM
 
1,574 posts, read 1,018,866 times
Reputation: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
Jus soli is observed by less than 20% of the world's countries.

Jus soli - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But Mexico uses it, and we've been told about fourteen xillion times in this forum that we should have laws more like Mexico's, haven't we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 08:44 AM
 
1,574 posts, read 1,018,866 times
Reputation: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikCortez View Post
A kid born in Germany AINT German unless one parent IS German. Birthright aint a part of rich nations cept the USA.
Yeah, Canada is such a third world country.

Seriously, this arugment is ridiculous, because we could easily turn it around and say that Communist countries (Cuba, China, North Korea) all refuse to observe Jus Soli. Wow, this is really getting us somewhere!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2011, 09:33 AM
 
3,484 posts, read 2,871,413 times
Reputation: 2354
If you asked most Americans if an illegal alien should be able come here, give birth and then have the child given American citizenship they would say no. That's all that should matter.

It would be really nice if most Americans felt their voices are heard on this issue. Instead all we get is pandering to the hispanic lobby from politicians and arguments that anyone who does not believe in open borders and the massive importation of low skilled migrants is a racist.

The courts should listen to the people. Not La Raza or Roberto Menendez or greedy employers or Mexico's government. The people of the United States. Most of us rightfully feel that our citizenship laws should not be abused by foreign nationals. No one should ever be entitled to come here nine months pregnant with the express purpose of having the American taxpayer pay for their birthing costs and shell out welfare to the baby and its mother for eighteen years.

That's abuse. It needs to stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top