Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You guys are missing Chicago's point. You guys use plausible distinction frequently, but if Chicago does you thinks its hilarious. They weren't labeled as illegals until after they were found to be by our government, hence why Chicago stated they were probably "sent on their merry way though to seek work elsewhere in our country rather than detained and deported".
Either you are feigning ignorance or you are being intentionally obtuse as you are doing nothing more than attempting to get a kick out of LOL'ing at others.
The joke was funny though IBM, Donuts and Police, they go hand in mouth.
You guys are missing Chicago's point. You guys use plausible distinction frequently, but if Chicago does you thinks its hilarious. They weren't labeled as illegals until after they were found to be by our government, hence why Chicago stated they were probably "sent on their merry way though to seek work elsewhere in our country rather than detained and deported".
Either you are feigning ignorance or you are being intentionally obtuse as you are doing nothing more than attempting to get a kick out of LOL'ing at others.
The joke was funny though IBM, Donuts and Police, they go hand in mouth.
lol, she does not have a "point," she just missed the joke.
Really, you GUARANTEE it? I mean, between the line about having no idea what IBM was talking about, and then the follow up about how he seemed to be speaking in "riddles," where do you get that assurance?
Really, you GUARANTEE it? I mean, between the line about having no idea what IBM was talking about, and then the follow up about how he seemed to be speaking in "riddles," where do you get that assurance?
Come on now. Come. On. Now.
Because she made a point by invoking plausible distinction in asking how the police could have known the employees were illegal. The "riddles" was an attempt to get IBM to explain how the police should have known they were illegal employees.
What? Please elaborate as I have no idea what you are talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut
I still don't get what you are driving at. Why don't you elaborate instead of talking in riddles?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liquid Reigns
Because she made a point by invoking plausible distinction in asking how the police could have known the employees were illegal. The "riddles" was an attempt to get IBM to explain how the police should have known they were illegal employees.
btw, I'm slightly disappointed that I have been dragged into an argument after loling at someone not getting a joke twice in a row (which is a legitimately funny situation imo). I only continue because I am intrigued by wtf you believe you are talking about. I mean, look at her posts, which I quoted, and then look at the sentiment you ascribe to her statements. Something has happened.
btw, I'm slightly disappointed that I have been dragged into an argument after loling at someone not getting a joke twice in a row (which is a legitimately funny situation imo). I only continue because I am intrigued by wtf you believe you are talking about. I mean, look at her posts, which I quoted, and then look at the sentiment you ascribe to her statements. Something has happened.
You simply missed her points and in so doing are now feigning her intelligence by assuming she missed the joke. I know what I am talking about, there is no WTF to be had. I've known her arguments for well over 6 years, as we have both been in this immigration debate for longer then that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.