Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mexico does not need to be here, we are more lawful than they are.
If they are here illegally they need to be deported. Its very black & white.
So we should expel Mexico's diplomatic delegation? I am not really sure what you mean by "Mexico does not need to be here."
Quote:
There should be no need to explain why you are here illegally and why you should stay over someone who has legally entered. There should be no need for an Mexican referee to tell us how we should play by our rules
Well the first sentence doesn't really have anything to do with this issue specifically. As for the 2nd, I agree, it would be nice if law enforcement and the rest of the judicial system followed the rules, but sometimes people need reminding, apparently.
Why is what allowed? Why are diplomats from Mexico allowed in the US? Why are they allowed to speak? I'm not sure what you're asking here.
You just answered your own question. Yes, the person is asking why are they allowed to speak. Common sense tells us that those who are diplomats from Mexico are allowed to come to the United States if they do it the way they are supposed to. But, the question being asked is not that. The question is why are we entertaining them in our courts? It really is a question to be asked. The U.S. needs to grow a backbone against Mexico, but with our relationship with Mexico and NAFTA, there is not much motivation to.
so we should expel mexico's diplomatic delegation? I am not really sure what you mean by "mexico does not need to be here."
well the first sentence doesn't really have anything to do with this issue specifically. As for the 2nd, i agree, it would be nice if law enforcement and the rest of the judicial system followed the rules, but sometimes people need reminding, apparently.
You just answered your own question. Yes, the person is asking why are they allowed to speak. Common sense tells us that those who are diplomats from Mexico are allowed to come to the United States if they do it the way they are supposed to. But, the question being asked is not that. The question is why are we entertaining them in our courts? It really is a question to be asked. The U.S. needs to grow a backbone against Mexico, but with our relationship with Mexico and NAFTA, there is not much motivation to.
What is "the way they are supposed to" do it? Are they not "supposed to" be aware of the laws in the US?
As to why they are being entertained in US courts, why shouldn't they be? Are they saying anything that is to your knowledge factually inaccurate?
Or is it that you just don't like what they're saying so you're looking for any excuse to have them silenced?
Mexicans hold perspectives on lots of laws. Just like real people!
But they obviously are personally affected by immigration laws quite a bit, so they are more active in that arena.
Why particularly this law?
Invasion
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
