U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
Old 08-22-2011, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Denver
8,096 posts, read 10,015,233 times
Reputation: 3959

Advertisements

I'll just leave this here...

Quote:
Washington -- A San Francisco gay couple facing the threat of deportation may obtain relief through a surprise decision by the Obama administration to consider same-sex marriage when deciding whom to deport.

Bradford Wells, 55, a U.S. citizen, and Anthony John Makk, 48, a citizen of Australia, have resided in the Castro district for much of their 19-year relationship. They were married in Massachusetts seven years ago, but a series of visas Makk had used to remain legally in the United States expires by Aug. 25.
Fed deportation decision may benefit SF gay couple
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2011, 10:33 AM
 
1,574 posts, read 252,328 times
Reputation: 124
Oh wow gay + illegal, being "rewarded", this is like the jackpot news story, I am sure the haters are going to be FURIOUS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,197 posts, read 11,311,391 times
Reputation: 6370
I think its long over due that gays be allowed to sponsor their significant other as would a hetro individual. Gay citizens are entitled to the same rights and benefits as their straight counterparts. Its been too long denied to them what we straights take for granted and assume is our rights.
As for illegals.
Well we have a system in place. That system unjustly denies a citizen the right to sponsor their loved one. This is a valid mitigating circumstance.
Unlike hetro couples who have the option of doing it by the numbers gays are denied this same right.
Rhyme I have been asking you which laws descriminate. Here you are. This is just such a case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 07:20 PM
 
4,828 posts, read 4,796,989 times
Reputation: 617
This is not amnesty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 07:24 PM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,332,649 times
Reputation: 1939
What does sexual preference have to do with anything? I'm being serious, too. I would like to hear your answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,197 posts, read 11,311,391 times
Reputation: 6370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aganusn View Post
What does sexual preference have to do with anything? I'm being serious, too. I would like to hear your answer.
The issue is that gays are not allowed to sponsor the person they love the way a straight person can. The K-1 Visa for example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Richardson, TX
15,817 posts, read 14,073,737 times
Reputation: 13061
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
I think its long over due that gays be allowed to sponsor their significant other as would a hetro individual. Gay citizens are entitled to the same rights and benefits as their straight counterparts. Its been too long denied to them what we straights take for granted and assume is our rights.
As for illegals.
Well we have a system in place. That system unjustly denies a citizen the right to sponsor their loved one. This is a valid mitigating circumstance.
Unlike hetro couples who have the option of doing it by the numbers gays are denied this same right.
Rhyme I have been asking you which laws descriminate. Here you are. This is just such a case.
I agree. Gay couples should be treated the same as hetero couples when it comes to sponsoring for immigration, i.e. do it the right way and you're good, come illegally and buh-bye. But the 'right way' MUST be an option for them. Anything less is discrimination. They need the opportunity to do it the right way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,305 posts, read 1,913,768 times
Reputation: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
The issue is that gays are not allowed to sponsor the person they love the way a straight person can. The K-1 Visa for example.
But a K-1 in this specific instance is inappropriate for other reasons:

They are already married...

The Australian is already present in the United States (the K-1 is specifically single-entry, so someone can come here to marry)...

USCIS, which currently doesn´t recognize gay marriage, also specifies that the marriage must be consummated...

Which might violate some state laws in certain cases, for those non-progressive places that still exist...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 10:26 PM
 
47,586 posts, read 35,357,086 times
Reputation: 21573
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
I think its long over due that gays be allowed to sponsor their significant other as would a hetro individual. Gay citizens are entitled to the same rights and benefits as their straight counterparts. Its been too long denied to them what we straights take for granted and assume is our rights.
As for illegals.
Well we have a system in place. That system unjustly denies a citizen the right to sponsor their loved one. This is a valid mitigating circumstance.
Unlike hetro couples who have the option of doing it by the numbers gays are denied this same right.
Rhyme I have been asking you which laws descriminate. Here you are. This is just such a case.
And this relationship appears to be quite long-term and real, probably a lot longer term than many of the green card marriages between heteros.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2011, 04:37 PM
 
Location: CITY OF ANGELS AND CONSTANT DANGER
5,405 posts, read 7,899,922 times
Reputation: 2174
if i could rep you i would.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
I think its long over due that gays be allowed to sponsor their significant other as would a hetro individual. Gay citizens are entitled to the same rights and benefits as their straight counterparts. Its been too long denied to them what we straights take for granted and assume is our rights.
As for illegals.
Well we have a system in place. That system unjustly denies a citizen the right to sponsor their loved one. This is a valid mitigating circumstance.
Unlike hetro couples who have the option of doing it by the numbers gays are denied this same right.
Rhyme I have been asking you which laws descriminate. Here you are. This is just such a case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 PM.

© 2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top