Alabama "Immigrants" Moving To The Mid South (license, illegals, laws)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
MEMPHIS, TN (abc24.com) - Thousands of Latino children are being taken out of schools in Alabama. Families are seeking refuge in other states like Tennessee. This comes in the wake of Alabama’s new immigration law. The law states public schools can check the legal status of children and their parents, but will Tennessee follow suit?
"It's a sad day for the state of Alabama, for our country really because it's a step back," says Latino Memphis Director Maurico Calvo.
How the hell is this a step back for our country and a sad day for Alabama?
Unfortunately, when a lot of "Latino leaders" talk about something being "bad for America" or "bad for X state," they actually mean, "bad for illegal Latino America," and "bad for illegal Latinos of X state."
Tribalism over what is truly good for the United States.
What's a truly sad day for Alabama is that the Obama administration will likely step in as they did with Arizona to stop them. After all...it is election time, and there are millions of latino votes in play...and NOBODY panders for votes like the a-hole occupying the white house at the present time.
MEMPHIS, TN (abc24.com) - Thousands of Latino children are being taken out of schools in Alabama. Families are seeking refuge in other states like Tennessee. This comes in the wake of Alabama’s new immigration law. The law states public schools can check the legal status of children and their parents, but will Tennessee follow suit?
"It's a sad day for the state of Alabama, for our country really because it's a step back," says Latino Memphis Director Maurico Calvo.
Unfortunately, when a lot of "Latino leaders" talk about something being "bad for America" or "bad for X state," they actually mean, "bad for illegal Latino America," and "bad for illegal Latinos of X state."
Tribalism over what is truly good for the United States.
Using the term immigrant to describe illegals is like using the term modest home to describe a run down shack. Yes a run down shack can be described as a modest dwelling but it is it an accurate description? Not at all. Then why would we use such a term to describe the shack? To mislead of course. Sort of like saying a handymans special. Needs some work.
When people hear the term immigrant they would assume here legally.
So when the pro-side uses the term immigrant they wish to convey the message that illegals are of the same caliber and quality of legal immigrants. The desire is to blur the lines. We have seen those post on here that argue that illegals are immigrants. Yes they are in the most strict of definitions. But are they the same? On one hand you have the legal immigrant. This person applied to enter legally, respected our laws and waited until they were granted permission to enter.
The illegal often never even attempted to apply to enter, ignored our laws and rights as a nation to determine who may enter and imposed themselves upon us.
It can be argued that most illegals are not evil serial rapists or drug mules. The fact remains that they are here illegally and have done nothing and I stress nothing to show that they deserve the privilege of being allowed to stay. Quite the contrary, after entering illegally they go on to commit a number of more crimes. Fraud, tax evasion,driving without a license etc.
The pro-side would argue that some how this is our own fault. That we don't give the illegal any options. This defence is laughable because of 1 important fact. We as a nation have the right to determine who we feel is acceptable as an immigrant. This is recognized by international law. Another fact the pro-side will dismiss is the fact that we allow more imigration than all others.
Then come the sad stories. Man forced to leave his family when deported.
The fact he left 1 family to come here is less than relevant to the sob story. The fact that he lived here using fraud and commiting other crimes is not important. He is a victim. Sort of like when a man robs a bank because they declined his loan application.
Using the term immigrant to describe illegals is like using the term modest home to describe a run down shack. Yes a run down shack can be described as a modest dwelling but it is it an accurate description? Not at all. Then why would we use such a term to describe the shack? To mislead of course. Sort of like saying a handymans special. Needs some work.
When people hear the term immigrant they would assume here legally.
So when the pro-side uses the term immigrant they wish to convey the message that illegals are of the same caliber and quality of legal immigrants. The desire is to blur the lines. We have seen those post on here that argue that illegals are immigrants. Yes they are in the most strict of definitions. But are they the same? On one hand you have the legal immigrant. This person applied to enter legally, respected our laws and waited until they were granted permission to enter.
The illegal often never even attempted to apply to enter, ignored our laws and rights as a nation to determine who may enter and imposed themselves upon us.
It can be argued that most illegals are not evil serial rapists or drug mules. The fact remains that they are here illegally and have done nothing and I stress nothing to show that they deserve the privilege of being allowed to stay. Quite the contrary, after entering illegally they go on to commit a number of more crimes. Fraud, tax evasion,driving without a license etc.
The pro-side would argue that some how this is our own fault. That we don't give the illegal any options. This defence is laughable because of 1 important fact. We as a nation have the right to determine who we feel is acceptable as an immigrant. This is recognized by international law. Another fact the pro-side will dismiss is the fact that we allow more imigration than all others.
Then come the sad stories. Man forced to leave his family when deported.
The fact he left 1 family to come here is less than relevant to the sob story. The fact that he lived here using fraud and commiting other crimes is not important. He is a victim. Sort of like when a man robs a bank because they declined his loan application.
What's a truly sad day for Alabama is that the Obama administration will likely step in as they did with Arizona to stop them. After all...it is election time, and there are millions of latino votes in play...and NOBODY panders for votes like the a-hole occupying the white house at the present time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.