Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Radio List that have it RIGHT re illegal Migration & immigration in general.. for now.
ALL times are MST, do the math for your time zone, and those without times are easy to find, except for what I wrote below.. but please add/or comment to this list! ..
a lot of people supported nazi nationalism. do sheer numbers justify ideals?
This has nothing to do with Naziam at all and you know that. It does have to do with Nationalism and that is GOOD. Illegals are criminals and need to be dealt with in a harsh way. They broke the laws and that is the fact that you can't deny.
This has nothing to do with Naziam at all and you know that. It does have to do with Nationalism and that is GOOD.
nazism was a form of nationalism. but thats not the issue. my point is that widespread support doesnt mean that an idea is correct.
Quote:
Illegals are criminals and need to be dealt with in a harsh way. They broke the laws and that is the fact that you can't deny.
we all break laws. do we all need to be dealt with harshly? what is the guideline? violent crime vs non-violent crime? immigration would fall under the latter, like most of the laws we all break (speeding, littering, dui).
we all break laws. do we all need to be dealt with harshly? what is the guideline? violent crime vs non-violent crime? immigration would fall under the latter, like most of the laws we all break (speeding, littering, dui).
Those who choose to enter / remain in this country illegally should be, and are, dealt with "harshly" - they are detained and then deported. This deportation should be, and often is, "immediate". Illegals who have committed a crime while here illegally, should also be dealt with "harshly" - incarcerated for their crimes. And, if they are released from prision, then immediately deported.
Those who choose to enter / remain in this country illegally should be, and are, dealt with "harshly" - they are detained and then deported. This deportation should be, and often is, "immediate". Illegals who have committed a crime while here illegally, should also be dealt with "harshly" - incarcerated for their crimes. And, if they are released from prision, then immediately deported.
but they are crossing over illegally. how is deporting them to do it all over again any sort of real solution?
but they are crossing over illegally. how is deporting them to do it all over again any sort of real solution?
Many pay coyotes to be brought over - those people may run out of money - then they will not come here -
As for the others - ways must be, and are, found to keep those who seek to enter the US illegally, out -
An analogy I could also use to your comment above is, we jail criminals - then let them out - and they do crimes again - why put them in jail to begin with?
An analogy I could also use to your comment above is, we jail criminals - then let them out - and they do crimes again - why put them in jail to begin with?
Very well said but then I believe that Ghost only cares about Mexicans and other Spanish speaking criminals. I could be wrong but that is the way he comes across.
Many pay coyotes to be brought over - those people may run out of money - then they will not come here -
As for the others - ways must be, and are, found to keep those who seek to enter the US illegally, out -
An analogy I could also use to your comment above is, we jail criminals - then let them out - and they do crimes again - why put them in jail to begin with?
the analogy is not accurate. when people commit crimes, we put them in jail and if they commit another crime we put them back in. the time spent inside the jail is the punishment. you can jail immigrant criminals just the same. letting them out without time served (and deporting them) is not going to provide any justice, just a free do-over to a criminal.
Also the number of programs broadcasting stuff is irrelevant. Radio programming is not representative of polling sentiment. Had the talk radio programs been an accurate reflection of popular sentiment then Kerry would have pulled barely any vote total, and he barely lost. Think Rudy and Hillary would be the front runners if the radio program sentiments were polled?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
