Quote:
Originally Posted by solytaire
I can understand that sentiment. However, I feel as the largest contributor to the world bank, we have more than compensated for the economic disparities in South and Central America. A country like Mexico is actually fairly wealthy, and it has plenty of natural resources, which have actually earned it the classification of being a more middle class country. Therefore, international funding to that country (Mexico) isnt as robust as it would be in other, more impoverished countries. But that is to be attributed more to its corrupt mishandling of govt. resources than any lack of resources, natural or monetary.
|
It just seems that the reforms that were pushed onto Mexico in the 1980s really perpetuated the rising inequality that existed in the nation. Though yes, it is an upper income country, it clearly has class discrepancies not seen here in the US.
The thing about aid is that many times it has strict stipulations. For example in Jamaica, the textile industry died due to restrictions that came with the aid (one of the stipulations of the aid was the opening of the textile industry to foreign competition).
Obviously there is corruption, but stipulations (sometimes out of good intentions) tend to cause great harm.
As for the OP, it is a shame that AA and Hispanics do fight. Many live in the same communities. Unification can bring about change in these communities.