Immigrant agencies feel rise in harassment

[tinman01]

Originally Posted by User 2

oooooh,

now it sounds like a couple of eight year olds on the playground argueing over who is the toughest.....



....even while out the other side of their mouths, they say they don't condone violence.

(kind of like saying, 'I'm no bully, just don't try me')

It all comes off as condoning the harassment....
.
..

I think we have a different definition of harassment.
Stating that if you continue to threaten me I might retaliate is not harassment. Its giving fair warning that we all have our limits.
Emails and threatenting calls are childish and have no value. Calls to ask what their purpose and kind lines might be? Thenupon hearing an answer you dont like, you threaten to start a potition etc. would be what? An excercise of freedom. User 2 what was your take on the protestors in Berkeley? I called that harassment. Yes they excercised a freedom to its extreme.

[nvxplorer]

Originally Posted by ProLogic

I was asked what I found disturbing, and I showed it. If you have a problem with the post don't look at it. Simple as that.

No, it's not as simple as that. I didn't ask you "what [you] found disturbing." I asked if you found the specific quotes from hispanic supremacists disturbing:

Originally Posted by me, post #32

Don't you find any of those quotes disturbing?

You've waffled, backtracked, been disingenuous (as above), flip-flopped, changed the subject, etc., etc; which is why, in post #54, I asked if "Your ambition is politics?"

You're not kidding anyone, Pro. You see, when one talks out of both sides of his mouth, all we need to do is bring up one's words to demonstrate such double-talk.