U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2016, 03:15 PM
 
20,611 posts, read 12,290,347 times
Reputation: 5895

Advertisements

Montana state officials are not allowed to report the immigration status of people seeking state services, the state’s high court ruled on Tuesday.

In a unanimous decision, the court struck down the last piece of a voter-approved law meant to deter undocumented immigrants from living and working in the “Treasure State.” It upholds a 2014 ruling stating that the law denying unemployment benefits, university enrollment and other services to people who are in the country illegally was unconstitutional.

Montana court strikes down anti-immigrant law, allows undocumented to get services | Fox News Latino

I just don't get it; why so many courts HATE Americans here by protecting illegal aliens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2016, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,464 posts, read 2,301,154 times
Reputation: 5231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Montana state officials are not allowed to report the immigration status of people seeking state services, the state’s high court ruled on Tuesday.

In a unanimous decision, the court struck down the last piece of a voter-approved law meant to deter undocumented immigrants from living and working in the “Treasure State.” It upholds a 2014 ruling stating that the law denying unemployment benefits, university enrollment and other services to people who are in the country illegally was unconstitutional.

Montana court strikes down anti-immigrant law, allows undocumented to get services | Fox News Latino

I just don't get it; why so many courts HATE Americans here by protecting illegal aliens.

Because the court system is totally infested with anti-American Leftist sludge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 04:12 PM
 
31,543 posts, read 14,580,770 times
Reputation: 8401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Montana state officials are not allowed to report the immigration status of people seeking state services, the state’s high court ruled on Tuesday.

In a unanimous decision, the court struck down the last piece of a voter-approved law meant to deter undocumented immigrants from living and working in the “Treasure State.” It upholds a 2014 ruling stating that the law denying unemployment benefits, university enrollment and other services to people who are in the country illegally was unconstitutional.

Montana court strikes down anti-immigrant law, allows undocumented to get services | Fox News Latino

I just don't get it; why so many courts HATE Americans here by protecting illegal aliens.

Anti-"immigrant" law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Ohio
18,025 posts, read 13,247,591 times
Reputation: 13833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
I just don't get it; why so many courts HATE Americans here by protecting illegal aliens.
Read the 14th Amendment.

Quote:
Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
When you are ready to amend the Constitution's 14th Amendment to read as such.....

[...]; nor shall any state deprive any citizen of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any citizen within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

...let me know.

Until such time, keep groveling and complaining....you're doing a great job wasting precious time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:21 PM
 
25,060 posts, read 22,118,541 times
Reputation: 11576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Read the 14th Amendment.



When you are ready to amend the Constitution's 14th Amendment to read as such.....

[...]; nor shall any state deprive any citizen of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any citizen within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

...let me know.

Until such time, keep groveling and complaining....you're doing a great job wasting precious time.
Many Americans erroneously believe the Bill of Rights apply to citizens only. That's not true in the slightest. Plus, the US is signatory to UN treaties that protect human rights for foreigners on US soil
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 11:39 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
1,017 posts, read 554,032 times
Reputation: 1626
After reading here for years, I now strongly feel that the United States borders need to be thrown wide open, thus allowing anyone in the world to come here and receive free services, among other entitlements, at the expense of US taxpayers. After all, we are the richest country on earth; it's the least we can do. Makes perfect sense to me.

I am sure that's what our forefathers meant almost 250 years ago, and we should abide by their rules.

Oh, wait, wasn't that when only Caucasians counted as human beings, many were slave owners, Native Americans lost their land, women were not allowed to vote and considered chattel, ad nauseam? Yup, THOSE forefathers. The ones who declared that every person "must receive equal protection under the laws." See how far THAT went....

How easy it is to pick and choose whatever interpretation that fits some folks' agendas.

Last edited by Annie1004; 05-12-2016 at 11:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 11:43 PM
 
Location: West Los Angeles
8,839 posts, read 8,971,330 times
Reputation: 9082
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Many Americans erroneously believe the Bill of Rights apply to citizens only. That's not true in the slightest.
If Chinese, Russian, and North Korean soldiers landed in the U.S. and started conquering one neighborhood after another, would they too be protected by the Bill of Rights simply because they're standing on U.S. soil?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 06:44 AM
 
20,611 posts, read 12,290,347 times
Reputation: 5895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Read the 14th Amendment.



When you are ready to amend the Constitution's 14th Amendment to read as such.....

[...]; nor shall any state deprive any citizen of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any citizen within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

...let me know.

Until such time, keep groveling and complaining....you're doing a great job wasting precious time.
The US born kids of foreign diplomats DON'T get birthright and their parents are in the US legally. I don't get how the US born kids of ILLEGAL aliens have more rights.

If talking that Chinese family with their US born kid 150 years ago, the family was in the US legally, NOT illegally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Trieste
877 posts, read 754,515 times
Reputation: 658
A information, please
aren't in USA judges elected by the voters?so Montana people elected this liberal judge in the court, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 07:35 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
1,017 posts, read 554,032 times
Reputation: 1626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exitus Acta Probat View Post
If Chinese, Russian, and North Korean soldiers landed in the U.S. and started conquering one neighborhood after another, would they too be protected by the Bill of Rights simply because they're standing on U.S. soil?
Best post ever!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top