Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They better be careful. I could easily see Trump loosing in the 9th circuit, then cutting off funding just to create a major backlash against sanctuary cities.
Salinas probably has at least 50% illegal aliens, so I am not surprised. Most of the remaining population consists of wealthy farmers/land owners. See the connection? Of course, Salinas doesn't want to lose its illegal, as well as its criminal, elements.
Salinas probably has at least 50% illegal aliens, so I am not surprised. Most of the remaining population consists of wealthy farmers/land owners. See the connection? Of course, Salinas doesn't want to lose its illegal, as well as its criminal, elements.
See you in court Mr. Trump. There is nothing in the Constitution or statutes requiring states and local jurisdictions to enforce immigration laws. Detainers are NOT warrants. Why cut valuable funding to cities because they are complying with the law? Trump will get another kick in his face with this upcoming loss.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.