Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

^^^
You're repeating yourself.

Flummoxed?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Pay attention, now.

Stiff employer sanctions.
Answer the question. E-verify misidentifies 54% of illegal workers as eligible to work in the US. So how would employers be able to vet employees beyond e-verify authentication, which is highly ineffective?

A unique biometric identifier such as fingerprints, retinal scan, etc., would be required from every US citizen, LPR, and authorized temporary non-citizen worker to make e-verify work the way it was intended to. Since e-verify has no such database, what's the answer? Just don't hire anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to be safe from such sanctions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
^^^

Yep...

Flummoxed

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:48 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
^^^

Yep...

Flummoxed
I can see you STILL can't answer the question.

E-verify misidentifies 54% of illegal workers as eligible to work in the US. So how would employers be able to vet employees beyond e-verify authentication, which is highly ineffective?

A unique biometric identifier such as fingerprints, retinal scan, etc., would be required from every US citizen, LPR, and authorized temporary non-citizen worker to make e-verify work the way it was intended to. Since e-verify has no such database, what's the answer? Just don't hire anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to be safe from such sanctions?

Well, "old Gringo," maybe that's what American employers should do. Refuse to hire
anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to avoid your suggested "employer sanctions."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:48 AM
 
62,938 posts, read 29,126,415 times
Reputation: 18577
When are the Democrats going to stop blocking e-verify? When are the Democrats going to after the Democrat farmers and other employers who hire illegal aliens instead of advocating for amnesty for them and advocating for sanctuary cities? Both parties are guilty but based on the above who's the most guilty?

Last edited by Oldglory; 08-24-2018 at 09:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 09:51 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
When are the Democrats going to stop blocking e-verify? When are the Democrats going to after the Democrat farmers and other employers who hire illegal aliens instead of advocating for amnesty for them? What hypocrites they are!
E-verify is ineffective. It misidentifies 54% of illegal workers as eligible to work in the US, due largely to identity theft/fraud.

It's getting to the point that eliminating illegal alien employment is going to hinge on employers refusing to hire anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name. If the left wants to go there, so be it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 10:54 AM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,113,468 times
Reputation: 5667
Hispanic here. Yes I have to fight the urge to join gangs like MS-13.. Luckily I take a pill which suppresses it..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 10:57 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
Hispanic here. Yes I have to fight the urge to join gangs like MS-13.. Luckily I take a pill which suppresses it..
You're the perfect person to ask...

E-verify misidentifies 54% of illegal workers as eligible to work in the US. So how would employers be able to vet employees beyond e-verify authentication, which is highly ineffective?

A unique biometric identifier such as fingerprints, retinal scan, etc., would be required from every US citizen, LPR, and authorized temporary non-citizen worker to make e-verify work the way it was intended to. Since e-verify has no such database, what's the answer? Just don't hire anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to be safe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,287,618 times
Reputation: 11032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
Hispanic here. Yes I have to fight the urge to join gangs like MS-13.. Luckily I take a pill which suppresses it..
MS-13 is so yesterday. All the cool kids are on to MT-14
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2018, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Get over yourself

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I can see you STILL can't answer the question.
It's YOUR question.

You find the answer.

I don't much give a flip about your questions. Use your rugged self reliance to dig it up.

Quote:
E-verify misidentifies 54% of illegal workers as eligible to work in the US. So how would employers be able to vet employees beyond e-verify authentication, which is highly ineffective?

A unique biometric identifier such as fingerprints, retinal scan, etc., would be required from every US citizen, LPR, and authorized temporary non-citizen worker to make e-verify work the way it was intended to. Since e-verify has no such database, what's the answer? Just don't hire anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to be safe from such sanctions?

Well, "old Gringo," maybe that's what American employers should do. Refuse to hire
anyone who looks Hispanic or has a Hispanic name to avoid your suggested "employer sanctions."
As I've already 'splained to you, employers have found plenty of ways to hire illegals. They can find plenty of ways to avoid hiring them. And that's what they'd do if they started getting penalized heavily.

Until then, it's just the same old corporate welfare.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top