U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 07-13-2008, 12:05 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
108 posts, read 92,176 times
Reputation: 29
EventHorizon is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisp444 View Post
I have to say: Besides the fact that AMC is going to slam you on this one, this actually COULD be interpreted as anti-Hispanic. Most of your posts are anti-ILLEGAL as opposed to anti-Hispanic, but this one kind of crosses the line.
I have always prided myself in the fact that I am the only gringo I actually know who knows how to speak fluent Spanish, and I have many hispanic friends. The majority (is there a stronger word for majority?) of illegal immigrant offenders are hispanic, and that wrightly or wrongly translates into Americans innocently inferring that even if they are not here illegally, they are somehow aligned with the "cause" : immigration is good and the U.S. should be a bi-lingual nation like Canada so that everyone can be happy. You'll have to excuse crisp as he is sometimes oversensitive to hispanic issues being that he is used to more sympathetic forums such as the one in Miami. The main question is where this country will be in 50 years?

Will the state houses of congress be conducted in Spanish and English, with translators and ear phones like the United Nations or the Nuremburg trials?

Will the Southwest secede after a severe U.S. depression in 2040 and become part of Mexico?

Will the minority become the majority? By 2050 will it be a rarity to have a non-hispanic on a presidential ballot?

Last edited by EventHorizon; 07-13-2008 at 12:21 AM.. Reason: spelling error duh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2008, 12:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC via Boston, Madrid, & Miami
2,842 posts, read 2,001,525 times
Reputation: 941
crisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to beholdcrisp444 is a splendid one to behold
EventHorizon:

Will the state houses of congress be conducted in Spanish and English, with translators and ear phones like the United Nations or the Nuremburg trials?
-No. Government meetings will be conducted exclusively in English like they are now.

Will the Southwest secede after a severe U.S. depression in 2040 and become part of Mexico?
-No. Why would the Southwest leave a country as wealthy as the US and go to Mexico? Most second/third-generation Mexican-Americans don't even speak Spanish, let alone the non-Hispanic white, black, and Asian people.

Will the minority become the majority? By 2050 will it be a rarity to have a non-hispanic on a presidential ballot?
-Hispanics will only compose about 25% of the US population in 2050. Furthermore, the government is likely to stop using the term "white non-Hispanic" and will probably replace it with just "white" in order to move white Hispanics from "minority" to "majority" status. This way, the US will still be well over 50% "white" in 2050. If this change doesn't occur, the US is forecast to be at about 50% white non-Hispanic and 50% "minority" (including whites of Hispanic origin) in that year.
-I would be SHOCKED if it were a rarity to have a non-Hispanic name on the presidential ballot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2008, 12:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
29 posts, read 20,048 times
Reputation: 16
jimjames3000 is on a distinguished road
Smile Anti-illegal...

Quote:
Originally Posted by crisp444 View Post
I have to say: Besides the fact that AMC is going to slam you on this one, this actually COULD be interpreted as anti-Hispanic. Most of your posts are anti-ILLEGAL as opposed to anti-Hispanic, but this one kind of crosses the line.

I agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2008, 12:26 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
108 posts, read 92,176 times
Reputation: 29
EventHorizon is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisp444 View Post
EventHorizon:

Will the state houses of congress be conducted in Spanish and English, with translators and ear phones like the United Nations or the Nuremburg trials?
-No. Government meetings will be conducted exclusively in English like they are now.

Will the Southwest secede after a severe U.S. depression in 2040 and become part of Mexico?
-No. Why would the Southwest leave a country as wealthy as the US and go to Mexico? Most second/third-generation Mexican-Americans don't even speak Spanish, let alone the non-Hispanic white, black, and Asian people.

Will the minority become the majority? By 2050 will it be a rarity to have a non-hispanic on a presidential ballot?
-Hispanics will only compose about 25% of the US population in 2050. Furthermore, the government is likely to stop using the term "white non-Hispanic" and will probably replace it with just "white" in order to move white Hispanics from "minority" to "majority" status. This way, the US will still be well over 50% "white" in 2050. If this change doesn't occur, the US is forecast to be at about 50% white non-Hispanic and 50% "minority" (including whites of Hispanic origin) in that year.
-I would be SHOCKED if it were a rarity to have a non-Hispanic name on the presidential ballot.
50 years ago they would have said the same thing about "pressing 2" for Spanish on the phone like we do today. They would have called it ludicrous, and that it would never happen in this country...

It's what the Supreme Court often refers to as a slippery slope. But I hope you're right for both our sakes.

Last edited by EventHorizon; 07-13-2008 at 01:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2008, 01:02 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
2,070 posts, read 1,000,149 times
Reputation: 345
GuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the roughGuyPinestra is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by EventHorizon View Post
50 years ago they would have said the same thing about "pressing 2" for Spanish on the phone like we do today. They would have called it ludacris, and that it would never happen in this country...

It's what the Supreme Court often refers to as a slippery slope. But I hope you're right for both our sakes.
Ludacris is a singer, ludicrous is the word you're looking for.

(Sorry, but my inner spelling Nazi got the better of me...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2008, 01:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
12,694 posts, read 5,685,520 times
Reputation: 3189
malamute has a reputation beyond repute
malamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisp444 View Post
I have to say: Besides the fact that AMC is going to slam you on this one, this actually COULD be interpreted as anti-Hispanic. Most of your posts are anti-ILLEGAL as opposed to anti-Hispanic, but this one kind of crosses the line.
How would "And; let that serve as a warning to any other racial/ethnic group who dares to come to the USA illegally and demands 'rights' which do not apply to lawbreakers." be anti-hispanic or racist?

I think it's very racist to insist that "hispanics" have some special racist right to break the immigration and other laws of this country while other ethnic groups do not.

To insist that borders be wide open and unenforced for one ethnic group is racist, to say that all groups equally cannot come here and demand 'rights' simply is not racist unless an exception is made for one group -- which is closer to what the pro-hispanic-illegals obviously are all about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2008, 01:22 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pa
7,078 posts, read 2,619,618 times
Reputation: 1600
tinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant futuretinman01 has a brilliant future
Send a message via Yahoo to tinman01
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
How would "And; let that serve as a warning to any other racial/ethnic group who dares to come to the USA illegally and demands 'rights' which do not apply to lawbreakers." be anti-hispanic or racist?

I think it's very racist to insist that "hispanics" have some special racist right to break the immigration and other laws of this country while other ethnic groups do not.

To insist that borders be wide open and unenforced for one ethnic group is racist, to say that all groups equally cannot come here and demand 'rights' simply is not racist unless an exception is made for one group -- which is closer to what the pro-hispanic-illegals obviously are all about.
absolutely correct
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2008, 10:14 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
1 posts, read 447 times
Reputation: 10
blueseas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by crisp444 View Post
EventHorizon:

Will the state houses of congress be conducted in Spanish and English, with translators and ear phones like the United Nations or the Nuremburg trials?
-No. Government meetings will be conducted exclusively in English like they are now.

Will the Southwest secede after a severe U.S. depression in 2040 and become part of Mexico?
-No. Why would the Southwest leave a country as wealthy as the US and go to Mexico? Most second/third-generation Mexican-Americans don't even speak Spanish, let alone the non-Hispanic white, black, and Asian people.

Will the minority become the majority? By 2050 will it be a rarity to have a non-hispanic on a presidential ballot?
-Hispanics will only compose about 25% of the US population in 2050. Furthermore, the government is likely to stop using the term "white non-Hispanic" and will probably replace it with just "white" in order to move white Hispanics from "minority" to "majority" status. This way, the US will still be well over 50% "white" in 2050. If this change doesn't occur, the US is forecast to be at about 50% white non-Hispanic and 50% "minority" (including whites of Hispanic origin) in that year.
-I would be SHOCKED if it were a rarity to have a non-Hispanic name on the presidential ballot.
I agree with crisp here. What will happen is what happened with many Italians: simply, the definition of "white" will change once again to absorb the white Hispanics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2008, 11:40 PM
The land of bougainvillea, citrus and palm trees
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mesa, Az
18,996 posts, read 9,651,478 times
Reputation: 2565
ArizonaBear has a reputation beyond repute
ArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond reputeArizonaBear has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueseas View Post
I agree with crisp here. What will happen is what happened with many Italians: simply, the definition of "white" will change once again to absorb the white Hispanics.
Which may wind up leaving the Mestizo, etc. Hispanics out in the cold------again. Just like back in Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top