U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-07-2008, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,065 posts, read 3,182,583 times
Reputation: 391

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Californio View Post
However the stats I provided are up-to-date. To 1995? cmon.
We were talking about a statement John Tanton made in 1986, were we not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:01 PM
 
1,304 posts, read 2,929,472 times
Reputation: 393
ok folks.. use a little "Pro Logic" and you can figure
out who californio really is... !!! LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:04 PM
 
1,417 posts, read 857,927 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arizona Bound View Post
ok folks.. use a little "Pro Logic" and you can figure
out who californio really is... !!! LOL!
Back so soon ktoren or however it was spelt? 2 posts thats all we get promoting your white nationalist movement??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,065 posts, read 3,182,583 times
Reputation: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Californio View Post
Back so soon ktoren or however it was spelt? 2 posts thats all we get promoting your white nationalist movement??
Hey Californio, were we or were we not discussing a statement made by John Tanton in 1986?

Or did you just want to drop it because it made you look stupid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:09 PM
 
1,417 posts, read 857,927 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyPinestra View Post
Hey Californio, were we or were we not discussing a statement made by John Tanton in 1986?

Or did you just want to drop it because it made you look stupid?
And yet until this day, that statement has not been taken back.

I wonder what Lou Dobbs thinks of this guy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:21 PM
 
1,304 posts, read 2,929,472 times
Reputation: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyPinestra View Post
Hey Californio, were we or were we not discussing a statement made by John Tanton in 1986?

Or did you just want to drop it because it made you look stupid?
his real member name is Prologic... you all know him well..
name may have changed, but the same ole' bla bla bla is evident..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,065 posts, read 3,182,583 times
Reputation: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Californio View Post
And yet until this day, that statement has not been taken back.

I wonder what Lou Dobbs thinks of this guy

Quote:
On the demographic point: perhaps this is the first instance in which those with their pants up are going to get caught by those with their pants down!"
This is what we were discussing. Quit trying to change the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:28 PM
 
1,417 posts, read 857,927 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyPinestra View Post
This is what we were discussing. Quit trying to change the subject.

That is a statement he said in 1986. To this day, he has not taken it back. He has not acknowledged that he was wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,065 posts, read 3,182,583 times
Reputation: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Californio View Post
That is a statement he said in 1986. To this day, he has not taken it back. He has not acknowledged that he was wrong.
He WASN'T wrong, and the statistics I've posted PROVE he wasn't wrong. Go back and look at the CDC figures for 1990-1995. 1986-1990 and 1996-2000 are almost identical! That's the CDC website, so you can't say the data has been manipulated, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2008, 03:45 PM
 
1,417 posts, read 857,927 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyPinestra View Post
He WASN'T wrong, and the statistics I've posted PROVE he wasn't wrong. Go back and look at the CDC figures for 1990-1995. 1986-1990 and 1996-2000 are almost identical! That's the CDC website, so you can't say the data has been manipulated, either.
I see that the majority of the Mexicans back then were having 1, 2, and 3 children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top