U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2007, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Illinois
31 posts, read 85,585 times
Reputation: 58

Advertisements

Since this guy is second only to Hillary to becoming the Democratic Presidential nominee for 2008 (and has a decent chance of beating her in the primaries), let's see what he has to say about illegal immigration:

Quote:
Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on Immigration Reform

Monday, April 3, 2006

Mr. President, I come to the floor today to enter the debate on comprehensive immigration reform. It is a debate that will touch on the basic questions of morality, the law, and what it means to be an American.

I know that this debate evokes strong passions on all sides. The recent peaceful but passionate protests that we saw all across the country--500,000 in Los Angeles and 100,000 in my hometown of Chicago--are a testament to this fact, as are the concerns of millions of Americans about the security of our borders.

But I believe we can work together to pass immigration reform in a way that unites the people in this country, not in a way that divides us by playing on our worst instincts and fears.

Like millions of Americans, the immigrant story is also my story. My father came here from Kenya, and I represent a State where vibrant immigrant communities ranging from Mexican to Polish to Irish enrich our cities and neighborhoods. So I understand the allure of freedom and opportunity that fuels the dream of a life in the United States. But I also understand the need to fix a broken system.

When Congress last addressed this issue comprehensively in 1986, there were approximately 4 million illegal immigrants living in the United States. That number had grown substantially when Congress again addressed the issue in 1996. Today, it is estimated that there are more than 11 million undocumented aliens living in our country.

The American people are a welcoming and generous people. But those who enter our country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law. And because we live in an age where terrorists are challenging our borders, we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Americans are right to demand better border security and better enforcement of the immigration laws.

The bill the Judiciary Committee has passed would clearly strengthen enforcement. I will repeat that, because those arguing against the Judiciary Committee bill contrast that bill with a strong enforcement bill. The bill the Judiciary Committee passed clearly strengthens enforcement.

To begin with, the agencies charged with border security would receive new technology, new facilities, and more people to stop, process, and deport illegal immigrants.
But while security might start at our borders, it doesn't end there. Millions of undocumented immigrants live and work here without our knowing their identity or their background. We need to strike a workable bargain with them. They have to acknowledge that breaking our immigration laws was wrong. They must pay a penalty, and abide by all of our laws going forward. They must earn the right to stay over a 6-year period, and then they must wait another 5 years as legal permanent residents before they become citizens.

But in exchange for accepting those penalties, we must allow undocumented immigrants to come out of the shadows and step on a path toward full participation in our society. In fact, I will not support any bill that does not provide this earned path to citizenship for the undocumented population--not just for humanitarian reasons; not just because these people, having broken the law, did so for the best of motives, to try and provide a better life for their children and their grandchildren; but also because this is the only practical way we can get a handle on the population that is within our borders right now.

To keep from having to go through this difficult process again in the future, we must also replace the flow of undocumented immigrants coming to work here with a new flow of guestworkers. Illegal immigration is bad for illegal immigrants and bad for the workers against whom they compete.

Replacing the flood of illegals with a regulated stream of legal immigrants who enter the United States after background checks and who are provided labor rights would enhance our security, raise wages, and improve working conditions for all Americans.

But I fully appreciate that we cannot create a new guestworker program without making it as close to impossible as we can for illegal workers to find employment. We do not need new guestworkers plus future undocumented immigrants. We need guestworkers instead of undocumented immigrants.

Toward that end, American employers need to take responsibility. Too often illegal immigrants are lured here with a promise of a job, only to receive unconscionably low wages. In the interest of cheap labor, unscrupulous employers look the other way when employees provide ********** U.S. citizenship documents. Some actually call and place orders for undocumented workers because they don't want to pay minimum wages to American workers in surrounding communities. These acts hurt both American workers and immigrants whose sole aim is to work hard and get ahead. That is why we need a simple, foolproof, and mandatory mechanism for all employers to check the legal status of new hires. Such a mechanism is in the Judiciary Committee bill.

And before any guestworker is hired, the job must be made available to Americans at a decent wage with benefits. Employers then need to show that there are no Americans to take these jobs. I am not willing to take it on faith that there are jobs that Americans will not take. There has to be a showing. If this guestworker program is to succeed, it must be properly calibrated to make certain that these are jobs that cannot be filled by Americans, or that the guestworkers provide particular skills we can't find in this country.

I know that dealing with the undocumented population is difficult, for practical and political reasons. But we simply cannot claim to have dealt with the problems of illegal immigration if we ignore the illegal resident population or pretend they will leave voluntarily. Some of the proposed ideas in Congress provide a temporary legal status and call for deportation, but fail to answer how the government would deport 11 million people. I don't know how it would be done. I don't know how we would line up all the buses and trains and airplanes and send 11 million people back to their countries of origin. I don't know why it is that we expect they would voluntarily leave after having taken the risk of coming to this country without proper documentation.

I don't know many police officers across the country who would go along with the bill that came out of the House, a bill that would, if enacted, charge undocumented immigrants with felonies, and arrest priests who are providing meals to hungry immigrants, or people who are running shelters for women who have been subject to domestic abuse. I cannot imagine that we would be serious about making illegal immigrants into felons, and going after those who would aid such persons.

That approach is not serious. That is symbolism, that is demagoguery. It is important that if we are going to deal with this problem, we deal with it in a practical, commonsense way. If temporary legal status is granted but the policy says these immigrants are never good enough to become Americans, then the policy that makes little sense.

I believe successful, comprehensive immigration reform can be achieved by building on the work of the Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee bill combines some of the strongest elements of Senator Hagel's border security proposals with the realistic workplace and earned-citizenship program proposed by Senators McCain and Kennedy.

Mr. President, I will come to the floor over the next week to offer some amendments of my own, and to support amendments my colleagues will offer. I will also come to the floor to argue against amendments that contradict our tradition as a nation of immigrants and as a nation of laws.

As FDR reminded the Nation at the 50th anniversary of the dedication of the Statue of Liberty, those who landed at Ellis Island ``were the men and women who had the supreme courage to strike out for themselves, to abandon language and relatives, to start at the bottom without influence, without money, and without knowledge of life in a very young civilization.''

It behooves us to remember that not every single immigrant who came into the United States through Ellis Island had proper documentation. Not every one of our grandparents or great-grandparents would have necessarily qualified for legal immigration. But they came here in search of a dream, in search of hope. Americans understand that, and they are willing to give an opportunity to those who are already here, as long as we get serious about making sure that our borders actually mean something.

Today's immigrants seek to follow in the same tradition of immigration that has built this country. We do ourselves and them a disservice if we do not recognize the contributions of these individuals. And we fail to protect our Nation if we do not regain control over our immigration system immediately.
Any thoughts? Does Barack seem someone who will address this problem if elected President in 2008?


Last edited by Voyager; 02-23-2007 at 02:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2007, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Illinois
31 posts, read 85,585 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager View Post
It behooves us to remember that not every single immigrant who came into the United States through Ellis Island had proper documentation. Not every one of our grandparents or great-grandparents would have necessarily qualified for legal immigration. But they came here in search of a dream, in search of hope. Americans understand that, and they are willing to give an opportunity to those who are already here, as long as we get serious about making sure that our borders actually mean something.
If he is serious about that, I would consider voting for him. He seems to have more potential as an international diplomat than any other Presidential candidate in the race so far. Hillary is too polarizing, and McCain has too much of the Bush cowboy mentality going on. We need someone who can:

1. Be tough on enforcing border control.

2. Help the USA regain the respect of our (former) allies around the world.

3. Be willing to fight terrorism without going down rabbit trails.

Do you think Obama has the potential to accomplish these goals? I guess time will tell. We still have about 600 days to go.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2007, 05:07 PM
 
1,398 posts, read 6,019,301 times
Reputation: 1788
Obama's own website claims he defied his own party and refused to ally with its immigration treatises unless it contained written provisions that no guestworker or employment program should be allowed unless employers could prove that there were no Americans applying and capable of same. I like backbone in a candidate, and I like your conclusions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2007, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,449 posts, read 22,959,819 times
Reputation: 7246
That only makes me like him even more. He's already my favorite for many reasons. I sure hope he gets the nomination and becomes president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2007, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Florida
540 posts, read 1,105,197 times
Reputation: 164
If he sticks to his guns, I would vote for him. How can you tell if he is sincere? He has a better chance than the former First Lady.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2007, 09:04 PM
 
340 posts, read 669,477 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floridanative2 View Post
If he sticks to his guns, I would vote for him. How can you tell if he is sincere? He has a better chance than the former First Lady.
If you vote for him based on his promises, and he doesn't deliver, can we ask you if "You are happy you voted for him ??"..

Hindsight is 20/20, and being an armchair quarterback is easy to do..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2007, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Florida
540 posts, read 1,105,197 times
Reputation: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dir Drill 1 View Post
If you vote for him based on his promises, and he doesn't deliver, can we ask you if "You are happy you voted for him ??"..

Hindsight is 20/20, and being an armchair quarterback is easy to do..
Touche'-you are right! lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2007, 10:34 AM
 
2,218 posts, read 4,886,782 times
Reputation: 1703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dir Drill 1 View Post
If you vote for him based on his promises, and he doesn't deliver, can we ask you if "You are happy you voted for him ??"..

Hindsight is 20/20, and being an armchair quarterback is easy to do..
Yup anyone can throw promises at the people. But it takes a real person to make good on them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2007, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,449 posts, read 22,959,819 times
Reputation: 7246
Quote:
Originally Posted by iroquoispliskin View Post
Yup anyone can throw promises at the people. But it takes a real person to make good on them.
So would you rather vote for someone who makes no bones about wanting completely open borders on the basis of them not making good on their promises?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2007, 12:26 PM
 
340 posts, read 669,477 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
So would you rather vote for someone who makes no bones about wanting completely open borders on the basis of them not making good on their promises?
I would like to vote for someone who simply stands behind their promises, and be able to trust them.. Who is that ???... Unfortunately no one can answer that because you don't know what any of them will do until you vote them in...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top